120 likes | 280 Views
The Rule of Reciprocation : We should try to repay, in kind, what another person has provided us. Reciprocity. All human societies have this rule (Gouldner, 1960) “an honored network of obligation” (Leakey & Lewin, 1978); “web of indebtedness” (Tiger & Fox, 1971) Enables division of labor
E N D
The Rule of Reciprocation:We should try to repay, in kind, what another person has provided us.
Reciprocity • All human societies have this rule (Gouldner, 1960) • “an honored network of obligation” (Leakey & Lewin, 1978); “web of indebtedness” (Tiger & Fox, 1971) • Enables division of labor • Creates interdependence and societal bonds
Regan (1971) • “Art appreciation” study • Reciprocity condition: confederate leaves and returns with a Coke for the participant • Control condition: confederate leaves and returns • Confederate asks participant to buy raffle tickets
Regan (1971) • Participants given a Coke bought twice as many tickets as those not given anything • For participants in the control condition, the more they liked the confederate, the more tickets they bought • For participants in the reciprocity condition, liking was completely unrelated to ticket purchases
Different outcomes of persuasion • Short-term compliance • Long-term attitude change
Reciprocity in real life • “Free” gifts • “Free” samples • Political donations • Dating
Reciprocity in long-term relationships • Reciprocity operates differently in long-term relationships (families, long-term friendships) • Willingness to provide what the other needs, when it is needed. • Tit-for-tat reciprocity would be awkward and unwanted • It does appear that we keep some accounting
Modern thoughts on reciprocity • Inclusive fitness • “Generational” reciprocity
Reciprocal concessions • Negotiation • Rejection then retreat • The “door-in-the-face” technique (Cialdini et al., 1975)
Cialdini and Ascani (1976) • Students asked to donate blood in a campus blood drive • Door-in-the-face: first asked to donate a pint every six weeks for three years • Control: just asked to donate one pint • Would they agree to donate again?Door-in-the-face: Control:
Benton, Kelley, and Liebling, 1972 • Participants bargained with a “negotiation opponent” for a pool of money • Opponent • Made an extreme demand and stuck with it • Made a moderate demand and stuck with it • Made an extreme demand and retreated to a moderate demand • Third condition led to greater agreement, greater feelings of responsibility for the outcome, and greater satisfaction with the outcome