1 / 21

Henk Bos (Aarhus, Utrecht) Luminy, 17/04/07

Arithmetic , Geometry , Algebra and Analysis as historiographical categories for early modern mathematics. Henk Bos (Aarhus, Utrecht) Luminy, 17/04/07. Historiographical Categories. Why? Redefining Geometrical Exactness 1590 – 1650: “Merging of geometry and algebra”

neila
Download Presentation

Henk Bos (Aarhus, Utrecht) Luminy, 17/04/07

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Arithmetic, Geometry, Algebraand Analysisas historiographical categoriesfor early modern mathematics Henk Bos (Aarhus, Utrecht) Luminy, 17/04/07

  2. Historiographical Categories Why? • Redefining Geometrical Exactness • 1590 – 1650: “Merging of geometry and algebra” • Why did it take so long? • To understand the obstacles against the merging • A methodological exercise

  3. Terminology Objects • Number(s)Rational! • Geometrical Magnitude(s)Line segments, not numbers! (no unit) • Abstract Magnitude(s)Algebra Speciosa (Viète, van Roomen) • Ratio(s)Not fractions!

  4. Terminology Operations • Arithmetical operations (on numbers) • Algebraic operations (on objects for which they are explicitly defined) • Geometrical constructions (on geometrical magnitudes) • Symbolic operations (on abstract magnitudes) • Ratio operations (on ratios)

  5. Terminology Modes of objects within arguments: • Given: supposed to be available in such a way that operations and comparisons can be performed on them;The modern term would be indeterminate. • Unknown: required to be determined by construction or (numerical or algebraic) computation.

  6. Category: Arithmetic The mathematical theory and practices that deal with numbers.

  7. Category: Geometry The mathematical theory and practices that deal with geometrical magnitudes.

  8. Category: Algebra Mathematical theories and practices that • Deal either with numbers or with (geometrical or abstract) magnitudes • Involve unknowns and/or indeterminates • Employ the algebraic operations • Involve equations

  9. Category: Analysis Mathematical methods • For finding the solutions (in geometry: the constructions) of problems • Or (but rarely) for finding proofs of theorems • Doing so by introducing unknowns. • In geometry:- If algebra is used: “Analysis nova”- If not: “Analysis veterum”, based on Euclid’s Data

  10. Categorization Comments • Result: Understanding the obstacles against merging algebra and geometry • The case of Analysis • Mathematics as activity

  11. Merging algebra and geometry Obstacles: • Irrational numbers • Multiplication, dimension and the unit • Numerical and geometrical exactness • Numerical and geometrical indeterminates (new!)

  12. Merging algebra and geometry Obstacles: • Irrational numbersAbout objects • Multiplication, dimension and the unitAbout operations • Numerical and geometrical exactnessAbout operations • Numerical and geometrical indeterminates About modes

  13. Merging algebra and geometry Merging objects: • Numbers are not Magnitudes Merging Operations: • No merging, Algebraic operations took over and wiped out the geometrical ones • Algebraic exactness difficult to define Dealing with Modes • Problematic in numerical algebra but natural in geometry

  14. Merging algebra and geometry Obstacle 3: Numerical and geometrical exactness • Arithmetical operations: exact • Algebraic operations:- In Arithmetic: not exact (approximations)- In Geometry: Quadratic operations exact, others may be • Geometrical operations: Exact if acceptable • Symbolic operations: Exactness undefined • Ratio operations: PM

  15. Merging algebra and geometry Obstacle 4: Numerical and geometrical unknowns and indeterminates The case of Analysis

  16. Mathematics as activity Modes: unknowns, indeterminates • They refer to the activity of the mathematician, not to the mathematical object • Inconsistent with a naïve Platonic view of mathematics • Yet essential for Algebra and Analysis • I.e. for a major part of mathematics

  17. Speculation 18th – 20th centuries: • The concept of “given” has lost its function“Unknowns” have become rootsEquations have become objectsProblems have become theorems • Analysis has been reduced to Platonic object status • The activity is no longer reflected inm the concepts

  18. Discussion

  19. RESERVE

  20. The case of Analysis • The classical geometrical analysis argument Given Required (unknown) • Suppose it done (counterfactual!) • Mark the givens and the unknowns esp. the required unknowns • Argue – with Euclid’s Data: • “If Objects A, B, C are given than Objects P, Q, R are given too • Argue such that modes of unknowns change to given Until the modes of the required unknowns have changed to given

  21. The case of Analysis • they are strange • these modes change during the argument • Example: the classical analysis argument • Given • Required (unknown) • Suppose it done (counterfactual!) • Mark the givens and the unknowns esp. the required unknowns • Argue – with Euclid’s Data: • “If Objects A, B, C are given than Objects P, Q, R are given too • Argue such that modes of unknowns change to given Until the modes of the required unknowns have changed to given

More Related