1 / 22

SF Intermediate Economics

SF Intermediate Economics . Microeconomic Notes Francis O’Toole (Suzanne O’Neill & Frances Ruane ). CONSUMER THEORY. We will look at Scarcity : income and prices Tastes Combine scarcity and tastes (i) Individual demand (ii) Market demand. SCARCITY. 2 Good s: X 1 and X 2

ncervantes
Download Presentation

SF Intermediate Economics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SF Intermediate Economics Microeconomic Notes Francis O’Toole (Suzanne O’Neill & Frances Ruane)

  2. CONSUMER THEORY We will look at • Scarcity: income and prices • Tastes • Combine scarcity and tastes (i) Individual demand (ii) Market demand

  3. SCARCITY 2 Goods: X1 and X2 Fixed money income: M Given prices: p1 and p2 Income constraint: p1X1+p2X2=M Rearranging, X2=M/p2 – (p1/p2)X1 Slope: X2/ X1= - (p1/p2)

  4. Budget Set and Constraint for Two Products x2 Budget constraint is p1x1 + p2x2 = m m /p2 x1 m /p1

  5. Budget Set and Constraint for Two Products x2 Budget constraint is p1x1 + p2x2 = m m /p2 x1 m /p1

  6. Budget Set and Constraint for Two Products x2 m /p2 Just affordable x1 m /p1

  7. Budget Set and Constraint for Two Products x2 m /p2 Not affordable Just affordable x1 m /p1

  8. Budget Set and Constraint for Two Products x2 m /p2 Not affordable Just affordable Affordable (irrational) x1 m /p1

  9. Budget Set and Constraint for Two Products x2 m /p2 the collection of all affordable bundles. Budget Set x1 m /p1

  10. Budget Set and Constraint for Two Products x2 p1x1 + p2x2 = m Re-arranging (as before) x2 = - (p1/p2)x1 + m/p2 so slope is – (p1/p2) m /p2 Budget Set x1 m /p1

  11. SCARITY Budget Constraint M/p2 X2 p1X1+p2X2=M Slope X2/ X1= - (p1/p2) M/p1 Budget Set X1 The slope of the income constraint represents society’s willingness to trade; to increase consumption of product 1 by 1 unit an individual must decrease consumption of product 2 by P1/P2 units. “OPPPORTUNITY COST”

  12. CHANGES IN INCOME CONSTRAINTINCOME CHANGES X2 A parallel shift in the budget constraint Slope remains unchanged X1

  13. INCOME CHANGES • No original choice is lost and new choices are added when income increases, so higher income will make a consumer better off. • Trade off between products [– (p1/p2)] remains unchanged. • An income decrease will make the consumer worse off.

  14. How do the budget set and budget constraint change as p1decreases from p10 to p11? x2 m/p2 P11<P10 Ratio of P1/P2 changes Slope changes Original budget set m/p10 x1 m/p11

  15. How do the budget set and budget constraint change as p1decreases from p10 to p11? x2 m/p2 -p10/p2 Original budget set m/p10 x1 m/p11

  16. How do the budget set and budget constraint change as p1decreases from p10 to p11? x2 m/p2 New affordable choices -p10/p2 Original budget set m/p10 x1 m/p11

  17. How do the budget set and budget constraint change as p1decreases from p10 to p1? x2 m/p2 New affordable choices Budget constraint pivots; slope flattens from -p10/p2 to -p11/p2 -p10/p2 Original budget set -p11/p2 m/p10 x1 m/p11

  18. PRICE CHANGES • Reducing the price of one commodity pivots the constraint outward. No old choice is lost and new choices are added, so reducing one price cannot make the consumer worse off. • Trade off between products [– (p1/p2)] is changed. • Similarly, increasing one price pivots the constraint inwards, reduces choice and cannot make the consumer better off.

  19. PRICE CHANGES II Claim: A doubling of all prices is equivalenttohalving income. P1X1+P2X2=M Let all prices change by a factor of t (e.g. t = 2) (tP1)X1+(tP2)X2=M  P1X1+P2X2=M/t (i.e. equivalent to a parallel shift in the income constraint) (Relatuve prices remain unchanged.)

  20. COMPOSITE PRODUCT n products? P1X1+P2X2+P3X3+P4X4+……..+PnXn=M P1X1+[P2X2+P3X3+P4X4+……..+PnXn]=M [P2X2+P3X3+P4X4+……..+PnXn]representsincome spent on all products other than product 1, that is, income spent on a composite product.

  21. COMPOSITE PRODUCT X2 Composite product X1

  22. INCOME CONSTRAINT and TAXES Excise tax: (P1+t)X1+P2X2=M Value added tax: (1+T)P1X1+P2X2=M Lump Sum tax: P1X1+P2X2=M - (LumpSum) Think about • Income constraint and subsidies • Income constraint and rationing

More Related