120 likes | 132 Views
This article explores the need for a new measure of impact for Agricultural Extension programs, focusing on the complexity of behavior change and the antecedents of change. It proposes standardized change indicators as a way to assess the effectiveness of educational interventions in motivating behavioral change. Evaluation is essential for protecting the credibility of Extension programs and demonstrating their worth to society.
E N D
EVALUATION RIGOR: IMPACT DATA Lendel K. Narine, Ph.D. Evaluation Specialist
UNSTANDARDIZED IMPACT • A common measure of Agricultural Extension impact used in many developing countries 100 years ago: AKAP • Awareness • Knowledge • Adoption • Productivity Change • Unlike extension systems around the world, CES is unique to the US • Last 100 years: Land grant goals shifted from technology transfer to human development • Extension now deals with all aspects of human resource development • Can AKAP measure the impact of CES?
Rethinking Impact Does knowledge always lead to adoption? • Examples: • Does knowledge of opioid addiction prevent addiction? • Does knowledge of healthy eating practices lead to healthy eating?
PLANNED CHANGE • After many failed Extension programs (i.e. knowledge gain with no impact) researchers agree on the complexity of change • Rogers (2003) Diffusion of Innovation theory served as a model for Extension in many countries • This theory captures the nuanced nature of change • What we know: Humans are inherently resistant to change • Why is this important? Extension programs are educational interventions aimed at motivating behavioral change • Evaluations should measure CHANGE caused by our educational interventions
How? • What causes behavior change? • How can we measure change? • How can we attribute the cause of change to our program? • These questions are paramount to showing program impact • There’s no impact without change
Reality Check: Logic Models without Logic To claim this We measure this
Evaluation of Planned Change • All Extension programs are focused on change, whether we know it or not • A program is effective only when planned change occur: Our evaluation indicators should be factors of change • Every program is different because it targets different types of change: • An opioid program targets reduction in addiction – What social and psychological changes must happen before this reduction? • An after-school STEM program targets youth interest in STEM careers – How can motivate youth to enter STEM careers? • The standardized impact of Extension is Change, but different Antecedentsof change complicates standardization • Still, we can try!
A Step Forward: Standardized Change Indicators: • Self-efficacy, includes knowledge (Bandura, 1989) • Knowledge, skills, attitudes, aspiration (TOP: Bennett & Rockwell, 2004) • Interest, motivation, expectation (Expectancy-Value: Atkinson, 1957) • Behavioral beliefs/perceptions, norms, barriers (TPB: Azjen, 2002) • Relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, observability, trialability (DOI: Rogers, 2003)
Why • Value/Worth/Funding • Measure the antecedents of change to show an accurate reflection of our program’s worth to society • Future effort • We can assume adoption IF selected antecedents are present - No follow-up need for smaller programs • Publish • Publish your results in a reputable journal • Lead • Lead the Western Region
Webinar: UMN Extension • Evaluation is vital because it protects the integrity of the program delivery organization • External stakeholders • Did not necessarily want to see the evaluations • Wanted to know Extension programs were evaluated and that we know our audiences well • Awareness of a solid evaluation protected credibility
What’s Next? • One-on-one support: Talking Evaluation with Dr. L • Webinars: Monthly • Targeted Professional Development • Statewide Needs Assessment • Evaluation website for educational content • Newsletter/Publication