600 likes | 778 Views
PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH. in Music Education and Music Therapy. I. Doing Philosophy. II. Philosophy in the Context of MEMT. Two Propositions. ALL research is the doing of philosophy Research seeks to find out “Why”?
E N D
PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH in Music Education and Music Therapy
I. Doing Philosophy II. Philosophy in the Context of MEMT
Two Propositions • ALL research is the doing of philosophy Research seeks to find out “Why”? All research methodologies have their origins in philosophy. II. Philosophic inquiry is a mode of research in its own right.
Like mental lenses they contribute to how we perceive phenomena and thus to what we may see.
…a process of systematic inquiry by which data are gathered, analyzed, and interpreted in ways that contribute to the development of knowledge. ….an unusually stubborn, persistent effort to think straight by intelligently gathering and analyzing data
…often reflects a dialectic between: provisional ideas (hypotheses) exegetic ideas (theories)
…may also be mediated by schemata learned, highly organized, networked conceptual patterns that actively create expectations as they encounter new data
Explanatory Constructs: larger configurations of cognition, such as schemata and theories theories are more passive mental data intentionally manipulated by thought schemata are more actively a part of a researcher’s own cognitive processing procedures, evaluating incoming data, both sensory and mental, for “quality of fit”
Neurobiologist Arthur Damasio (2003) uses a story by G.K. Chesterton to illustrate this point: • A much foretold murder was committed inside a house while four people stood guard and closely watched who was coming and going from the house. That this fully expected murder came to pass was not a puzzle. The puzzle was that the victim was alone and the four observers were adamant: No one had gone in or out of the house. But this was quite false: The postman had gone into the house, done the deed, and left the house in plain view. He had even left unhurried footprints in the snow. Of course, everyone had looked at the postman, and yet all claimed not to have seen him. He simply did not fit the theory they had formulated for the identity of the possible murderer. They were looking but not seeing (pp. 190-191).
We are tempted to assume that we see the world directly and immediately.
But our insight is always mediated by ideas, concepts and explanatory constructs... many of which we take for granted and rarely question.
Most of us would likely respond something like “life on a farm” or “barnyard.” We see the picture and our previously accepted ideas about barns and farms are automatically activated.
By relying solely on those stored frameworks, however, we may jump to a conclusion or cognitive commitment that precludes us from entertaining other thoughts or ideas…. …such as “Why is this electric mixer in the barnyard?”
But it’s sometimes difficult to think about ideas themselves….. ...that is, to think about how we think.
filosofia pursuit of wisdom loving wisdom Doing Philosophy thinking about thinking
Doing Philosophy Philosophy is different from: opinion point of view preference ideology belief advocacy
The motivation of philosophy derives from an uneasiness with the status quo. Doing Philosophy “The opinion of a thousand jackasses is just that: the opinion of a thousand jackasses.”
A basic pre-requisite for doing philosophy: Doing Philosophy An open mind uncluttered in so far as possible by pre-conceived or pre-determined parameters
Basic tools of philosophical research: critical reason/logic Doing Philosophy language
Three basic procedures in philosophic research: Analysis…clarification of thoughts, concepts, and the meaning of language Doing Philosophy Criticism...evaluate basic alternative modes of life and thought and formulate choices Speculation…construct ideal futures or projections of desirable experiences
Basic way of doing philosophy: argument Doing Philosophy “An argument is a connected series of statements intended to establish a definite proposition.” --Monty Python http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y05EmK66Gsk&mode=related&search=
Arguments and Non-Arguments Every scene of this movie was filled with excitement for me. I particularly liked the action scenes on the river. Doing Philosophy expression of support/enthusiasm, not an argument I spent five hundred dollars to take this course and the professor appeared in blue jeans and tee shirt, which I consider bad taste. He may have known what he was talking about, but I couldn’t get past the clothes. a complaint/grip, not an argument The sincerest satisfaction in life comes in doing one’s duty and in being a dependable person. a statement of point of view, not an argument
“He that hath wife and children hath given hostages to fortune; for they are impediments to great enterprise, either of virtue or mischief.” -Francis Bacon Doing Philosophy “Women have great strengths, but they are strengths to help the man. A woman’s primary purpose in life and marriage is to help her husband succeed.” -James Robinson Elaborated, but unsupported statements of opinion, not arguments.
Basic ingredients of an argument: Proposition (statement or assertion that is either true or false) Doing Philosophy A proposition can be either: a premise, or a conclusion. A first step toward understanding arguments is learning to identify premises and conclusions. Unfortunately, they are not always explicit.
GIGO Doing Philosophy In a basic deductive argument if a premise is false, so is everything else “Garbage in…. …Garbage out.”
Validity and Soundness of Arguments An argument is valid if its conclusions follow necessarily from its premises. A sound argument has true premises and true conclusions. All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Socrates is mortal. Doing Philosophy premises are true, inference is valid; this argument is both valid and sound All cats are animals. All pigs are animals. All pigs are cats. premises are true, but improper inference; not a sound argument All movie stars live in Hollywood. Robert Redford is a movie star. Therefore Robert Redford lives in Hollywood. false premise, but valid reasoning a valid argument, but not a sound argument
Primary ways to examine/take issue with deductive arguments: 1. Is there indeed an argument? 2. Does conclusion necessarily follow from premises? Is this the only logical conclusion possible from these premises? 3. Are the premises indeed true?
Inductive Arguments 1. Reason from the particular to the general 2. Evaluated in terms of “inductive force” or probability rather than soundness per se. 3. p <.05 4. Much quantitative research grounded in probability, that is: inductive argument.
Philosophy pervades all research. The purpose of this study is…... Doing Philosophy To that end, the following research questions were designed for this study: Sometimes said that only numbers (quantitative research) delivers objectivity…. Yet, such numbers relate to a premise. Statistics test premises, they do not generate them.
Philosophy is both a body of knowledge (history of ideas) and an ongoing, systematic method of inquiry Doing Philosophy Engagement with both relies essentially upon argument. By means of analyses based on arguments, philosophers can do experiments: thought experiments, where variables are manipulated in imagination rather than in laboratories or in field work.
Scientific method was born from philosophy Positivism Doing Philosophy Post-positivism critiques: feminists deconstructionists
…a process of systematic inquiry by which data are gathered, analyzed, and interpreted in ways that contribute to the development of knowledge. the data for philosophical research are ideas, concepts, and explanatory constructs…philosophers inspect the architecture of such cognitive units, asking “How do we know what we know?” and “Why?” philosophers are all about construct validity.
In MEMT, philosophers may “challenge... the validity of extant ideas and practices. They systematically ask whether these ideas and practices are well grounded. They bypass the peripheral and trivial issues, going to the core of why things are as they seem to be and where they seem to be going. As such, they address central questions relating to music education and challenge its very reason for being…by clarifying terms, exposing and evaluating assumptions, and developing systematic bodies of thought that connect with other ideas in respect to a wide range of issues touching on music education. “ --Estelle Jorgensen Philosophy and MEMT
Please take out your music. Philosophy and MEMT
Music Philosophy and MEMT “For music, despite the saw about its being an international language, is many things to many people, places, and times.” --James R. Oestreich, The New York Times, Sunday, January 22, 2001, p 30 Arts & Leisure (on why the 1980 edition of Grove’s decided not to have an entry on music).
Music Philosophy and MEMT We “could find no one person who could have written on ‘music’ and the changing significance of the term through the ages.” --Stanley Sadie, Editor of TheNew Grove’s Dictionary of Music and Musicians
Education • “…the deliberate, systematic, and sustained effort to transmit or evoke knowledge, attitudes, values, skills and sensibilities” --Lawrence A. Cremin Philosophy and MEMT
Education • Involves configurations of education, e.g. family, church, school, community • Can involve shifting configurations figurations over time, and the impact of one pedagogy upon another • The philosophy of education is not simply a philosophy of institutional schooling Philosophy and MEMT
Education • Relation to: Training, Enculturation, Socialization, Schooling, Therapy Philosophy and MEMT
Education Music Therapy Music GENUS Philosophy and MEMT Species Education through music Education in music Music Education Therapy through music Music as therapy Music Therapy
Music Education Philosophy and MEMT Should music education be part of the School of Education or the School of Fine Arts? History of Ideas: Music as science (quadrivium) Music as art (trivium) Music as fine art (aesthetics)