1 / 22

Visualization of vortex states in mesoscopic superconductors

Visualization of vortex states in mesoscopic superconductors. I. Grigorieva, L. Vinnikov, A. Geim (Manchester) V. Oboznov, S. Dubonos (Chernogolovka). Motivation.

neila
Download Presentation

Visualization of vortex states in mesoscopic superconductors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Visualization of vortex states in mesoscopic superconductors I. Grigorieva, L. Vinnikov, A. Geim (Manchester) V. Oboznov, S. Dubonos (Chernogolovka)

  2. Motivation • Vortices in small superconductors (size R ~ξ,λ) expected to behave similar to electrons in artificial atoms, i.e. obey specific rules for shell filling, exhibit magic numbers, etc. • In confined geometries, superconducting wave function must obey boundary conditions which determine total vorticityL • Vortex states are further influenced by vortex interactions with screening currents (for R > λ) • Numerical studies of vortex states exist but so far no direct observations • We present direct observations of vortex states in small superconducting dots by magnetic decoration

  3. Starting Nb films: λ(0) 90 nm; ξ(0)  15 nm; Hc2(0)  1.5 T;   6; Tc=9.1 K; thickness d = 150 nm > ξ, λ Vortex structure in a macroscopic Nb film. External field Hext = 80 Oe

  4. Each structure contained circular disks, squares and triangles of four different sizes:  1µm;  2 µm;  3µm; 5 µm • Over 500 dots decorated in each experiment (same field, temperature, decoration conditions) 200 µm 20 µm 5 µm

  5. experimental details • field-cooling in perpendicular magnetic field • external magnetic field varying between 20 and 160 Oe, i.e., H/Hc2 = 0.002 – 0.016, where Hc2(3.5 K)  1 T; H • decoration captures snapshots of vortex states at T  3.5 K =0.4Tc; • thickness of all nanostructured samples d = 150 nm > ξ, λ

  6. despite strong pinning, confinement has dominating effect on vortex states: • well defined shell structures observed for L 35 in circular disks; • a variety of states with triangular / square symmetries observed for L  15 for triangular and square dots L = 25 (3,8,14) • due to many different combinations of Hext values and dot sizes, almost all possible vorticities between L=0 and L 50 were observed (L = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,…) • for larger L (L>30-35), vortex arrangements are less well defined and for L > 50 become disordered, similar to macroscopic films L = 9 L = 94

  7. Vorticity vs field • for all values of vorticity L, external filed (total flux) required for nucleation of L vorticies significantly exceeds corresponding field for a macroscopic film

  8. Vorticity vs field experiment, disk size R 100ξ • nucleation of the first vortex requires magnetic flux corresponding to over 30 • states with small vorticities are stable over appreciable field intervals, e.g. for a 2µm disk, H 20 Oe for transition to L=1; H 10 Oe for transition to L=2 B.J. Baelus and F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B 65, 104515, 2002 numerical study, R = 6ξ

  9. Multiplicity of vortex arrangements • at least two or three different states observed in every experiment in dots of nominally the same size 2 m dots, Hext= 80 Oe (3,3,3) (2,7) (2,8) (3,7) (1,8) 3 m dots, Hext= 60 Oe • variations in dot sizes, shape irregularities lead to variations in flux up to 0 • small differences in energy of different states with same L implied (1,8) (3,7) (2,8) (3,3,3) (2,7)

  10. Multiplicity of vortex arrangements  0.50

  11. Evolution of vortex states (3,8) (3,7) (2,7) (2,8) (1,8) (1,7) (6) (1,6) (1,5) (5) (4) (3) (2) (1) (0)

  12. Comparison with theory • observed vortex states in good • agreement with numerical • simulations B.J. Baelus, L.R.E. Cabral, F.M. Peeters, Phys.Rev.B 69, 064506 (2004)

  13. Magic numbers • we are able to • identify magic numbers (maximum numbers of vortices in each shell before the next shell nucleates) • identify shell filling rules L = 5 L = 6 … L = 8 L = 7

  14. Magic numbers …after that new vortices appear in either the first or second shell: L=9 (2,7) L=10 (3,7) L=11 (3,8) L=10 (2,8) … and this continues until the total vorticity reaches L=14 (L1=4; L2=10)

  15. Magic numbers … third shell appears at L>14 in the form of one vortex in the centre … L=17 (1,5,11) L=18 (1,6,11) … after that additional vortices nucleate in either first, second or third shell until L3 reaches 16… L=24 (3,7,14) L=22 (2,7,13)

  16. Magic numbers … fourth shell appears at L3>18 in the form of one vortex in the centre, and so on … L=35 (1,5,11,18) • rules of shell filling similar to electrons in artificial atoms (V.M. Bedanov and F.M. Peeters, Phys. Rev.B 49,667, 1994) • magic numbers: one shell  L1=6 two shells  L2=10 three shells  L3=18 …..

  17. Vortex states in triangular dots

  18. Vortex states in square dots

  19. Conclusions • direct observations of multiple vortex states in confined geometry • low-vorticity states (L<4) are stable over surprisingly large intervals of magnetic field • well defined shell structures in circular geometry • magic numbers for vortex shell filling

  20. vortex configurations do not change with increasing external field L=20 (1,6,13) Hext=160 Oe L=21 (1,7,13) Hext=160 Oe L=18 (1,6,11) Hext = 30 Oe

More Related