70 likes | 92 Views
Explore the latest developments in D-mixing and CP violation, theory, and experimental results from the 4th Physics of the B-Factories Workshop. Delve into the history, methods, and findings related to these crucial aspects of particle physics.
E N D
D Mixing and CP Violation Status of section section co-editors: Brian Meadows, Boštjan Golob Ikaros Bigi confirmed contributors: A. Zupanc, M. Starič, E. Won R. Andreassen, R. Cowan, K. Flood 4th Physics of the B-Factories Workshop ,Annecy, June 30 – July 1, 2011
Status • D-mixing and CP violation • Theory • Brief history B.M., • Mixing B.G. • CPV B.M., • NP B.G. • General Exp. Remarks • D* tagging B.M., • Decay-t resolution B.G. • Decays to CP eigenstates • Method M.S. • Results KK/ppM.S. • Results KSf+ others A.Z. • Hadronic WS decays • Formalism B.M. • Results KpB.M. • t-dependent Dalitz • Kpp0B.M. • KS h hR.A. • Other multibody R.C. --- draft in SVN --- not yet • Semileptonic • General remarks B.M. • Comparison of results K.F. • tagged/un-tagged K.F: • t-integrated CPV measurements • Using data to measure E.W. • eff. asymmetry • Results KK/ppM.S. • Multi-body (KKp0, ppp0, KKpp) B.M. • T-odd correlations AP?/MM?/BM • t-dependent CPV measurementsAll • SummaryAll
Status • D-mixing and CP violation • Theory • Brief history B.M., • Mixing B.G. • CPV B.M., • NP B.G. • General Exp. Remarks • D* tagging B.M., • Decay-t resolution B.G. • Decays to CP eigenstates • Method M.S. • Results KK/pp M.S. • Results KSf+ others A.Z. 7 pages 2 pages Since Mainz meeting: Introduction to CPV part moved to “Theory” subsection; Small edits; Committed to SVN; Subsection on fKs added; Division of publications among subsections is clear; Assignments to contributors clear
Introduction • D-mixing and CP violation • Theory • Brief history • Mixing • CPV in next • subsect. • NP not yet • General Exp. Remarks • D* tagging • Decay-t resolution • previous estimate (~15 p.) 2x longer 2.5 p. (3.5 p) 2.5 p. (3.5 p.)
Introduction Some Details in Formalism Still Need Discussion General Exp. Remarks starts with decay time evolution as the exp. tool to access the mixing parameters; first order approximation (after full formulae); CPV is small; can/should be moved to “Theory” subsect.?
Introduction Some Details in Formalism Still Need Discussion General Exp. Remarks starts with decay time evolution as the exp. tool to access the mixing parameters; first order approximation (after full formulae); CPV is small; can/should be moved to “Theory” subsect.?
Introduction • Summary • Introductory subsections • (with exception of NP) • almost ready to be discussed • and edited • Plan: • list of references to be divided • among exp. subsect.; • after general part ok → • start work on individual • experimental subsect. • (divide among contributors) • Ask Ikaros to join in !