Asset Management

1. Asset Management

2. Asset Inventory • Inventory of assets maintained by the agency • Critical for determining assets to be managed • Foundation for building annual budget

3. Asset Inventory GIS Map Feature Extraction Barrier Wall Signs Mowing Area Rumble Strips Pavement Markings

4. Asset Inventory • Features extracted to database

5. Asset Inventory • Inventory imported to MMS • Budget distributed to counties based on inventory

6. Asset Management

7. Level of Service • Defines the amount of maintenance required to manage assets at a specified level • Should be supported at all levels of management within the agency • TDOT needs to tie Level of Service to the Condition Assessment to ensure that appropriate funding and resources are allocated to achieve target goals

8. Level of Service • Percent of assets maintained per year to achieve desired service level • Example: • Percent of signs replaced • Percent of pavement miles resurfaced • Frequency of performed maintenance on an asset • Example: • Number of mowing and litter cycles

9. Level of Service

10. Asset Management

11. Condition Assessment • How well are we maintaining our infrastructure? • Quantitative evaluation of the condition of assets • Should be analyzed and used to reallocate resources and funding to meet your asset management goals

12. Condition Assessment • TDOT uses a condition assessment program called the Maintenance Rating Index (MRI) • Random sample of roadway network • Approximately 6% of roadway miles evaluated each year • 7,107 1/10th mile segments assessed in FY 2010

13. Condition Assessment • Evaluates all roadway characteristics monthly • Each characteristic has weighting factor used to generate a score • Pass/Fail based on whether it meets the minimum condition standard • Score from 0 to 100 • Target score is 90

14. Condition Assessment • 10% of segments evaluated by third party consultant for quality assurance • In-house scores ~ 90 • QA scores ~ 82 • Red trend line should match up to black line if QA & In-house scores were similar • Red line shift indicates higher In-house scores • Concentration of points with In-House score of 100 & QA score considerably lower is a concern In-House vs. QA Score

15. Condition Assessment Strengths Weaknesses • Satisfies GASB 34 requirement • Quantitative evaluation instead of subjective opinion • Provides for opportunity to find deficiencies that windshield inspection may miss • Data indicates that In-House self-evaluation has lead to elevated scores • May need to consider using impartial third party to perform inspections in the future

16. Asset Management

17. Maintenance Management System • Implemented in July 2005 • Better Accountability • Ability to compare In-House Cost vs. Contract Cost • Provides documentation for: • Liability Claims • Federal Reimbursement • FEMA • FHWA – Emergency Relief • Approx. $8 Million for rockslides in 2009 & 2010 • Approx. $40 Million for May 1-2, 2010 flood

18. Future • Link Condition Assessment to Level of Service & Budget • Letter Grade Scale for Level of Service to simplify the communication of current condition and resource needs to achieve goals Source: North Carolina DOT, 2006 Report on the Condition of the State Highway System

19. Future • 3D mesh model of 13th Ave. @ I-40 in Downtown Nashville built from LiDAR data

20. Future • Street view

21. Future • 3D mesh with photolog overlay

22. Future • Fly through 3D model instead of driving through photolog

23. Future • Pan/Tilt/Zoom • View roadway assets from any angle

24. Future • Measurement tool allows for measurement of objects such as lane width, sign dimension, cut slope height, vertical/horizontal clearance, etc.