1 / 21

Evidence for B s in  (5S) at CLEO and  (4S) Studies at BaBar

Evidence for B s in  (5S) at CLEO and  (4S) Studies at BaBar. Jianchun Wang Syracuse University ICHEP’04 August 16-22, 2004, Beijing.  (5S) Study at CLEO. CLEO studies B s in both inclusive and exclusive modes. Data was taken with the CLEO III detector. CLEO PRL 54, 381 (1985).

neith
Download Presentation

Evidence for B s in  (5S) at CLEO and  (4S) Studies at BaBar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evidence for Bs in (5S) at CLEO and (4S) Studies at BaBar Jianchun Wang Syracuse University ICHEP’04 August 16-22, 2004, Beijing

  2. (5S) Study at CLEO • CLEO studies Bs in both inclusive and exclusive modes. • Data was taken with the CLEO III detector. Jianchun Wang

  3. CLEO PRL 54, 381 (1985) (5S) A Brief Introduction of (5S) • CLEO & CUSB observed (5S) in 1985. M = 10.8650.008 GeV G = 11013 MeV s((5S))~0.35 nb, ~1/10s(cont). • The composition of the (5S) needs to be investigated. In PDG only e+e- mode is quoted. • Dominant hadronic decay modes: (M(5S)-2MB=307MeV): BB, BB*, B*B*, BBπ, BB*π, B*B*π, BBππ (& c.c.). (M(5S)-2MBs=126MeV): BsBs, BsBs*, Bs*Bs*. • CUSB studied Doppler effect of photon in B(s)*B(s)*g. • CLEO studied: the shape of the lepton spectrum, inclusive particle yield and exclusive Bs reconstruction. • With 116 pb-1 data there is no strong conclusion on Bs production. Jianchun Wang

  4. R DR DR Energy (GeV) Model Predictions • The hadronic cross section in the Upsilon region is well described by the Unitarized Quark Model (UQM), which is a coupled channel model (ref: S. Ono et al, PRL55, 2938(1985)). • The UQM predicts that the Bs(*)Bs(*) production ~ 1/3 of the total (5S) cross section. And (5S) decays are dominated by B*B* and Bs*Bs*. • Other models predict a smaller (5S)Bs*Bs* component. Jianchun Wang

  5. (5S) data B(s) Ds+ X, Ds+ fp+,fK+K- Dfp Dsfp (4S) data Dfp Dsfp M(K+K-p+) (GeV) The Inclusive Channel • Expect much more Ds in (5S) decays than in (4S) decays: • B (BDsX) ~ (10.52.6)% • B (BsDsX) ~ 100% • The (5S), (4S), and continuum data are analyzed to estimate contributions from different sources. In (5S) and (4S) samples ~20% of reconstructed Ds come from continuum. • Ds yield is measured in different x=|p|/Ebeam intervals. • Reconstruction efficiency ~30%. Jianchun Wang

  6. (4S) (5S) NDs/N(4S)(104) NDs/N(5S)(104) |P| / Ebeam |P| / Ebeam Ds Production in (4S) & (5S) Decays Continuum subtraction and efficiency correction, no B correction in plots Preliminary B((4S)DsX) = (22.30.75.7)% B(BDsX) = (11.10.42.9)% PDG (10.52.6)% B((5S)DsX) = (55.05.217.8)% B((5S)DsX)/B((4S)DsX)=2.50.30.6 The systematic error is dominated by B (Dsfp+) and number of (5S) events. Jianchun Wang

  7. NDs/N(5S)-(NDs/N(4S)((104) |P| / Ebeam Evidence of Bs in (5S) Decays Bs decay modes are analogous to the corresponding B decay modes. A model estimate gives (ref: ICHEP04  ABS11-0778 ) B (BsDsX) = (9211)%. Knowing Ds production rate in (5S), B, and Bs decays  B ((5S)Bs(*)Bs(*))= (2139)% consistent with phenomenological predictions. Significant excess of Ds at (5S)  Evidence of Bs production at (5S) Preliminary Jianchun Wang

  8. Ebeam – Ecandidate (GeV) Mbc (Bs candidate) (GeV) Mbc (Bs candidate) (GeV) Exclusive Bs Reconstruction • The B reconstruction techniques used at (4S) are employed to reconstruct Bs from (5S): • Three sources of Bs produce three distinct distributions. B (Bs*Bsg) ~100% MC Jianchun Wang

  9. BsJ/ f//, J/+-, e+e- f  K+K-,   p+p-, gg BsDs(*) p-/r-, Ds*Dsg DsK+K0,K+K*0,fp+, fr+ Ebeam – Ecandidate (GeV) Ebeam – Ecandidate (GeV) Mbc (Bs candidate) (GeV) Mbc (Bs candidate) (GeV) Exclusive Bs Signals At (5S) Preliminary Nsignal = 4, Nbkg  0.1 Nsignal = 8, Nbkg  1 (5S) decay to Bs(*)Bs(*) is dominated by Bs*Bs* mode. Jianchun Wang

  10. (4S) Studies at BaBar EMC DIRC e+ (3.1GeV) DCh e-(9 GeV) SVT • Three (4S) scans and one (3S) scan are used in the measurement of the (4S) resonance parameters. • 81.7 fb-1(4S) data are used in the measurement of B((4S)B0B0). Jianchun Wang

  11. Measurement of (4S) Parameters • The current mass and width of (4S) are with large uncertainty. It can be improved. • The (4S) resonance parameters can be determined by measuring the energy dependence of the cross section sbb and fitting to a line-shape function. • Relativistic Breit-Wigner function. • Radiation correction. • Beam energy spread correction. • The (3S) scan is used to measure energy spread and calibrate energy. • Large sample of data around (4S) peak is used to determine the peak cross-section. Jianchun Wang

  12. BaBar ARGUS CUSB CLEO The (4S) Parameters (For details of BaBar measurement see: B. Aubert, et al., hep-ex/0405025) Jianchun Wang

  13. p+ D B0 D*+ Measurement of B ((4S)B0B0) • Status of R+/0 f+-/f00  B ((4S)B+B-) / B ((4S)B0B0): • Theoretical predications range from 1.03 to 1.25. • Current PDG value (1.0290.0540.045) consistent with unity. • Precise measurement will re-normalize many B decay branching fractions, and contribute to our understanding of isospin violation. • BaBar uses single and double tag events to measure f00. • Only slow p+ (60MeV < P < 200MeV) and (1.5GeV < P < 2.5 GeV) detected. = 1 Jianchun Wang

  14. sideband signal M22 (GeV2) Ms2 (GeV2) Event Samples • PDF of Signal, combinatorial and peaking BB bkg are determined from MC simulation. The continuum bkg are subtracted using continuum data. • Double tag sample contains extra bkg from combinatorial and peaking BB in selecting the first one. These are subtracted using sideband. Jianchun Wang

  15. The Measurement of f00 f00 = 0.486  0.010  0.009 The measurement is independent on B (decay chain), reconstruction efficiency, tB+/tB0, or assumption of isospin symmetry. (ref: B. Aubert, et al., hep-ex/0408022) Jianchun Wang

  16. Summary • CLEO studied Bs in both inclusive and exclusive modes. They found evidence for Bs(*)Bs(*) production at the (5S), dominated by Bs*Bs* mode. • B ((4S)DsX) = (22.30.75.7)% • B (BDsX) = (11.10.42.9)% • B ((5S)DsX) = (55.05.217.8)% • B ((5S)DsX)/B ((4S)DsX) = 2.50.30.6 • B ((5S)Bs(*)Bs(*)) = (2139)%, model dependent • The BaBar had measured (4S) parameters: • M = (10579.30.41.2) MeV, • Gtot = (20.71.62.5) MeV, • Gee = (0.3210.0170.029) keV. • The BaBar measured B ((4S)B0B0)=0.4860.0100.009. Preliminary Jianchun Wang

  17. Backup Slides Jianchun Wang

  18. (5S) (4S) |PDs| / Ebeam |PDs| / Ebeam MC Expectation & Feynman Diagram B Bs Jianchun Wang

  19. Ebeam – Ecandidate (GeV) Mbc (Bs candidate) (GeV) Bs Exclusive Modes Bs decays estimated from B decays. Events 2 4 1 1 Ds(*) decays Jianchun Wang

  20. (4S) Parameter Systematic Errors Jianchun Wang

  21. Systematic Error for f00 f00 = 0.486  0.010  0.009 Jianchun Wang

More Related