1 / 26

High Quality Residency Education and Patient Safety are Directly Related

High Quality Residency Education and Patient Safety are Directly Related. David T. Harrington, MD Program Director, General Surgical Residency Program Associate Professor of Surgery. Residency Work Hours. Resident fatigue – clinical errors Residency work hours surrogate for patient safety

nedra
Download Presentation

High Quality Residency Education and Patient Safety are Directly Related

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High Quality Residency Education and Patient Safety are Directly Related David T. Harrington, MD Program Director, General Surgical Residency Program Associate Professor of Surgery

  2. Residency Work Hours • Resident fatigue – clinical errors • Residency work hours surrogate for patient safety • Effects of work hour rules - mixed • Patient Safety • Lack of definitive effect • More cross-coverage and hand-offs • Residency Education • Improved resident well-being, less “burn-out” • Decreased operative experience (FA, TA, continuity) • Increased choice of fellowships • Decreased medical student teaching

  3. KG Volpp et al, Mortality among hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries in the first 2 years….., JAMA 2007

  4. Residency Work Hours • Resident fatigue – clinical errors • Residency work hours surrogate for patient safety • Effects of work hour rules - mixed • Patient Safety • Lack of definitive effect • More cross-coverage and hand-offs • Residency Education • Improved resident well-being, less “burn-out” • Decreased operative experience (FA, TA, continuity) • Increased choice of fellowships • Decreased medical student teaching

  5. Patient Safety and Surgical Quality • Traditional M&M • Process • Joint Commission • SCIP • Centers of Excellence • Trauma - ASC/COT • Bariatric - ASBS • Cancer, Orthopedic, Cardiac • Performance • NSQIP • UHC • CMS – MSDRG and P4P

  6. NSQIP Observed to Expected (O/E) Ratio • Represents the hospital’s outcomes compared to the other ACS NSQIP hospitals, adjusted for inter-hospital differences in patients’ characteristics, comorbidities, and preoperative laboratory values ACS NSQIP Hospital ID Number AS EXPECTED LOW OUTLIER: If the upper bound of the O/E confidence interval is <1.0, the hospital’s outcomes are statistically better than expected. Thus, the hospital’s outcomes are “Exemplary.” HIGH OUTLIER: If the lower bound of the O/E ratio is >1.0, the hospital’s outcomes are statistically worse than expected. Thus, the hospital’s outcomes “Need Improvement.”

  7. Surgical Residency TrainingOutcomes • Process • RRC accreditation • Performance • ABSITE scores • Pass rates on QE & CE • Fellowship placement • Successful practice

  8. Hypothesis Programs which deliver high quality care as measured by: participation in NSQIP verification as a trauma center high rates of compliance in SCIP would have a sound educational programs evidenced by: high pass rates on QE and CE

  9. Methods & Materials • NSQIP participation – NSQIP annual report • Trauma Center verification – www.facs.org/trauma/verified • SCIP compliance for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: SCIP1, 2, 3, VTE1, VTE2 – www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov • QE and CE – https://home.absurgery.org/default.jsp?prog_passreport

  10. Results • NSQIP • 85 (34%) participated • Trauma Center Verification • 82 (32.8%) verified trauma centers • 65 (26%) were Level 1 trauma centers • SCIP • All hospitals had data available • ABS Examinations – 1st time passage rate • QE 83.9 +/- 13.1 • CE 84.5 +/- 11.1 • Combined 80.0 +/- 16.2

  11. NSQIP Participation & QE/CE

  12. Trauma Center Verification & QE/CE

  13. Level 1 Verification & QE/CE

  14. Hypothesis Programs which deliver high quality care as measured by: participation in NSQIP verification as a trauma center high rates of compliance in SCIP would have a sound educational programs evidenced by: high pass rates on QE and CE

  15. Excellent Patient Safety = Excellent Education • RRC site visit • Trauma center verification • Improving SCIP compliance • Improving NSQIP performance • Teaching hospitals are quintessential quality model • New physicians • Ascending levels of responsibility • 6 core competencies • System-based practice • Practice-based learning • Multi-disciplinary • RRC, NSQIP, Trauma Verification, SCIP compliance

  16. Shortcomings • QE/CE pass rates ≠ quality of training • Study has no relevance to medical training • Participation in NSQIP ≠ higher quality of patient care

  17. NSQIP: Changes in Morbidity 2005-2007

  18. Conclusions • Hospitals that participate in NSQIP have a higher quality of surgical resident education than hospitals that do not. • Hospitals that obtain Trauma Center verification have a higher quality of surgical resident education than hospitals that do not. • Hospitals that obtain Level 1 Trauma Center verification have a higher quality of surgical resident education than hospitals that do not.

  19. High Quality Residency Education and Patient Safety are Directly Related David T. Harrington, MD Program Director, General Surgical Residency Program Associate Professor of Surgery

More Related