150 likes | 224 Views
ST Analysis: Introduction M. Needham EPFL. Outline. Aims of the meeting Releasing code Performance Monitoring Results (IT and TT): Active fraction, noise rates Problems Header thresholds. Aims. To get an overview of how well the detector is working
E N D
ST Analysis: Introduction M. Needham EPFL
Outline • Aims of the meeting • Releasing code • Performance Monitoring • Results (IT and TT): • Active fraction, noise rates • Problems • Header thresholds
Aims • To get an overview of how well the detector is working • Communicate information/known problems • Focus on ‘analysis’ part • Discuss/understand plots • This meeting is dedicated to setting thresholds/Tell1 issues • What we are doing now • Future meetings driven by needs as we get data, e.g: • Alignment • Understanding the signal (S/N, cluster shapes)
Releasing Code • Following is the official release procedure • All code should be tested and run before release • Test for fpe exceptions • Document the code with doxygen/javaDoc comments • Update the release notes • Provide python support: • Update dictionaries • Test can instantiate and use all code in a python script • Tag the code and add to tag collector • https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LHCb/CVSUsageGuidelines • Send email to lhcb-st-soft (and maybe also lhcb-project-trackingsoft)
Releasing Code • If you don’t follow the official procedure • Expect to be named and shamed on lhcb-soft-talk • The python support: Catch-22 • We are not obliged to provide tested python bindings for all code • But python people expect to be able to call all C++ code from python • Only way to avoid emails to lhcb-soft-talk • Provide python bindings/dicts for all code • Test that they actually work [using the class in python is the only way] "That's some catch, that catch-22," he observed. "It's the best there is," Doc Daneeka agreed.
Releasing Code • It’s a pain and Python has many problems: • syntax changes very often [e.g. see material scan script] • Many bindings are missing • Debugging problems is difficult for non-super gurus • see many emails on lhcb-soft-talk • Remark : • jobOptions moved to python: we all have to use python now
Monitoring Performance • Perform basic checks on all data we take: • Run ZS, NZS, error decoding (already give lots of info) • Basic performance checks: STClusterMonitor, STPerformanceMonitor • See next slides • Keep track of all problems we have • For now just a web page for each run I look at • http://lphe.epfl.ch/~mneedham/problems/index.php • Future ? Savannah, something else ?
Monitoring Performance • STPerformanceMonitor: • Simple representation of where we are • Simple C++ algorithm • For now two numbers (one versus time): • Fraction of the detector that is active (ie could give a cluster) • fraction of the detector where I found a bank that I could decode • + fraction not flagged as dead in the DetectorElement • Occupancy [= noise rate for now] • Possible extension: plot showing this ‘per detector element’
Results: IT New firmware errors properly handled IT3C not configuring Vfs 400 Vfs 1000 Vfs 400, Lower threshold (S/N ~ 4.5 ) Firmware bug
Results: IT Problems • Loss of sync in source id 76, pp 2, beetle 2 in some runs • Sometimes don’t have IT3C as it doesn’t configure • Source ID 41 pseudo-header error at low rate • Solve by tuning discrimination thresholds • Invalid + duplicate clusters: seems solved ? • At least in ~100 k events
Results: IT Simple C++ algorithm Forbidden region 112 - 144 (guess) Masked channels Forbidden region 112 - 137 (guess)
Results: TT New firmware errors properly handled Bad ports/ Beetles masked Many PCN errors ? The HV off New firmware bug
Results: TT Problems • Source id 106, sync RAM full : pp3 beetle 5 • Source id 32 tlklinkloss pp2 , beetle 5 • Source id 42 pp2 beetle 4 tlklinkloss • Source ids 2,3 68 some beetles out of sync • Invalid + duplicate clusters: solved or not ? Some may be fixed by digitizer board replacement this week 96.5 % 92.9 % Lost boards 3,32,42 are the problem boards Run 28790
Results: TT Masked Channels Bad Beetles Source IDs 32, 42, 106 Tune to 112 and 137 cf IT A little low ? (IT has some ports this low) Alittle high (IT has some ports this high)
Summary • STPerformanceMonitor useful problem detecting tool • Tests described here could be run by ST shift crew ? • Many problems solved, many new problems occuring • History of performance versus time • Pseudo-header thresholds tuned • Lots of useful information in beetle headers • e.g. Masked and problem channel