200 likes | 298 Views
A tool to approximate viability kernels, capture basins and resilience values. Kernel Approximation for VIAbility and Resilience. Written in Java programming language Regular grid / active learning algorithm Capture basins and resilience values are computed in dim d
E N D
A tool to approximate viability kernels, capture basins and resilience values
Kernel Approximation for VIAbility and Resilience • Written in Java programming language • Regular grid / active learning algorithm • Capture basins and resilience values are computed in dim d • Heavy or optimal controllers • Two modes: GUI and batch mode • http://trac.clermont.cemagref.fr/projets/Kaviar/wiki/download#Download
Installation and running http://trac.clermont.cemagref.fr/projets/Kaviar/wiki/download#Download • Requires the java virtual machine (Sun’s JRE environment 5 or later compulsory) • 2 set up • .jar file to test the models already implemented • .zip file to implement new models
GUI mode • Display window • Console window
GUI mode (cont) Dynamical system settings Control bounds Time step Function of the size of the grid Study of the dynamics!!! Viability constraint set
GUI mode (cont) Viability controller config General settings Optimization settings Algorithm type Visualize the individual trajectories - Simple: gradient descent from the minimal values of the controls - Double: min and max values - Conjugate gradient - Double conjugate gradient - Newton method
GUI mode (cont) SVM configuration Stopping criterion of the SVMs computation algorithm SVM algorithm Bandwidth • big C : hard margin(no misclassification) • small C: soft margin Only the gaussian kernel is implemented Control the “smoothness” of the SVM function - Small gamma: smooth - Big gamma: less smooth - C-SMO: see libSVM - Simple SVM - Balk: automative bandwidth tuning - Soft-Balk: balk with soft margin
GUI mode (cont) Execution and control
GUI mode (cont) Indicators + logs
Example on the population problem • Viability kernel approximation • Play with dt, # time steps, # points (and show trajectories) • To obtain a “good” approximation, the dt value must be chosen accordingly the number of points and time steps • Inner approximation sometimes… • Save the results and reload them
Example on the population problem • Controller – Kernel approx with dt = 0.05, 6 time steps, 31 points • A point out of the viability kernel approximation • x0 = 2, y0 = 0.8, 20 time steps, 3 time steps anticipation, 3 distance SVM, dist(K) = 0.025 • Inside the viability kernel • x0 = 2, y0 = 0.5, 150 time steps • More time steps anticipation: 15 • Bigger SVM value: 30 • Same parameters, with 1 time step for the viability kernel approximation
Adding a dynamical system • Creation of a new class file (for instance MyClass.java) • Extend Dynamic_System if viability kernel approximation • Extend Dynamic_System_Target if capture basins approximation • Extend Dynamic_System_Resilience if resilience values • In this class, create a main method to add your model and launch the software Public static void main (String[]args){ //init Kaviar kaviar = new Kaviar(); //Optional: to add default models Kaviar.addModels(Kaviar.DEFAULT_MODEL); //Optional: to add one of the default models //Kaviar.addModels(Population.class); //replace my model by the name of your model Kaviar.addModels(MyModel.class); //Launch the GUI Kaviar.startGUI(); }
MyClass.java (extends Dynamical_System_Resilience) Previous+
Example on the Abrams&Strogatz model • Dynamics and constraints • 2 languages A and B in competition, no bilingual people • σA: density of speakers of language A (in % - [0;1]). • Parameter a: volatility of language A (a > 1 leads a scenario of dominance of 1 language) • Parameter s: prestige of language A (s = 0.5: the two languages are socially equivalent – [0;1]) • Government, institution etc. can play on the prestige of one language, but modifications take time • We consider that one language is endangered when its proportion of speakers is less that 20% • with
Example on the Abrams&Strogatz model • Resilience values • Endangered language doesn’t mean that the language is dead. Is there any action policies that allows the system to recover? • At which cost? • λ = 1: measure the time the system is deprived from its property of interest • λ = c1*time + c2(distance(σA from viability)) • …
Example on the Abrams&Strogatz model • Optimal control • Compute the resilience values with the following parameters: • dt =0.2, dc = 0.5, double optimization, C0 = 1, C1 = 300, 31 points, 6 time steps, inner approx • a = 2: dominance of one language • a = 0.2: stable coexistence • Control of the system: • x0 =0.95, y0= 0.95 and x0 =0.7, y0= 0.95 • Optimal control outside the viability kernel • Heavy control once the system is back to the kernel
Batch mode • .simu files are needed • Create them following a given template • Use the GUI interface • java -cp Kaviar-1.1.jar Appli/Batch Conso.simu • 2 files: .svm + .log files, in the Conso… directory
Batch mode • java -cp Kaviar-1.1.jar Appli/Batch Conso.simu -v • 9*2 files: .svm + .log files, in the Conso… directory