420 likes | 878 Views
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs. Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs. Fixed costs are not totally uncontrollable. In the long-run, all inputs are variable and fixed costs can also be varied
E N D
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Fixed costs are not totally uncontrollable. • In the long-run, all inputs are variable and fixed costs can also be varied • Firms will also choose their fixed costs in the long run based on the level of output they expect to produce
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Selena’s Gourmet Salsas is considering whether to acquire additional food-preparation equipment • Total cost will be affected two ways: • Firm will have to either rent or boy the additional equipment (will = higher fixed cost in the short run) • If workers have more equipment, they will be more productive and fewer workers will be needed to product any given output so variable cost for any output will be reduced
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs Selena buys the additional food-preparation equipment, doubling its fixed cost to $216 but reducing its VC at any level of output This side shows the firm’s VC , TC, and ATC with the higher level of fixed cost. The ATC for the fixed cost of $216 is given by ATC2 This side shows VC as well as TC and ATC assuming a fixed cost of $108 (from previous examples) The ATC curve for this fixed cost is ATC1
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • When the output is small, ATC is smaller when Selena forgoes the additional equipment and maintains the lower fixed cost of $108: ATC1 is below ATC2
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Why does ATC change like then when fixed cost increases? • When output is low, the increase in fixed cost from the additional equipment outweighs the producing in VC from higher worker productivity • If Selena plans to produce 4 or fewer cases per day, what should she choose?
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Generally, for each output level, there is some choice of fixed cost that minimizes the firm’s ATC for that output level • ATC curves we have seen are defined for a given level of fixed cost – they are defined for the short run and called the “short-run ATC curves”
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • If Selena has been producing 2 cases of salsa per day with a fixed cost of $108 but found herself increasing her output to 8 cases per day for the foreseeable future, then in the long run she should purchase more equipment and increase her fixed cost to a level that minimizes ATC at the 8-cases-per-day output level
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Long-run average total cost curve (LRATC) is the relationship between output and ATC when fixed cost has been chosen to minimize ATC for each level of output • If there are many possible choices of fixed cost, the LRATC will have a smooth U shape
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Distinctions between short-run and long-run: • Long run is when a producer has time to choose the fixed cost appropriate for its desired level of output, that producer will be at some point on the LCATC curve • If the output level is altered, they will no longer be on its LRATC curve and will be instead moving along its current short-run ATC curve • Will return to its LRATC curve when it readjusts its fixed cost for its new output level
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • If she expects to produce only 3 cases for a long time, in the long run she will reduce her fixed cost and move to point A on ATC3 • If she produces 9 cases (putting her at point Y) and expects to continue this for a long time, she will increase her fixed cost in the long run and move to point X If Selena has chosen the level of fixed cost that minimizes short-run average total cost at an output of 6 cases, and actually produces 6 cases, then she will be at point Con LRATC and ATC6 But if she produces only 3 cases, she will move to point B.
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Distinction between short-run and long-run ATC is extremely important • A company that has to increase output suddenly to meet a surge in demand will find that in the short run its ATC rises sharply because it is hard to get extra production out of existing facilities • But in due time, they can build factories or add machinery, short-run ATC falls
Returns to Scale • What determines the shape of the long-run ATC curve? • Scale – the size of the firm’s operations • Firms that experience scale effects in production find that their long-run ATC changes substantionally depending on the quantity of output they produce
Returns to Scale • Increasing Returns to Scale (economies of scale) – is when long-run ATC declines as output increases • Example: Selena’s Gourmet Salsas experiences increasing returns to scale over output level ranging from 0 to 5 cases of salsa per day
Returns to Scale • Decreasing Returns to Scale (diseconomies of scale) is when long-run ATC increases as output increases • Example: Selena experiences decreasing returns to scale at output levels greater than 7 cases
Returns to Scale • Constant Returns to Scale is when long-run ATC is constant as output increases • Example: Selena has constant returns to scale when its produces anywhere from 5 to 7 cases of salsa per day.
Returns to Scale • What explains these scale effects in production? • Increased specialization – increasing returns due to larger output level • Very large initial setup cost (auto manufacturing) – increasing returns due to a high fixed cost in the form of factories and equipment necessary to produce any output • Decreasing returns are found in large firms when experience problems of coordination and communications
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Fixed costs are not totally uncontrollable. • In the long-run, • Firms will also choose their fixed costs in the long run based on the level of output they expect to produce
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Selena’s Gourmet Salsas is considering whether to acquire additional food-preparation equipment • Total cost will be affected two ways: • Firm will have to either rent or boy the additional equipment • If workers have more equipment, they will be more productive and fewer workers will be needed to product any given output so variable cost for any output will be reduced
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • When the output is small, ATC is smaller when Selena forgoes the additional equipment and maintains the lower fixed cost of $108: ATC1 is below ATC2
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Why does ATC change like then when fixed cost increases? • If Selena plans to produce 4 or fewer cases per day, what should she choose?
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Generally, for each output level, there is some choice of fixed cost that minimizes the firm’s ATC for that output level • ATC curves we have seen are defined for a given level of fixed cost –
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Long-run average total cost curve (LRATC) is the relationship between output and ATC when fixed cost has been chosen to minimize ATC for each level of output
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Distinctions between short-run and long-run: • Long run is when a producer has time to choose the fixed cost appropriate for its desired level of output, that producer will be at some point on the LCATC curve • If the output level is altered, they will no longer be on its LRATC curve and will be instead moving along its current short-run ATC curve • Will return to its LRATC curve when it readjusts its fixed cost for its new output level
Short-Run versus Long-Run Costs • Distinction between short-run and long-run ATC is extremely important • A company that has to increase output suddenly to meet a surge in demand will find that in the short run its ATC rises sharply because it is hard to get extra production out of existing facilities • But in due time, they can build factories or add machinery, short-run ATC falls
Returns to Scale • What determines the shape of the long-run ATC curve? • Firms that experience scale effects in production find that their long-run ATC changes substantionally depending on the quantity of output they produce
Returns to Scale • Increasing Returns to Scale (economies of scale) – • Example: Selena’s Gourmet Salsas experiences increasing returns to scale over output level ranging from 0 to 5 cases of salsa per day
Returns to Scale • Decreasing Returns to Scale (diseconomies of scale) • Example: Selena experiences decreasing returns to scale at output levels greater than 7 cases
Returns to Scale • Constant Returns to Scale is when long-run ATC is constant as output increases • Example: Selena has constant returns to scale when its produces anywhere from 5 to 7 cases of salsa per day.
Returns to Scale • What explains these scale effects in production? • _________________________– increasing returns due to larger output level • Very large initial setup cost (auto manufacturing) – increasing returns due to a high fixed cost in the form of factories and equipment necessary to produce any output • Decreasing returns are found in large firms when experience problems of coordination and communications