1 / 35

TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH SICKLE CELL DISEASE (1983-2005)

Study on total hip replacement in sickle cell patients <40 years, analyzing complications, anatomical abnormalities, risk factors, and outcomes.

nashr
Download Presentation

TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH SICKLE CELL DISEASE (1983-2005)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH SICKLE CELL DISEASE(1983-2005) P. Hernigou Hospital Henri Mondor 94000 Créteil 336 hips(M=15/year since 22 years)

  2. SICKLE CELL DISEASE

  3. SICKLE CELL DISEASE Total hip replacement in such patients who are less than forty years old has been associated with high rates of complications and revisions. Also, the majority of such patients with sickle cell disease have been reported to have a high prevalence of failure of components fixation The purpose of the present study was to analyze the results after primary total hip arthroplasty with cement in a group of patients who had sickle cell disease

  4. Problems • anatomic abnormalities • infection of the hip during childhood • Transfusions and anemia • Allo immunisation • Pulmonary Infarctus • Revisions

  5. The anatomic abnormalities • The anatomic abnormalities may include • abnormal location of neurovascular structures secondary to soft-tissue contractures, • an abnormal location of the hip center, • a limb-length discrepancy, • a small acetabulum and femoral canal • increased anteversion of the proximal part of the femur.

  6. Medullary osteonecrosis

  7. Risk Factors of Intraoperative perforation of the femur

  8. Levels of Deformity Femoral Neck Deformity Greater Trochanteric Deformity

  9. Levels of Deformity Metaphyseal Deformityas a result of an osteotomy.

  10. Diaphyseal Deformity

  11. OSTEOTOMIES 20 ans

  12. dysplastic acetabulum

  13. dysplastic acetabulum

  14. dysplastic acetabulum

  15. Coxa profonda

  16. Problems • anatomic abnormalities • infection of the hip during childhood • Transfusions and anemia • Allo immunisation • Pulmonary Infarctus • Revisions

  17. 10 hips in patients who had had infection of the hip during childhood All the hips had cemented total hip replacements. The age of the patients at the time that the infection was contracted was an average of 12 years). The average age of the patients at the time of the total hip arthroplasty was 32.4 years. The interval between active infection and arthroplasty was 24 years. All the hips had a quiescent period of infection of more than ten years. The average duration of follow-up was 8 years (range, five to fifteen years). Two hips had recurrence of infection.

  18. infections

  19. Fémur anormal inégalité

  20. Problems • anatomic abnormalities • infection of the hip during childhood • Transfusions and anemia • Allo immunisation • Pulmonary Infarctus • Revisions

  21. Transfusions:risk of allo-immunisation

  22. pulmonary Infarctus

  23. Problems • anatomic abnormalities • infection of the hip during childhood • Transfusions and anemia • Allo immunisation • Pulmonary Infarctus • Revisions

  24. Results:336 hips average follow-up: 10 years(10 to 20) 60 THA >10 years

  25. Surgery at 18 years oldfollowup: 22 years

  26. Followup: 22 years

  27. Followup: 22 years

  28. 336 protheses Revisions: 6 % 22 revisions Infections 3 1 revision 7 2 revisions 2 3 revisions 1 4 revisions 3

  29. Risk of iterative revisions

  30. Conclusion • The management of hip arthroplasty with sickle cell disease requires recognition of anatomical deformities • Assessment begins in the preoperative period with recognition of significant risk factors, including previous surgery systemic medical conditions, as well as selection of suitable components.

More Related