1 / 16

Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses

Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses. How to Predict the postprandial glycemic responses/PPGR. Background. P ostprandial hyperglycemia contributes to elevated A1C levels, with its relative contribution being greater at A1C levels that are closer to 7%[1].

neilj
Download Presentation

Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses How to Predict the postprandial glycemic responses/PPGR

  2. Background • Postprandial hyperglycemia contributes to elevated A1C levels, with its relative contribution being greater at A1C levels that are closer to 7%[1]. • A1c is the primary predictor of diabetes-associated complications[1]. • Factors that may affect PPGR: Genetics, lifestyle, insulin sensitivity, exocrine pancreatic and glucose transporters activity levels (GLUT4), and gut microbiota[1]. • Two sequenced cohort studies (main cohort, validation cohort) and one RCT with 26 individuals are available[2]. References: 1.American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes----2015. Diabetes Care 2015;38 (Suppl. 1):S37 2.David Z., Tal K., Niv Z. et al. Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell 2015;163 (5):1079-94

  3. Questions to answer • What clinical and microbiome factors could positively or negatively affect the PPGRs? • Whether clinical and microbiome factors could be integrated into an algorithm that predicts individualized PPGRs? • Whether personally tailored dietary interventions based on the algorithm could improve PPGRs?

  4. Structure and summary • Part 1 – A cohort with 800 participants • Cohort profile (800): Age, Sex, BMI, A1c, TC, HDL-C, Waist-to-hip, etc. • Data input: CGM (blinded), food intake, lifestyle, exercise, sleep, microbitota, etc. • Duration: 1 week • Part 2 – A cohort with 100 participants • Cohort profile (100): Age, Sex, BMI, A1c, TC, HDL, Waist-to-hip, etc. • Data input: CGM (blinded), food intake, lifestyle, exercise, sleep, microbiota, etc. • Duration: 1 week • Part 3 – A two-arm blinded RCT with 26 participants • Data input: CGM, food intake, lifestyle, exercise, sleep, microbitota, etc. • Experiment vs. control • Duration: 1 week “profile” week + 2 weeks trial phase Abbreviations: CGM: Continuous glucose monitor RCT: Randomized Controlled trial BMI: Body mass index TC: Total cholesterol HDL-C: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

  5. Part 1 A cohort with 800 participants

  6. Part 1 A cohort with 800 participants • Baseline data • Food frequency • Lifestyle • Medical background questionnaires • Anthropometric measures • A panel of blood tests • A single stool sample • Glucose levels (including PPGR) – CGM • Subsequently data (Logging into a website) • Food intake (type, weight) • Exercise • Sleep Abbreviations: PPGR: Postprandial glycemic responses

  7. Part 1 A cohort with 800 participants • Intrapersonal variability (standard meals) • Not significant • Interpersonal variability (standard meals) • Significant • Found in participants having high PPGRs • Found in participants having normal PPGRs

  8. Part 1 A cohort with 800 participants

  9. Part 1 A cohort with 800 participants • Interpersonal variability (real-life meals) • Only examined meals that contained 20-40 g of carbohydrates and had a single dominant food component whose carbohydrate content exceeded 50% of the meal’s carbohydrate content

  10. Part 1 A cohort with 800 participants

  11. Part 1 A cohort with 800 participants • Risk factors positively associated with PPGR • Well established: BMI, A1c, wakeup glucose, systolic BP, age • Meal content (relative), sleep times • ALT, CRP • Hips circumference • Gut microbiota/16S rRNA: Actinobacteria, Coriobacteriia, Coriobacteriales • Gut microbiota/Metagenomics: Gammaproteobacteria, etc. • Gut microbiota/KEGG pathways: ko02020, ko02030, ko02040, etc. • Gut microbiota/KEGG modules: M00226, M00226, etc. • Beneificial factors negatively associated with PPGR • Meal content (relative), exercise • Non-fasting HDL • Gut microbiota/16S rRNA: Tenericutes • Gut microbiota/KEGG pathways: ko02010, ko00240, ko00300, etc. • Gut microbiota/KEGG modules: M00233 Metagenomics: is the study of genetic material recovered directly from environmental samples 16S rRNA: A component of the 30S small subunit of prokaryotic ribosomes ALT: Alanine aminotransferase CRP: C-reactive protein KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes is a collection of databases dealing with genomes, biological pathways, diseases, drugs, and chemical substances.

  12. Part 2 A cohort with 100 participants

  13. Part 2 A cohort with 100 participants

  14. Part 2 A cohort with 100 participants • PDP – Factors positively associated with PPGR • Amount of carbohydrate (however, interpersonal variability) • Meal sodium, meal water • Time from last sleep • Fibers (short-term) • Gut microbitoa • PDF – Factors negatively associated with PPGR • Meal’s ratio of fat to carbohydrates or total fat content (however, interpersonal variability) • Fibers (long-term) • Short effect • Gut microbiota PDP: Partial dependence plots

  15. Part 3 A RCT with 26 participants • All participants with one week input • Data: microbiome, blood parameters, CGM, etc. • Standard breakfast • Other meals are complied by a dietitian • Control group • Blindly assigned to each arms • One week of “good diet” and another week of “bad diet” compiled by the dietitian • Experimental group • One week “good diet” or “bad diet” (sequence was randomly determined) • Another week the residual type of diet Good diet: A diet composed of the meals predicted by the algorithm or experts to have low PPGRs Bad diet: A diet composed of the meals predicted by the algorithm or experts to have high PPGRs

  16. Part 3 A RCT with 26 participants

More Related