480 likes | 596 Views
Facilitating farmer participation in timber production. Rowan Reid The University of Melbourne AUSTRALIA With thanks to: The Joint Venture Agroforestry Program & The World Agroforestry Centre. Facilitating farmer participation in timber production. Australia. Vietnam, India, Fiji,
E N D
Facilitating farmer participation in timber production Rowan Reid The University of Melbourne AUSTRALIA With thanks to: The Joint Venture Agroforestry Program & The World Agroforestry Centre
Facilitating farmer participation in timber production Australia Vietnam, India, Fiji, Kenya, Thailand Vietnam
Pre-European Forests Aust Native Veg Assess 2001, http://audit.ea.gov.au/ANRA/vegetation/docs/Native_vegetation/nat_veg_preeuropean.cfm http://www.ga.gov.au/education/facts/dimensions/compare.htm http://audit.ea.gov.au/ANRA/vegetation/vegetation_frame.cfm?region_type=AUS®ion_code=AUS&info=veg_clearing
Clearing for farming: 1850’s- Arable land area Australia = 6% USA = 19% http://audit.ea.gov.au/ANRA/vegetation/vegetation_frame.cfm?region_type=AUS®ion_code=AUS&info=veg_clearing
Land degradationWater Quality Landcare http://audit.ea.gov.au/anra/water/docs/river_assessment/River_assessment.pdf
Industrial Plantation Timber- cleared Ag land http://www.plantations2020.com.au/assets/acrobat/brochure_may2000.PDF
But who owns this land? Private Freehold http://audit.ea.gov.au/anra/people/docs/national/Final%20Audit%20Report%20Vol1.doc
Tree growing projects are about stakeholders needs “Farmers aren’t growing enough trees to combat land degradation.” Or “We need more plantations on farms to underpin future timber supply.”
Farmers are the puppets We know what is required We just need to get farmers to do it
Farmers don’t plant trees for timber • Shelter (Stock/Crops) 75% • Land Protection 50% • Nature Conservation 30% • Aesthetics 10% • Farm timber (fuel,posts) 3% • Commercial timber 1% ABARE ’97, ’00 AFFA ’00 and many others
Trying to change farmers into foresters 9 • Shelter (Stock/Crops) 75% • Land Protection 50% • Nature Conservation 30% • Aesthetics 10% • Farm timber (fuel,posts) 3% • Commercial timber 1% ABARE ’97, ’00 AFFA ’00 and many others
R&DRecipes for Dissemination • Identify timber best-bets • Suitability maps • Economic Analysis • Demonstrations • Publicity • Training
Time: The big impediment • Cash Flow • Risk • Uncertainty • Lack of Proof
Direct Incentives • cost share payments • discounted credit • free inputs (eg trees) • tax concessions • cash/food for labour • But that’s another paper: • http://www.mtg.unimelb.edu.au/publications.htm
Farmer non-adoption is active rejection Not on my place Bruce What you reckon Joe?
Farmers know they can’t compete in ‘this’ game Market power and price Costs and Risk Farmers Corporate growers Increasing Scale of Production
Maybe farmers are only good for their land Land sale Land lease Joint Ventures
Timber plantations in Australia Total plantation area = 1.4 million ha Wood, et al (2001) Plantations of Australia – A report from the National Plantation Inventory and the National Farm Forest Inventory, National Forest Inventory, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. www.brs.gov.au
Plantations on farmers’ land Total area on farmer-owned land is 360,000 Ha 4% of Total Estate Wood, et al (2001) Plantations of Australia – A report from the National Plantation Inventory and the National Farm Forest Inventory, National Forest Inventory, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. www.brs.gov.au
Land sales = conflict Leave with ‘dignity’!
Lease Arrangements Regular payments No (Low) Economic Risk Requires legal framework Farmer has little control
Joint Venture Arrangements Profit Share Forestry Rights Legislation Farmer can influence result
What’s wrong with these? Nothing really…except same picture / same place OK If this suits the farmers BUT It suits very few
The other timber game? Where Farmers have a Comparative Advantage? Costs and Risk Rewards to growers Farmers Industrials
Independent family forestryTaking Off! Nationally Yan Yan Gurt Catchment Study 1990 – 1% planted 2002 – 16% planted (10 families) Wood, et al (2001) Plantations of Australia – A report from the National Plantation Inventory and the National Farm Forest Inventory, National Forest Inventory, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. www.brs.gov.au
Farmer/Family timber production is different Fitting timber into the farming landscape Not replacing it! Different R&D needs
Economics is different Conventional test: Net Present Value/ha • 3 tests for farmers: • Is it viable to • Plant? • Own? • Harvest?
Viable to Plant Farmer Practice http://www.ameriteak.com/services.htm Best Practice
Viable to Plant DCF Analysis Best Practice Farmer Practice http://www.ameriteak.com/services.htm
Viable to Plant Common Sense Opportunistic Complementary Low risk Cheap in $ Labour? Enhances capital Best Practice Farmer Practice http://www.ameriteak.com/services.htm
Viable to Own • Build or Underpin Capital • Supports Ag production • Reduces risk • Equates with ‘good’ • Time is less of an issue • EVEN IF IT TAKES LONGER • OR PRODUCES LESS WOOD
Viable to Harvest Return > (Cost + Compensation)
Harvest costs • - Market access • ‘Appropriate’ equipment and skill • Piece size and value • Economies of scale http://www.bambooliving.com/vietharvest.html
A viable harvest 6 years 15 years
Different timber markets • Market access • Same spp – diff. wood • Point of sale/method • Labelling Thailand Fijian Mahogany in Europe PNG http://www.alastairmcintosh.com/images/png2.htm#nsp%20logging
Farmers get what’s left • Value adding • Mill efficiency/skills • Resource security • Monopoly India
New Markets - Services • Need a buyer, measure and mechanism • Property Rights • Ongoing (Carbon trap) • Reward proportional to service Vietnam http://www.photo.net/us/ne/foliage-backroads
D&D Research Support ‘viable to plant’ Processes underlying need The Role of Trees Design Principles Multipurpose management
Technical ResearchConfidence & Management • New products • Genetics • Silviculture • Harvesting • Marketing • Processing • Value adding Thailand http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/Index.htm#Agroforestry___Farm
Legislation/Regulation • Land Tenure • Personal reward • (Capital/Income) • Forestry Rights • Outcome based • codes of practice • Landholder • responsibility Fiji Vietnam
Extension/Education Knowledge networks Ownership or decision Commitment
Demonstrations The landholder… Not the trees Kenya Vietnam
Evolution not Expansion Multifunctional landscapes evolve to reflect community aspirations and resources Vietnam Vietnam
Timber could well be a part of it Teak - India
Australian Agroforestry R&D Publications http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/Index.htm#Agroforestry___Farm • Design principles – shelter, land deg., biodiversity • Species search (Low rainfall and native timbers) • Product development (Biomass, Composite, Solid) • Multipurpose Design • Environmental Service Markets • Social research and extension • Environmental Risks (Genetic polution, Water etc) • Over 100 reports in last 4 years