1 / 14

Response to a Norovirus Outbreak in a University Residence - the Untold Story

Response to a Norovirus Outbreak in a University Residence - the Untold Story. Brae Surgeoner, 1 Ben Chapman, 1 and Doug Powell 2 1 Food Safety Network, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; 2 Food Safety Network, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA. Background:.

murray
Download Presentation

Response to a Norovirus Outbreak in a University Residence - the Untold Story

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Response to a Norovirus Outbreak in a University Residence - the Untold Story Brae Surgeoner,1 Ben Chapman,1 and Doug Powell2 1Food Safety Network, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada; 2Food Safety Network, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA

  2. Background: • CDC estimates 23 million cases of acute gastroenteritis are due to norovirus infection • ≥ 50 per cent foodborne outbreaks attributed to noroviruses • Symptoms begin approx. 24-48 hrs after exposure; can spread up to 72 hrs • Treatment = fluid & rest • Best prevention: thorough hand-washing

  3. Objectives: • To investigate adherence to hand hygiene at the peak of the investigation • To assess the impact of management’s communication efforts • To explore the factors that contributed to the duration of the outbreak

  4. Methodology • Combination of different research methodologies to provide more illuminating evidence of impact and/or effects • Observational component (n=357) • Student’s completed a self-report survey of behavior/attitudes/intentions (n=100) • Long interview component (n=6)

  5. Observation results

  6. Survey results • 64 per cent of respondents reported ALWAYS performing hand hygiene as recommended • But…only 20% of their peers ALWAYS performed hand hygiene as re • Quarantine term was used by 34 per cent of respondents, though not an official message

  7. Survey results cont’d • Of those who reported they were ill (n=37): • 48 per cent reported to health services • 21 per cent continued to attend class • 24 per cent continued to visit eateries

  8. Survey results cont’d • Social aspect of hand hygiene • Observed versus perceived impact • 7-point Likert scale (1= not at all / 7 = certainly) • Respondents uncertain if personal hand hygiene behavior influenced that of peers (mean 3.8) • And uncertain if hand hygiene behavior of peers influenced personal hand hygiene (mean 3.8) • Social & computer savvy nature of students

  9. Interview results • Rumors • Avian Influenza • WHO inspectors • Stigma of residents • Reported problems with professors • City transportation

  10. Interview results • Media inquiries focused on factors causing outbreak • Confusion over what to call the outbreak • Suspected vs. confirmed cases • Good cooperation between key outbreak personnel • Public health assumed hand sanitizer use increased

  11. Conclusions • Cost of soap vs. cost of outbreak investigation, stigmatization of students, and embarrassment to university • Evaluation differences • Strengthening social pressure toward hand hygiene may improve compliance • Establish an ‘in’ with impacted population watch what they do, listen to how they talk

More Related