1.14k likes | 1.27k Views
Lecture 5: 2-d models and phase-plane analysis. references: Gerstner & Kistler, Ch 3 Koch, Ch 7. Reduced models. In HH, m is much faster than n, h. Reduced models. In HH, m is much faster than n, h. Reduced models. In HH, m is much faster than n, h. Try 2-d system:.
E N D
Lecture 5: 2-d models and phase-plane analysis • references: Gerstner & Kistler, Ch 3 Koch, Ch 7
Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h
Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h
Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h • Try 2-d system:
Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h • Try 2-d system: membrane potential eqn:
Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h • Try 2-d system: membrane potential eqn: Dynamics of w (like n):
Reduced models In HH, m is much faster than n, h • Try 2-d system: membrane potential eqn: Dynamics of w (like n): (from now on V -> u, C=1):
Nullclines u-nullcline w-nullcline
Nullclines u-nullcline w-nullcline
Nullclines u-nullcline w-nullcline intersections: fixed points
Stability of fixed points For a general system
Stability of fixed points For a general system Expand around FP:
Stability of fixed points For a general system Expand around FP:
Stability of fixed points For a general system Expand around FP: or
Stability of fixed points For a general system Expand around FP: or where
Stability of fixed points For a general system Expand around FP: or where
linearization set
linearization set Find eigenvectors v and eigenvalues l
linearization set Find eigenvectors v and eigenvalues l Stability if l1, l2 both < 0
linearization set Find eigenvectors v and eigenvalues l Stability if l1, l2 both < 0 i.e., l1+ l2 = trM< 0(Fu + Gw < 0) and l1l2 = det M > 0 (FuGw – FwGu > 0)
linearization set Find eigenvectors v and eigenvalues l Stability if l1, l2 both < 0 i.e., l1+ l2 = trM< 0(Fu + Gw < 0) and l1l2 = det M > 0 (FuGw – FwGu > 0) If det M < 0, both eigenvalues are real, one >0, the other <0:
linearization set Find eigenvectors v and eigenvalues l Stability if l1, l2 both < 0 i.e., l1+ l2 = trM< 0(Fu + Gw < 0) and l1l2 = det M > 0 (FuGw – FwGu > 0) If det M < 0, both eigenvalues are real, one >0, the other <0: Saddle point
Linearized equations: case A stable FP
Case B: Now make a > 0:
Case B: Now make a > 0: Lose stability if a > e or a > b
Case B: Now make a > 0: Lose stability if a > e or a > b Consider a < b:
Case B: Now make a > 0: Lose stability if a > e or a > b Consider a < b:
Case B: Now make a > 0: Lose stability if a > e or a > b Consider a < b: a< e: stable FP
Case B: Now make a > 0: Lose stability if a > e or a > b Consider a < b: a< e: stable FP a> e: unstable (both eigenvalues have positive real parts)
Case C: Now consider a > b > 0:
Case C: Now consider a > b > 0:
Case C: Now consider a > b > 0: det M < 0
Case C: Now consider a > b > 0: det M < 0 1 eigenvalue positive, 1 negative
Case C: Now consider a > b > 0: det M < 0 1 eigenvalue positive, 1 negative: saddle point
Case D: det M < 0 saddle point
Poincare-Bendixson theorem If • You have a repulsive fixed point • (both eigenvalues have positive real parts)
Poincare-Bendixson theorem If • You have a repulsive fixed point • (both eigenvalues have positive real parts) (2) There is a “bounding box” with the property that all flow across it is inward
Poincare-Bendixson theorem If • You have a repulsive fixed point • (both eigenvalues have positive real parts) (2) There is a “bounding box” with the property that all flow across it is inward
Poincare-Bendixson theorem If • You have a repulsive fixed point • (both eigenvalues have positive real parts) (2) There is a “bounding box” with the property that all flow across it is inward Then There must be a limit cycle in between