1 / 10

Brief Review up to Now

Transmitted by expert from JAPAN. Informal document No. ITS-19-06 （ 19th ITS, 11March 2011, Agenda item 4). Brief Review up to Now. March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting. T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan. 1. Current activities: TOR : November 2004

mstroud
Download Presentation

Brief Review up to Now

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Transmitted by expert from JAPAN Informal document No. ITS-19-06 （19th ITS, 11March 2011, Agenda item 4) Brief Reviewup to Now March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan 1

  2. Current activities: • TOR : November 2004 • To develop common understanding of driver assistance systems • Report of Two Years Activities : March 2007 • Appropriateness of "Driver in the Loop" under normal driving condition • Effectiveness of damage mitigation under pre-crash condition where collision is no longer avoidable • Proposal of Warning Guidelines to WP29 : March 2010 2

  3. How ADAS assist driver in terms of HMI : Behavioral Model of a Driver • Level 0 • Level 1 • Level 2 • Level 3 recognition judgment operation Conventional driving recognition judgment operation Information recognition judgment operation Warning recognition judgment operation Control Assistance by Advanced Technologies 3

  4. Report of two years activities : • Information : • To keep monitoring the situation of self-commitment basis guidelines in each region for a time being • Warning : • To develop high-priority warning guidelines in cooperation with IHRA-ITS WG • Control : • To have following understanding as a base for future consideration 4 4

  5. Control (continued) : • Systems should be designed in which driver is always held responsible for his/her driving. For this purpose followings are effective. • Installation of auditory or visual announcement devices providing information on the system functioning • Control systems activated under normal driving condition should be designed based on “Driving in the loop”, where driver should be involved in driving in a way or other. For this purpose followings are effective. • Announcement is made when the driving initiative is transferred from system to driver. • Driver is kept involved in driving operation. For example, starting initiative should not be given to system. • System allows switching on or off by driver • System allows overriding by driver • As for Control systems to reduce collision speed activated under pre-crash condition where collision is no longer avoidable, there is no room for necessity of overriding and driver is not very likely to depend on system. 5

  6. What are warning guidelines ? • Purpose : to provide basic recommendations for the design of high-priority warnings on ADAS • Better understanding from drivers • Reduced confusion • More accurate and consistent expectations • High-priority warning : to be delivered at critical situation where the driver is required to take immediate action or decision to avoid crash event 6

  7. Warning guidelines • High-priority warning should be noticeable in the driving environment. • High-priority warning should be distinguishable from other messages in the vehicle. • High-priority warning should provide spatial cues to the hazard location. • High-priority warning should inform the driver of proximity of the hazard. • High-priority warning should elicit timely response or decisions. • Multiple warnings should be prioritized. • False/nuisance warnings rate should be low. • System status and degraded performance of high-priority warnings should be displayed. 7

  8. Application of warning guidelines to AEBS and LDWS : • High-priority warning should be noticeable in the driving environment. -----, two modalities or more are generally recommended to make high-priority warnings more noticeable, however the warnings can be displayed using one modality if it can be ensured that the driver will notice the warning. ----- Proposal for draft Regulation on LDWS : 68th Session of GRRF, Sept/2010 5.4. Warning indication 5.4.1. The lane departure warning referred to in paragraph 5.2.1. shall be noticeable by the driver and be provided by: (a) at least two warning means out of optical, acoustic and haptic, or (b) one warning means out of haptic and acoustic, with spatial indication about the direction of unintended drift of the vehicle. 8

  9. Wrap up : • ITS Informal Group submitted Warning Guidelines in March, 2010. Final decision of WP29 will be made in next June, 2011. • "Driver in the Loop" Principles were drafted by IHRA-ITS WG, dealing with advanced driver assistance systems. 9

  10. Thank you for your attention 10

More Related