E N D
1. TERMINAL DEHYDRATION Presented by Andrea J. Carpitcher, R.N.
Northeastern State University
EBP Symposium
April 23, 2010
henson_andi@yahoo.com
3. IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEM
TERMINAL DEHYDRATION vs. ARTIFICIAL HYDRATION
In end of life care
4. PICO
Among terminally ill patients, does terminal dehydration, as compared to continuing or initiating artificial fluids, therapeutically benefit the patient and family and foster a more peaceful death?
5. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
6. Lack of Communication Skills
Doctors
Medical Students (Mutto, et al., 2009)
Dr.’s Personal Experience (Schmidlin, 2008)
7. Lack of Communication Skills
Nurses
Need for EBP Foundation
Teach unbiased research
Convey compassion with confidence
Time Management
Enhance intimacy of Nurse-Patient Relationships
8. End of Life Decisions Abandoned
9. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Terminal Dehydration vs. Artificial Hydration
10. Support ofTERMINAL DEHYDRATION
(Plonk & Arnold, 2007)
Dry Mouth - with otherwise peaceful death
11. Support of TERMINAL DEHYDRATION
(Sutcliffe & Holmes. 1994)
Cerebral Anoxia
Extreme Electrolyte Imbalances
Natural Analgesia
High Quantity Release of Opioid Peptides
Caloric Deprivation = Ketone Accumulation
12. Support of TERMINAL DEHYDRATION
(Morita & Satoshi, 2003)
Inconclusive Data to Support cause of Terminal Delirium
Concluded Artificial Hydration does not likely enhance quality of life in the terminally ill
13. Nursing Considerations withTerminal Dehydration
Decreased need for Catheters
Decreased risk for IV infiltration
Decreased risk for Skin Breakdown
Increased need for Oral Care
14. Support ofArtificial Hydration
(Lanuke, Fainsinger, & deMoissac, 2004)
Is not life-prolonging = Standard of Care
Without Artificial Hydration
Renal Failure
Opioid Metabolite Accumulation
Confusion, Irritability, Agitation
15. Support ofArtificial Hydration
(Blakely & Millward, 2007)
Moral Dilemma
16. Nursing Considerations withArtificial Hydration
Increased Need for Catheters
Increased Risk for IV infiltrations
Possible Decrease of Dry Mouth
Possible Decrease of Family Anguish associated with Moral Dilemma of hydration
17. RECOMMENDED PROTOCOL
18. STUDENT RECOMMENDATION Nurses need to be well educated on what the research is and their findings and seek to develop a relationship of trust with the patient and family. Then use the knowledge of the research findings to help guide decision making.
Nurses must express intuitiveness in knowing patients and their caregivers as individuals
19. Rationale
(Mok & Chin, 2004)
Fosters therapeutic Nurse-Patient Relationship
TRUST
RAPPORT
Greater sense of Reward
20. Strategic Approach Informative In-Service for Staff of GSH
To gain sound knowledge of EB Reviews
Inclusion of topic to Admission Process to GSH
Graceful initiative to discuss patient and caregiver
Informative Literature for patients and caregivers
Pamphlets, Videos, Websites
21. Methods of Evaluation
QAPI System of Good Shepherd Hospice
Data collection upon patient surveys
Patient Interpretation of Nurse-Patient Relationship
Was Artificial Hydration addressed at admission
Nursing Self-Evaluation Tool
Knowledge Competency Level of EB Research
Assess depth of patient relationship
22. SUGGESTIONS for FURTHER STUDY
23. Further clinical research needed to conclude position
Likely, topic will remain in controversy
Research vs Patient Perception
Cultural Sensitivity
Illness before Disease
24. NEW RESEARCH QUESTION
Among terminally ill patients, do affects of terminal dehydration vary among different terminal diagnoses and foster a peaceful death for some and burdensome one for others?