160 likes | 175 Views
Explore protein characteristics through 3D folding models, evolutionary relationships, and signal sequence identification. Tools such as ANN and HMM are used to analyze conserved regions, protein sorting, and structure prediction. Learn about ANN’s brain-like functioning and HMM for hidden state predictions in genomics. Use ExPASy for comprehensive protein analysis and prediction. Discover multiple alignment for phylogenetic studies and conserved region identification.
E N D
3-D fold model Identification of conserved regions Evolutionary relationship (Phylogeny) -Family member -Multiple alignments Protein sequence Protein sorting and sub-cellular localization Anchoring into the membrane Signal sequence (tags) Some nascent proteins contain a specific signal, or targeting sequence that directs them to the correct organelle. (ER, mitochondrial, chloroplast, lysosome, vacuoles, Golgi, or cytosol) Tools to analyze protein characteristics
Learning algorithms are good for solving problems in pattern recognition because they can be trained on a sample data set. Classes of learning algorithms: -Artificial neural networks (ANNs) -Hidden Markov Models (HMM) Questions Can we train the computers: To detect signal sequences and predict protein destination? To identify conserved domains (or a pattern)in proteins? To predict the membrane-anchoring type of a protein? (Transmembrane domain, GPI anchor…) To predict the 3D structure of a protein?
Artificial neural networks (ANN) Machine learning algorithms that mimic the brain. Real brains, however, are orders of magnitude more complex than any ANN so far considered. ANN is composed of a large number of highly interconnected processing elements (neurons) working simultaneously to solve specific problems. ANNs, like people, learn by example. ANNs cannot be programmed to perform a specific task. The first artificial neuron was developed in 1943 by the neurophysiologist Warren McCulloch and the logician Walter Pits.
Hidden Markov Models (HMM) Used to answer questions like: What is the probability of obtaining a particular outcome? What is the best model from many combinations? HMM is a probabilisticprocess over a set of states, in which the states are “hidden”. It is only the outcome that visible to the observer. Hence, the name Hidden Markov Model. • HMM has many uses in genomics: • Gene prediction (GENSCAN) • SignalP • Finding periodic patterns
The ExPASy (Expert Protein Analysis System) Expasy server (http://au.expasy.org) is dedicated to the analysis of protein sequences and structures. Sequence analysis tools include: DNA -> Protein [Translate] Patternand profile searches Post-translational modification and topology prediction Primary structure analysis Structure prediction (2D and 3D) Alignment
PredictProtein:A service for sequence analysis, and structure prediction http://www.predictprotein.org/newwebsite/submit.html TMpred: http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html TMHMM: Predicts transmembrane helices in proteins (CBS; Denmark) http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/ big-PI : Predicts GPI-anchor site:http://mendel.imp.univie.ac.at/sat/gpi/gpi_server.html DGPI: Predicts GPI-anchor site: http://129.194.185.165/dgpi/index_en.html SignalP: Predicts signal peptide: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/ PSORT: Predicts sub-cellular localization:http://www.psort.org/ TargetP: Predicts sub-cellular localization:http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/ NetNGlyc: Predicts N-glycosylation sites:http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/ PTS1: Predicts peroxisomal targeting sequences http://mendel.imp.univie.ac.at/mendeljsp/sat/pts1/PTS1predictor.jsp MITOPROT: Predicts of mitochondrial targeting sequences http://ihg.gsf.de/ihg/mitoprot.html Hydrophobicity: http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/molkit/hydropathy/index.html
Multiple alignment • Used to do phylogenetic analysis: • Same protein from different species • Evolutionary relationship: history • Used to find conserved regions • Local multiple alignment reveals conserved regions • Conserved regions usually are key functional regions • These regions are prime targets fordrug developments • Protein domains are often conserved across many species Algorithm for search of conserved regions: Block maker: http://blocks.fhcrc.org/blocks/make_blocks.html
Multiple alignment tools Free programs: Phylip and PAUP: http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html Phyml: http://atgc.lirmm.fr/phyml/ The most used websites : http://align.genome.jp/ http://prodes.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/multalin.html http://www.ch.embnet.org/index.html(T-COFFEE and ClustalW) ClustalW: Standard popular software Italigns 2 and keep on adding a new sequence to the alignment Problem: It is simply a heuristics. Motif discovery: use your own motif to search databases: PatternFind: http://myhits.isb-sib.ch/cgi-bin/pattern_search
Phylogenetic analysis Phylogenetic trees Describe evolutionary relationships between sequences Major modes that drive the evolution: Point mutations modify existing sequences Duplications (re-use existing sequence) Rearrangement • Two most common methods • Maximum parsimony • Maximum likelihood
Parsimony vs Maximum likelihood Parsimony is the most popular method in which the simplest answer is always the preferred one. It involvesstatistical evaluationof the number of mutations need to explain the observed data. The best tree is the one that requires thefewestnumber of evolutionary changes. In contrast,maximum likelihood does not necessarily satisfy any optimality criterion. It attempts to answer the question: Whatparameters of evolutionary events was likely to produce the current data set? This is computationally difficult to do. This is the slowest of all methods. Likelihood generally performs better than parsimony
Definitions Homologous:Have a common ancestor. Homology cannot be measured. Orthologous:The same gene in different species . It is the result of speciation (common ancestral) Paralogous: Related genes (already diverged) in the same species. It is the result of genomic rearrangements or duplication
Determining protein structure • Direct measurement of structure • X-ray crystallography • NMR spectroscopy Site-directed mutagenesis • Computer modeling • Prediction of structure • Comparative protein-structure modeling
Comparative protein-structure modeling Goal:Construct 3-D model of a protein of unknown structure (target), based on similarity of sequence to proteins of known structure (templates) • Procedure: • Template selection • Template–target alignment • Model building • Model evaluation Blue: predicted model by PROSPECT Red: NMR structure
The Protein 3-D Database The Protein DataBase (PDB) contains 3-D structural data for proteins Founded in 1971 with a dozen structures As of June 2004, there were 25,760 structures in the database. All structures are reviewed for accuracy and data uniformity. • 80% come from X-ray crystallography • 16% come from NMR • 2% come from theoretical modeling Structural data from the PDB can be freely accessed at http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/
Most used websites for 3-D structure prediction Protein Homology/analogY Recognition Engine (Phyre) at http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre/html/index.html PredictProtein at http://www.predictprotein.org/newwebsite/submit.html UCLA Fold Recognition at http://www.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/Services/FOLD/