1.3k likes | 4.36k Views
New Public Management (NPM). Associate Professor Amporn Tamronglak , Ph.D. Faculty of Political Science Thammasat University. New Public Administration (NPA) vs. New Public Management (NPM). Amporn Tamronglak ®. What is New Public Administration (NPA)?. Amporn Tamronglak ®.
E N D
New Public Management (NPM) Associate Professor AmpornTamronglak, Ph.D. Faculty of Political Science Thammasat University
New Public Administration (NPA) vs. New Public Management (NPM) AmpornTamronglak ® Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
What is New Public Administration (NPA)? AmpornTamronglak ® • Minnowbrook Conference I, 1968 : from 3E’s to normative theory of public administration • 3E’s and social equity, responsiveness and representation • Minnowbrook Conference II, 1988 • Blacksburg Manifesto • Normative theory • Constitutional basis • Neo-institutionalism: Public Administration • Agential Leadership: second citizen • Active citizen • Authority and dialogue • Etc. Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
New Public Management (NPM) AmpornTamronglak ® • Owen Hughes (1994, 2004) • Christopher Pollitt • Christopher Hood (1991) • Gaebler and Osborne (1992) • Jan –Erik Lane • New Public Service by Denhardt and Denhardt Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
Administration vs. Management AmpornTamronglak ® • Administration , Oxford Dictionary:- • An act of administering, “to manage the affairs of” or “to direct or superintend the execution, use or conduct of” • Management:- • To conduct, to control the course of affairs by one’s own action, to take charge of (Oxford Dictionary) • The act or art of managing, the conducting or supervising of something as a business, especially the executive function of planning, organising, coordinating, directing, controlling and supervising any industrial or business project or activity with responsibility for results • Management comes form manus, meaning: to control by hand. Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
Driving forces for change to NPM…1 AmpornTamronglak ® • Attack on the public sector: 3 points • The scale of the public sector, too large, consuming to manage scarce resources • The scope of government, too many activities, leading to private sector--privatization, such as contracting-out • The methods of government with bureaucracy, becoming a highly unpopular form of social organization, leading to market principle Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
Driving forces for change to NPM…2 AmpornTamronglak ® • Change in economic theory in 1970s: • Public choice theory: the minimum role of government and maximum role of market forces • Principal/agent theory in private sector: the clear accountability of agent (manager) to principals (shareholders) by the contract Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
Driving forces for change to NPM…3 AmpornTamronglak ® • Globalization • Competitiveness Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
NPM AmpornTamronglak ® • Management defined by Hughes as the achievement of results, while administration means following instructions (Hughes, 1994, p. 60) • Function of general management by Allision (1982) • Strategy: setting objectives and priorities and create operational plans to achieve objectives • Managing internal components: organising and staffing, directing personnel, controlling performance • Managing external constitutencies (external unite, agencies from other branches or levels of government, interest groups, and private enterprises, the press and public Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
Hood (1991): 7 points in NPM AmpornTamronglak ® • Hands-on professional management • Implicit standards and measures fo performance • Emphasis on output controls • Disaggregation of units in the public sector • Greater competition • Private sector styles of management practices • Greater discipline and parsimony in resource use, cutting direct costs, raising labor discipline, limiting compliance costs to business:--doing more with less Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
Hughes (1994): 4 kinds of changes AmpornTamronglak ® • Focus on outputs • Changes to inputs: doing more with less, staff cuts, performance indicators with stress on economy and efficiency, short-term appointment, flexible budget, etc. • Reducing the scope of government: privatization, contracting-out, tendering competition • Relationships with politicians and the public: managers are now closer to the politicians, but the politicians have the final say. Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
Criticisms on NPM AmpornTamronglak ® • Problem of economic theory • Citizens and clients, consumers: the differences between public and private • Problem with measurement of results in public sector • Neo-Taylorism • Politicization • Reduce accountability: at arm’s length/indirect accountability • Implementation problems in performance management • Unclear specification : no clear definition of NPM Faculty of Political Science, Thammasat University
AmpornTamronglak ® Thank you.