320 likes | 456 Views
Neutral kaon WG other activities. Volounteered Rapporteur: F. Bossi. Coherent K S regeneration K L branching ratios K L 0 0 and QCAL. Coherent K S regeneration. M. Antonelli A. De Santis A. Di Domenico. INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati
E N D
Neutral kaon WG other activities Volounteered Rapporteur: F. Bossi • Coherent KSregeneration • KL branching ratios • KL 00 and QCAL
Coherent KS regeneration M. AntonelliA. De Santis A. Di Domenico INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Physics Dept. University of Rome “La Sapienza” & INFN RM1 CP wg meeting 22 November 2002
Coherent regeneration Coherent regeneration occurs only in the strictly forward direction: This interference term is important for thin regenerators, i.e. when |rcoh| ~ |h±| as for the beam pipe and inner DC walls
Event selection Data sample : DST of 2001 and 2002 integrated luminosity: 340 pb-1 • Preliminary selection: • KS - sqrt(x2+y2) < 5 cm AND |z| < 10 cm • - |Minv - MK| < 5 MeV • KL -two track vertex inside a 40 cm radius sphere • - vertex inside 20 degree cone around extrapolated KL direction from PKs. • kinematic fit to improve KS KL vertex position • (the same as in interferometry study – M. Antonelli & A. Sibidanov)
Event selection Emiss (MeV) • | |PKL| - |Pp+p-| | < 5 MeV • |Emis + (Minv-MK0)| < 5 MeV Only scalar quantities used for the selection criteria in order to avoid distortion of angular distribution of the incoherent regeneration bkg. Minv (MeV)
q Regenerator PKL Background Pp+p- Beam pipe Resolution fixed incoherent regeneration q cut • Background evaluation: • angular distribution of incoherent • regeneration is assumed flat • (in solid angle) in the small q region • fit of incoherent regeneration • background and subtraction • cut q < 0.04 • Km3 background negligible • (checked with data) q (rad) DC inner wall Resolution fixed incoherent regeneration q cut q (rad)
signal + bkg bkg Background subtraction Incoherent regeneration bkg smeared according to MC and with data for q >qcut t / tS t / tS
Efficiency • Only relative variation of the efficiency are relevant. • (Normalization to through |h±|). • a preliminary MC study does not shows dramatic changes in the region of interest (M. Antonelli-A. Sibidanov): more accurate studies needed !
fit results Fit function: P(t) folded with MC resolution Beam pipe fit results: c2 = 27.6/15 |r| = (6.5 ±2.2) ·10-4 f = -1.05 ± 0.25 rad
fit results DC inner wall fit results: c2 = 14.0 / 15 |r| = (16.6 ± 6.6) ·10-4 f = -1.19 ± 0.27 rad
fit results DC inner wall Red curve: incoherent regeneration (only decay term) Black curve:coherent regeneration (decay and interference term)
fit result : phase DC inner wall The fit result is quite sensitive to the rcoh phase, due to the interference term
fit results: result stability vs q cut fit results as a function of the q cut parameter For comparison: horizontal lines are the Baldini-Michetti evaluations
Conclusion • Theoretical evaluations (Baldini-Michetti) compatible with • preliminary results • - more work to do on: • - Efficiency evaluation • - Refine Km3 and incoherent regeneration background • evaluation • - Complete analysis with full Kloe statistics
Our Christmas present to Paolo F. : We will measure absolute branching ratios
Status of the measurement of KL pln,p+p-branching ratios M. Antonelli, M. Dreucci, M. Moulson CP meeting 16-12-2002
Introduction • Problems in both measurements: • tag bias (common to all KL BR measurements) • tracking efficiency • Additional Problems KL p+p-: • momentum calibration • momentum resolution • ( semileptonic event selections • needs looser kinemtic cuts)
Tag bias Ks p+p-selection: Rt<10cm ;|z|<20 cm |m-mK|<5 MeV; |p*-p*K|<10 MeV e 63% • Main bias is expected from trigger • require trigger from ks pions: • clusters connected to fired trigger sector • no other cluster in “ks sectors” (avoid overlaps) • no splitted pion tracks (T2CL asso. quality) • + ks direction far from beam line (cos(q)>0.9) 39% 25% 20%
e KLtag 63% standard 39% Ks trigger 25% + overlaps 20% + tracks q. Ks dir. Tag bias: MC results Relative KS +- efficiency for various KL process KL p0p0p0 KL All KL p+p-p0 in FV KL en out FV Crash included KL mn +/- 1%
Tag bias: cont. • General : • Main KL decay mode can be measured with • “unbiased” tag. • Rare decays can be normalized to main one • Prospects: • a <1% biased tag available • compare with data (neutral vs charged Kltag) • for more studies we need good simulation of: • KL “shower”, fragments, • machine bkg. inclusion (soon)
Tracking efficiency Double tag method ( from KL p+p- analysis) Conditional efficiency N2/N1 from data KS p+p-
Data-MC comparison “Efficiency” dependence for about 20 variables (2000 data) just few examples efficiency definition = (# 2 tag events)/(# >0 tag events) DATA MC 0 206 MeV 0 206 MeV DATA MC
Data-MC comparison cont. No clear dependencies found DATA MC BUT Eff. vs <Hot rate>(Khz)
Kinematics Pmiss (MeV) Emiss (MeV)
QCAL infos and KL p0p0 search Caterina Bloise
QCAL infos and KL p0p0 search Can QCAL play any role in the KL p0p0search? Two items have been considered : background reduction knowledge of the distributions useful to separate signal and background 4-clusters sample ( last 115 pb-1 of the 2002 DAQ campaign) has been analyzed Results: QCAL is marginal for the background reduction QCAL-tagged background is crucial for the knowledge of the distributions of the 3p0 contamination.
QCAL infos and KL p0p0 search Likelihood Ratio - 4-clusters events (53.5 pb-1) Background selection: signal contamination evaluation Plot 1 : shape of the difference between events selected with DT < 20 ns and those with DT < 10 ns Plot 2 : shape of the difference between events selected with DT < 10 ns and those with DT < 5 ns Plot 3 : shape of the difference between events selected with DT < 5 ns and those with DT < 3 ns Black area : shape of the events selected requiring DT < 3 ns 1 2 Events / 2. 3
QCAL infos and KL p0p0 search Likelihood Ratio - 4-clusters events (115 pb-1) Black histogram : Entire sample distribution Blue histogram : Event distribution without tagged sample by QCAL Events / 0.5 Background reduction is modest : 14884 events / ~66000 ~22% of the contamination is tagged by QCAL requiring at least one hit in time DT < 5 ns
QCAL infos and KL p0p0 search Likelihood Ratio - 4-clusters events MC Events / 0.5 Black histogram : MC distribution for the entire background sample 15313 simulated events Red points : MC distribution for the QCAL tagged background - 3598 events
QCAL infos and KL p0p0 search Likelihood Ratio - 4-clusters events QCAL vs MC shape Events / 0.5 Black histogram : MC distribution for the entire background sample 15313 simulated events Red points : QCAL tagged background in 115 pb-1 - 14884 events
QCAL infos and KL p0p0 search Likelihood Ratio - 4-clusters events (115 pb-1) 4-clusters events (black points) 59794 collected in ~ 115 pb –1 Signal shape from MC 18208 simulated events Background shape from QCAL 14884 collected events Fit results : Signal (red histogram): 8570 220 ev Background: 51225 510 ev c2 : 459/356 Blue histogram is the sum of signal and background from fit results Events / 0.5
CONCLUSIONS The QCAL information is crucial for the knowledge of the background behaviour It is also important to increase its efficiency in order to achieve a better statistical accuracy on the interesting distributions