1 / 31

UTILIZING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK IN GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA

UTILIZING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK IN GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA. INTRODUCTION. Team City of Greensboro HDR Constructors Garney Capital Improvement Needs Townsend WTP TZO WRF CMAR vs. Alternate Delivery Methods. PROJECT BACKGROUND.

nate
Download Presentation

UTILIZING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK IN GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UTILIZINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK IN GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA

  2. INTRODUCTION • Team • City of Greensboro • HDR Constructors • Garney • Capital Improvement Needs • Townsend WTP • TZO WRF • CMAR vs. Alternate Delivery Methods

  3. PROJECT BACKGROUND • Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) in Greensboro • Owner Objectives / Goals • RFQ Process • CM Selection • Design and Partnering • Designer and CM • Pre-Construction Timeline

  4. DESIGN-BID-BUILD • Traditional Baseline for Project Delivery • Proven Procurement Solution • DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS PROCESS

  5. Design-Bid-Build ADVANTAGES • Competitively Bid • Separate Contracts • Self-Performance Capabilities • Time-Tested Process / Used in All States • Maximizes Owner Input • DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

  6. Design-Bid-Build DISADVANTAGES • Limited Collaboration / Teamwork • Eliminates Qualifications-Based Selection • No Contractual Relationship • Adversarial Approach • Low Bid • Value Engineering • Design • DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

  7. DESIGN-BUILD • Design and Construction Fixed Price • Based on Concept Design and/or Description from Procurement Documents • DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS • CONSTRUCTION PROCESS

  8. Design-Build ADVANTAGES • Team Qualifications-Based Selection • Accelerated Schedule • Public Acceptance for Lump-Sum Contract • Self-Performing Contractor Controls Schedule • Known Performance Criteria • Final GMP • DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

  9. Design-Build DISADVANTAGES • Longer Procurement Process • Eliminates or Reduces Participation in Procurement Process • Inefficient Use of Municipal Funds and Staff Time • Bidding Process • DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

  10. CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW • CMAR • Qualifications-Based Selection • Contractor Engaged Early in Design Phase • Two-Contract Relationship • DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS • CONSTRUCTION PROCESS

  11. CMAR ADVANTAGES • Owner Control of Project Goals • Provides for Value Engineering (VE) and Constructability Reviews • Contractor-Led Estimates • Reduces Overall Risk • Schedule Acceleration • Competitive Selection • DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

  12. CMAR DISADVANTAGES • Engineer’s Estimate for Initial Project Costs • Potential Cost Increase with VE and Constructability Review • Preconstruction Services Cost • Double-Bonding • Separate Contracts • Increased Design Duration • DIFFERING DELIVERY METHODS

  13. TZO WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY • Retrofitting Existing Anthracite Media Filters with new Aqua-Aerobic Systems Diamond Cloth Filter Equipment • New Chlorine Contact Tank • Chemical System Upgrades • Site-Wide Stormwater Improvements • Electrical Improvements

  14. PRECONSTRUCTION AT TZO • Estimates at 90% Document Phase • Development of CPM Schedule • Executed Mentor / Protégé Program with Local MBE, SRS • M/WBE Work Packages

  15. TZO CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS • Challenges & Benefits • Dividing Competitive Work Packages • Flexibility with NCDEQ • Filter Construction Sequencing - Eliminating Option to Bypass Filters • Increasing Minority Participation • Constructability / Cost Review at 90%

  16. TZO SCHEDULE • Work Packages • Constraints of Existing Plant Operations • Minimal Shutdowns / Uninterrupted Access • Effluent Filter Modifications • One Bank of Filters Off-Line Per Time

  17. TOWNSEND WATER TREATMENT PLANT • Lime / PAC Facility • Flocculation & Sedimentation Basins • Filter Upgrades • Backwash Process Upgrades JAN 15 – DEC 15 MAY 16 – DEC 17 PRECONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION

  18. TOWNSEND PRECON METHODOLOGY • Cost Models • 60% Documents • VE • Early Project Schedule Development • Input from O&M Staff, Engineer and Subcontractors • Determines General Conditions Duration • Subcontracting Packages • Facilitate Area Market • Clear Scope Delineation

  19. TOWNSEND CHALLENGES/BENEFITS - GMP • Open Book Environment • Collaborative Preconstruction Workshops • Proactive Project Execution Planning - Plant Production Restrictions • Constructability and Value Analysis • Procurement (Buy-Out) Plan • Start-Up and Commissioning Plan

  20. TOWNSEND CHALLENGES/BENEFITS – M/WBE • Aspirational Goals • Commitment to M/WBE Program • Outreach and Communication with Interested Individuals • Provide Guidance during Bidding, Contracting and Construction Phases • Ensure Parties Follow City’s Guidelines for Implementation

  21. CMAR AT TOWNSEND WTP • Qualifications-Based Selection • Better Control of Construction • Implementation of M/WBE Program • Collaborative and Team-Oriented Project Delivery • Less Adversarial Construction Environment

  22. TOWNSEND – ENGAGING THE CMAR EARLY • 60% Design Documents • Understand Project Budget • Ability to Value Engineer Project • Early Development of CPM

  23. TOWNSEND – CHALLENGES/BENEFITS - MOPO • Maintenance of Plant Operations (MOPO) • Ability to Redesign • Identify Schedule Constraints • Minimize Timeframe for Outages • Ability to Understand Construction Sequencing

  24. TOWNSEND PROJECT SCHEDULE • Early Development of CPM Schedule • Identified Sequencing • Incorporated Peak Times • Sequenced MOPOs

  25. OWNER CHALLENGES - LEGAL • Contract Vehicle • State Standard Contract vs. CMAA vs.AIA • Prequalification Process • State Statute Requirements • Criteria to Prequalify • Target Audience for the Process

  26. OWNER CHALLENGES – M/WBE • Disparity Study • Hispanic Participation - Goal Achievement • Setting of Goals • GMP Estimate or Trade Packages • Bid Responsiveness • Prequalification vs. Bids • HUB Understanding of Formal Bid Process

  27. OWNER CHALLENGES – M/WBE (CONT.) • Mentor – Protégé • City Procedure • Goal Achievement • New Process for Evaluating Good Faith • CM Level and Sub-Tier Level • Mandatory Prequalification • Participation Responsiveness • Education

  28. OWNER CHALLENGES - DESIGN • Design Completion Level • 60% Townsend vs. 90% TZO • Self-Performance • State Statute • Team Cohesiveness • Experience • Receptiveness to Feedback • Design Review Process • Constructability and VE

  29. GMP Finalization / Sub-Contract Execution • Budgeting Value Engineering • Construction Phase • NTP and Duration • NEXT STEPS

  30. M/WBE Understanding • Budgeting / Value Engineering • Prequalification Process • Staff Understanding of CMAR Process • Educate Key Departments / Staff • Develop Procedures to Support Delivery Method • KEY TAKEAWAYS

  31. QUESTIONS?

More Related