1 / 16

Dialogue-Innovation-Future An experience of the Pharmaceutical Forum

Dialogue-Innovation-Future An experience of the Pharmaceutical Forum. Dr Stefaan Van der Spiegel, MD Competitiveness in the Pharmaceuticals Industry and Biotechnology DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission. Dialogue-Innovation-Future The role of the Health sector

natan
Download Presentation

Dialogue-Innovation-Future An experience of the Pharmaceutical Forum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dialogue-Innovation-Future An experience of the Pharmaceutical Forum Dr Stefaan Van der Spiegel, MD Competitiveness in the Pharmaceuticals Industry and Biotechnology DG Enterprise and Industry European Commission Dialogue-Innovation-Future The role of the Health sector Warsaw, 5 December 2007

  2. EXPERIENCES OF THE FORUM • Different expectations… • … though much can be realised

  3. DIFFERENT EXPECTATIONS… Funding authority: a choice to invest in future health of the population 1 Investment in innovative medicines 2 3 Manufacturers: a reward for risky investement in R&D Patient: a necessary step to get access to a new treatment

  4. 1. PHARMACEUTICAL EXPENDITURE TAKES SIGNIFICANT PART OF WEALTH (Total* expenditure / GDP) Different driving factors possible e.g., level of GDP, local health situation/ needs, public coverage, … * Publicly and privately funded Source: 2002 data OECD except CY,ES,LT,LV,MT,SL 2004 data by Alcimed and Member States

  5. 1. HIGH GROWTH RATES OF EXPENDITURE IN MS % annual growth* 00-03 • 7-8% /year, up to 10-15% /year in CEE • Demand grows faster than budgets can (ageing population, demanding and informed citizens, high cost of new technologies, …) • Each Euro can only be spend once, hence need for cost-containment • Impact of orphan medicines, individualized therapies, … ? * Total expenditure, publicly and privately funded Source: OECD except CY,ES,LT,LV,MT,SL data by Alcimed and Member States

  6. RESEARCH CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT M.A. + + = 2-3 1-2 Time (years) 5-7 8-12 >10,000 molecules Up to 800 million Euro Success rate ~10 candidate medicines 1 new medicine Investment (Millions €) 2. CREATING A NEW MEDICINE REQUIRES SIGNIFICANT UPFRONT INVESTMENT

  7. 2. RETURN ON THIS INVESTMENT DEPENDS ENTIRELY ON P&R DECISIONS THEORETICAL EXAMPLE Real revenue impacted by changing P&R decisions individual countries, e.g., timing of decisions/approvals, prescription conditions, … Return on investment Expected revenue Time (years) • SME’s (Biotech) are vulnerable • to P&R policy changes as they … • … depend on a single product • … limit nr of markets/countries Exclusivity Period

  8. Reim- bursed Total price Co-paid 3. P&R DECISION DEFINES ECONOMIC ACCESS FOR PATIENT • Positive list: • XYZ • ABC • DEF • …

  9. 3. TIMING OF P&R DECISION DEFINES AVAILABILITY Time between Market Authorisation and P&R decision • Significant (>1 year) differences in timing of P&R decisions between Member States • Driving factors with industry as well as with authorities • Max 180 days for national procedures (EU-law) V U T S R Q P O N M L K J I H G F E D C B Country A 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Number of days * Defined by when medicine gets a pricing and reimbursement decision in a MS Source: IMS, Marketing Autorisation 30/6/2000 to 30/6/2004

  10. EXPERIENCES OF THE FORUM • Different expectations… • … though much can be realised

  11. INCREASING MUTUAL KNOWLEDGE ON PRICING PRACTICES: TOOLBOX • Pricing practices • Reference pricing • Payback • Price control • Prescription guidelines • Cost sharing • Generic policies • … • Questions and answers from and to participants in the Working Group: • Expected benefits? • Practical set-up? • Risks, interactions, success factors? • … Study « Differences and Commonalities in Pricing and Reimbur- sementin the EU » by the Andalusian School of Public Health

  12. GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF THE WG PRICING • Control of expenditure • Reward for R&D investment • Access to health solutions • Potential of free pricing • Align demand side • Leverage generics • Set expectations • Recognise innovation • Be consistent • Ensure timely access • Ensure availability in all markets • Ensure affordability for all EU citizens 1 2 3

  13. INCREASING TRANSPARENCY OF PRICES • 15 products of interest • (most-selling, recent • innovations, …) • A • B • C • D • … • Made comparable: • Per active substance • Per daily dosis • Levels of price • (ex-factory, • wholesale, • pharmacist) • Info collected • from 22 MS + Feedback Scope can be expanded Will be repeated on regular basis

  14. AN OVERVIEW OF THE VALUE OF INNOVATIONDifferent and Common Expectations • Morbidity, mortality • Side effects, drug-interactions • Probability and speed of recovery • … • Pain-management • Self-management at home • Social possibilities • … Therapeutic / Clinical • Pandemias, drug-resistance • Cost of medication • Overall treatment costs • Non-healthcare spending • Cost of sick-leave, productivity • … Quality of Life Socio-Economic

  15. HARMONIZING ASSESSMENTS OF INNOVATIVE MEDICINES Assessment- methodology 1 • Inputs • Data A • Study B • … 3 Results +/- €/$ 2 • Completion of data-sets at moment of decision • Extra sources, better data-generation • (Standardisation?) • … • Choice of treatment comparator • Clarifications • Type of benefits to consider • Costs to include • Time horizon • Harmonisation, mutual understanding • … • Variation in outcome assessment • One of the bases for national P&R decisions • THOUGH, differences in national P&R decisions, as many factors are locally driven

  16. DIALOGUE HAS A LOT TO OFFER 1 Funding authority: most effective allocation of scarce resources Investing in innovation 2 3 Manufacturers: guidance on what innovation is most needed and rewarded Patients: access to the most valuable innovative treatments

More Related