1 / 16

Primary MCQ Course Evaluation

Primary MCQ Course Evaluation. January 2012. Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar graphs . Total no. candidates:34. Day1 :23 rd January 2012. Day 2 :24 th January 2012. Day 3: 25 th January 2012.

Download Presentation

Primary MCQ Course Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Primary MCQ Course Evaluation January 2012

  2. Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar graphs. Total no. candidates:34 Mean score, maximum being 5

  3. Day1 :23rd January 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5

  4. Day 2 :24th January 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5

  5. Day 3: 25th January2012 Mean score, maximum being 5

  6. Overall value of the course 1= waste of money/time, 5 being excellent y axis represents number of candidates

  7. Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation 1: very poor 2: poor 3: Satisfactory 4: good 5: excellent y axis represents number of candidates

  8. Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation 1: very poor 2: poor 3: Satisfactory 4: good 5: excellent y axis represents number of candidates

  9. Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation

  10. Value of pre-course MCQ Practice1= very poor, 5 being excellent y axis represents number of candidates

  11. Comments: Pharmacology • Very clear and good introduction Clear and concise, good slides • Well presented, answered questions well, Very clear, good explanation • Good slides - good explanations of answers - concise • Very knowledgeable Excellent Very good! Explained every answers whether T or F

  12. Comments: Physics • Good slides, well presented Excellent, should have been in the morning when we are fresh • Extremely useful Very informative, knew topic very well. Clarified ambiguities I had • Well explained Good to have SBA practice • Good All well presented, answered questions appropriately

  13. Comments: Physiology • Much better day. Good speaker - all clear and a sense of humor! Good explanation of answers. Excellent, clear and concise and enjoyable! Answered questions, very knowledgeable • Very approachable, clear answers to questions asked Excellent Thank you! The presentation was very clear, easy to understand and follow

  14. Comments:General • Lecture handouts are something that I feel really lacked, in order to help keep up the material. • Turning point SBA devices were great fun, interactive and helpful. • Very well organised with a lot of effort put in to organise the course. • High quality teaching, very informed lecturers.. Mean score, maximum being 5

  15. Comments:General • Practice papers very useful, questions very challenging • Good length (3 days) • Dr xx has written good SBA's in preparation for exam, majority topics covered would like more cardiovascular and respiratory physiology questions. Mean score, maximum being 5

  16. Post exam feedback • Thanks for all your support during and after the course • pharmacology MCQs were a little challenging • Many MCQ's and SBA's were totally new • Thanks for all the help for my preparation • SBA questions were tough. Coventry classes were useful. • Thank you for the encouragement. Yes it went well today

More Related