170 likes | 200 Views
Eshetu Bekele VSU Parthenium Project- Ethiopia International Workshop on Bioogical Control and Management of Parthenium hysterophorus Addis Ababa, Ethiopia July 14-17, 2014. Plan to Evaluate the Impact of Biological Agents on the Invasive Weed Parthenium.
E N D
Eshetu Bekele VSU Parthenium Project- Ethiopia International Workshop on Bioogical Control and Management of Parthenium hysterophorus Addis Ababa, Ethiopia July 14-17, 2014 Plan to Evaluate the Impact of Biological Agents on the Invasive Weed Parthenium
I. Parthenium Management Practices should: • Address most of the adverse effects on • Crops and pastures • Livestock health and products • Social • Natural ecosystems • Include appropriate impact assessment plan and parameters • Quantify the economic benefits that could be obtained by managing the weed
II. Three Phase Evaluation of Impact Assessment • Evaluating pre-release baseline conditions • Provides benchmarks against which effectiveness of the bioagent can be later evaluated • Monitoring establishment and spread of the bioagents • This is an indicator of the ultimate success of any biological control program • Measuring actual impacts • This actually measures the ultimate success or failure of the biological control program
III. Assessment Approaches (Ref. “Best Practice Guide” Aust. W. Mag.) • Photo points • Comparison of a series of photographs taken from a fixed reference points • Periodically on release and non-release plots • Stakeholder survey • Comparative surveys of perceptions of managers, farmers DAs, etc • A questionnaire to assess their opinions before and after release
……cont • Comparing sites or plots with and without the bioagents: • Abundance of parthenium • Abundance of bioagents • Extent of damage • Response of the associated plant community
…..cont • Correlative studies: • Correlation between weed performance and agent density or damage severity • Agent exclusion experiments: • Comparison of protected plots (using pesticides or cages) with plots with the bioagents.
IV. Data Collection and Analysis • On parthenium: before/during release & end of seasons • NP, NF, Ht, BM, SB • On bioagent: fortnightly after release & end of seasons (at & beyond the release points) • NA, NP, NL, NE per plant • Extent of damage: during the season • NDP, PLAD, visual score (0-5) • Associated plant communities • Spp., abundance, and % coverage
…..cont • Data should be taken from a unit area • Example: 0.5 x 0.5m quadrant • It should be replicated • Appropriate statistical models should be selected • Example: One way or two way ANOVA followed by a Tukey test (Dhileepan, 2003)
V. Long Term Impact Assessment • Ultimate goal of biological control of parthenium is • improvement in crop and pasture yields and qualities. • Recovery of native species • Reduce the socioeconomic Impacts • But, it may take several years to measure such real impact • Requires continuous monitoring & data collection
Major crops and their yields in release areas • Superimposing zonal crop yield data on parthenium distribution map, three major crops identified in potential release areas • Teff • Sorghum and • Maize • Yields vary significantly within zones • District (wereda) level yields could be better • Thus, means of the last 5 seasons used
Other Socio-economic impact assessments: • Impact of biological control of parthenium on human health, livestock health and product qualities, net savings/incomes generated • Determined using well structured questionnaires. • Analyzed with appropriate statistical procedures
Conclusions • The impact of managing parthenium by bioagents can be evaluated from different perspectives: • the establishment and effectiveness of the bioagents , • significant reduction in parthenium populations • subsequent increase in crop/pasture yields & quality, • Improvements in livestock health and quality of their products, • rehabilitation of other plant communities in the ecosystem, and • the additional economic benefits farmers could get from reduced weeding costs and labor.