90 likes | 101 Views
The Peja Household Travel Survey from 2010 reveals insights on how people travel within Peja, highlighting vehicle ownership, home-to-work and home-to-school travel distances, and relationships between mode choice and distance. The survey emphasizes the importance of infrastructure like cycling lanes and urban public transport to reduce car dependence in the expanding city.
E N D
How do people travel in Peja? Results from the PejaHousehold Travel Survey, 2010 MobKos II - Mission 2 - September 2010 - Kobe Boussauw
1. Household composition • on average 5,2 family members: • 1,4 are working • 1,6 go to school
2. Vehicle ownership • 22% of households do not own a car • 0,93 cars per family (high) => 0,18 cars per individual (low) • cars are quite old (14 years) • very little bicycles are avaible: 59% of families do not have a bike, while only 10% has more than one
3. Home-to-work travel • average distance is 3,9 km (very short) and 95% lives less than 10 km away • only 2% is employed outside Peja regio, 1% in Pristina • average travel time is 16 min (quite short) • 60% walks, 6% by bike, 30% by car
4. Home-to-school travel • average distance is 4,8 km (quite short) and 95% lives less than 5 km away • 4% is studying outside Peja regio, mostly in Pristina • average travel time is 21 min (quite normal) • 92% walks, 6% by bus
5. School travel: school survey • the school survey by the ngo “Safe Trip” shows slightly different results, since also children from outside the city are included • survey covers almost 7000 primary school pupils • 85% walks, 10% by car, 3% by bus and 3% by bike
6. Relationships between mode and distance: work travel • in short distance classes, shorter trips are linked to walking and longer trips are linked to driving • in long distance classes, longer trips are also associated with use of the bus
7. Relationships between mode and distance: school travel • in short distance classes, shorter trips are strongly linked to walking (longer trips are linked to car use, but weaker relationship) • in long distance classes, longer trips are strongly associated with use of the bus
8. Conclusion and policy implications • short internal distances in the city are important • so the amount of cars can be limited in the future • thus, compact and mixed urban development is important • BUT: • the city is expanding anyway • so, cycling should be encouraged and urban public transport should be introduced to reduce car dependence