190 likes | 197 Views
This report provides the completed claim results of EEOICPA compensation through March 2004, with important caveats and considerations. It includes the compensability rates for various cancer models, unknown and multiple primary claims, years worked, age at diagnosis, smoking status, and gender.
E N D
EEOICPA Compensation Results (through March 2004) Russ Henshaw, MS Epidemiologist NIOSH/Office of Compensation Analysis & Support Cincinnati, OH
Completed Claim Results:Important Caveats • Results are through March 31, 2004 • Includes only those cases in which NIOSH has received notice from DOL of an official compensation decision (~ 2/3 of cases) • May NOT be predictive of future results • Unless otherwise noted, results are for claims with only one primary cancer
Completed Claims: Proportion That Were Compensable, by NIOSH-IREP Cancer Model
Completed Claims: Proportion That Were Compensable, by NIOSH-IREP Cancer Model (Cont.)
Completed Claims: Proportion That Were Compensable, by NIOSH-IREP Cancer Model (Cont.)
Completed Claims: Proportion That Were Compensable, by NIOSH-IREP Cancer Model (Cont.)
Completed Claims: Proportion That Were Compensable, by NIOSH-IREP Cancer Model (Cont.)
Completed Claims: Proportion That Were Compensable, by NIOSH-IREP Cancer Model (Cont.)
Completed Claims: Proportion That Were Compensable, by NIOSH-IREP Cancer Model (Cont.)
Compensability Rate, by Cancer Model (10 or More Completed Cases)
Compensability Rate, by Cancer Model (10 or More Completed Cases)
Compensability Rate, by Cancer Model (10 or More Completed Cases) • 0% (no compensable cases): • Esophagus • Stomach • Rectum • Pancreas • Connective tissue • Female genitalia, excluding ovary • All male genitalia • Nervous system • Thyroid
Compensability Rates for “Unknown Primary” and “Multiple Primary” Claims
Proportion of Claims That Were Compensable, by Age at Diagnosis
Lung Cancer Compensability (Single Primary Cancer) by Smoking Status
Lung Cancer Compensability (Single Primary Cancer) by Smoking Status
Summary • Some initial surprises, but current results are skewed: • By dose reconstruction “efficiency process” • Possibly by incomplete data (we are awaiting official decisions from DOL for about 1/3 of all completed cases) • Data will continue to be monitored for trends & anomalies • Results are not predictive of future claims