Data limitations: Does not consider changes in enrolment patterns resulting from skills reform

3. The implications have been assessed by applying these eligibility criteria to reported 2007 VET activity • Ineligible enrolments • Government funded in 2007 but become ineligible for funding under skills reform • Newly eligible enrolments • Fee-for-service enrolments that become eligible for government funding under skills reform

4. Data limitations: • Does not consider changes in enrolment patterns resulting from skills reform • Includes reported fee-for-service activity only

5. i.e. The potential shift of 60,000 enrolments from fee-for-service to govt funding (74%) These are not additional enrolments; they are the potential net funding shift from FFS to GF These enrolments (18%) become ineligible for government funding

6. 84% of domestic fee-for-service SCH eligible for government funding (74% enrolments) 15% of government funded SCH ineligible for government funding (18% enrolments) The net funding shift from FFS to government

7. 68% of the ‘ineligible’ enrolments have access to government funded VET training at a higher level 32% are ineligible for any government funded VET training

8. If just 2 per cent of these Victorians enrolled in VET, this translates into a potential 34,000 additional students entering the VET system

9. Business Services, Community Services & Health and Electro-technology & Communications are the three industries most effected (25,000 ineligible places in total) • AQF 2-4 largest number of ineligible places

10. 44% of gov-funded Public Admin. & Safety enrolments become ineligible

11. All students under 20 have access to a GF VET enrolment • Enrolments by younger students (those aged 20-39) account for the largest number of ineligible enrolments