1 / 10

Public Health Reporting Initiative – Stage 3 Sprint

Public Health Reporting Initiative – Stage 3 Sprint. SPRINT Objective. Create an implementation specification for public health reporting that can be tested and implemented in time for Stage 3 Testing by late fall-early winter 2012 Implementation of reporting by Oct 2015

naida
Download Presentation

Public Health Reporting Initiative – Stage 3 Sprint

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Public Health Reporting Initiative – Stage 3 Sprint

  2. SPRINT Objective • Create an implementation specification for public health reporting that can be tested and implemented in time for Stage 3 • Testing by late fall-early winter 2012 • Implementation of reporting by Oct 2015 • Specification can serve multiple report types: focused on shared “core” elements • Supports collection of an “extended” set of data elements • Largely compatible with needs of a larger number of report types

  3. What Maximizes Benefit to All? • An implementation specification required for certification of Stage 3 EHRs that • Provides immediate benefit to some reporting programs • Establishes conditions that will benefit other reporting programs

  4. PHRI User Story Implementation Guide Candidates

  5. Proposal • Tier 1: 7 stories appear with relatively high level of readiness; focus on unidirectional; broad national scope • Tier 2: 5 stories with either less readiness and/or more complex scope (e.g., bidirectional exchange, referral)

  6. Stage 3 Readiness Sub-workgroup:Goal • Create an implementation specification for consideration to be included in stage 3 • “Core” spec + Extensions • 7 Tier 1 candidates • 5 Tier 2 participants (defer to Tier 1 consensus) EHR, PH, and Intermediary System Vendors Tier 2 Agencies & Associations Tier 1 Agencies & Associations

  7. Possible Process • Set ground rules • Build consensus on common “core” data elements • Develop consensus on format - HL7 2.x, CDA or both • Address how “core” elements and different “extension” elements are managed • Address how “trigger” and “filter” knowledge base should function • Document decisions in Implementation Guide (support team) • Review progress in weekly checkpoints

  8. Members and Support Team • Lead: Seth Foldy • Members: • User Story Submitters • Federal Agency Reps • Association / Member Reps • EHR Vendors / PH IT vendors / staff • Support Team • Erik Pupo, SME • Brian Castor, PM • Lindsay Brown, Business Analyst • Ashley Swain, ShalinaWadhani – IG Technical Writing

  9. Timeline / Commitment • Estimated time commitment: • Meeting: 1.5 – 2 hours per week • Homework: 1 - 2 hours per week • If you are interested in helping with this work, email lrbrown@cdc.gov

  10. Risks / Dependencies • Aggressive timeline • Member (or proxy) participation • Possibility of forking • Base Standard “fit” • Future dependency: Pilot setting

More Related