1 / 8

仙台 GDE

仙台 GDE. 横谷、山本（明） 2008.2.4 ＧＤＥ活動報告会. 参加者. 予想では～ 40 人くらいか（通常～ 100 人） 米英から出席が確実な人は (1/31 EC で配られた文書で OK のついている人、括弧内はその後の情報） Barish, Harrison, Foster, Ross, Kuchler, Seryi, Paterson, Adolphsen, Markiewicz, Phinney, Himmel, Mark Palmer, Raubenheimer, (Garbincius, Tom Peterson, Don Mitchell).

neith
Download Presentation

仙台 GDE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 仙台GDE 横谷、山本（明） 2008.2.4 ＧＤＥ活動報告会

  2. 参加者 • 予想では～40人くらいか（通常～100人） • 米英から出席が確実な人は(1/31 ECで配られた文書でOKのついている人、括弧内はその後の情報）Barish, Harrison, Foster, Ross, Kuchler, Seryi, Paterson, Adolphsen, Markiewicz, Phinney, Himmel, Mark Palmer, Raubenheimer,(Garbincius, Tom Peterson, Don Mitchell)

  3. GDE Program • 3日（月） • am: ACFA+GDE Plenary • pm: GDE Plenary • Reception • 4日（火） Parallel • 5日（水） Parallel • 6日（木） Plenary • am: GDE Plenary • pm (14:00-15:45) : ACFA+GDE Plenary

  4. Tohoku Univ. GDE Meeting（以下はMarc Rossのスライド、1/31） • Important strategic meeting given forced re-planning • Expect reduced GDE participation due to US and UK budget issues • ~40 as opposed to ~100 in the past • Turn to our advantage by having fewer but well-focused Working Groups (WG) with clearly defined goals • Expect (drive) a more ‘working environment’ than simply presentations of status. • achieve some real work • Will require more PM-driven up-front preparation.

  5. What Required • Re-planning for EDR • Including US and UK difficulties • Re-form the plan • TDP1 by 2010 : Technology feasibility (as AY’s word) • TDP2 by 2012 : Technology credibility • Work-package • Organization to be settled • Subjects to be discussed • SCRF technology • Dumping Ring • MDI/BDS • Cost reduction

  6. 4 Working Groups • WG-1 Cost Reduction Studies • Core team (~10) to review and evaluate RDR design • Re-visit Caltech cost reduction lists • Brainstorming • WG-2 SRF • On-going SRF planning (Akira to plan) • WG-3 BDS / MDI • ATF-2 and general MDI issues • joint sessions with detector people • WG-4 DR • Planning e-cloud mitigation experimental programme • CESR-TA planning • ATF

  7. Work Plan / Nest Step • Publicise Working Groups and general scope to GDE (MCR) • Increased attendance? • Work on specific charges / Agendas • WG-1 Cost reduction • NJW/MCR/JC • (Tom Himel and Ewan Paterson?) • WG-2 SRF • Akira • WG-3 MDI/BDS • Andrei Seryi (+NW and MCR) • (include MDI detector person(s)) • WG-4 DR • Mark Palmer, MCR, Urakawa (or B-factory contact?) • Workshop planning (JC and Max) • Plenary sessions (proposal for talks?) • Parallel session logistics GDE only. Include KEK person for general planning(Yokoya? Toge? Urakawa?, tbd??)

  8. Project Management Issues • Publication of TD (phase I & II) R&D plan • Finalised update from present document • WP and global resource consolidation • (Mostly work between now and Sendai) • EDMS and related • Implementing ILC-EDMS • RDR documentation (desing consolidation) • Establishing the baseline • (Re-)establishing VALUE traceability • VALUE estimate • Tools for maintaining VALUE estimate • Plans for implementation • (links up with previous bullet point)

More Related