1 / 7

Gap Analysis for Operating IPv6-only MPLS Networks draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-01

Gap Analysis for Operating IPv6-only MPLS Networks draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-01. Wes George (operator asking for it) Carlos Pignataro, Rajiv Asati Kamran Raza , Ronald Bonica Rajiv Papneja , Dhruv Dhody Vishwas Manral. IETF 87 - Berlin, Germany. v1. Motivation.

nellis
Download Presentation

Gap Analysis for Operating IPv6-only MPLS Networks draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-01

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gap Analysis for Operating IPv6-only MPLS Networksdraft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-01 Wes George (operator asking for it) Carlos Pignataro, Rajiv Asati Kamran Raza, Ronald Bonica Rajiv Papneja, DhruvDhody VishwasManral IETF 87 - Berlin, Germany v1

  2. Motivation Service Providers, Cable Companies, Mobile Operators, WiFi providers Thousands (or millions) of devices that need to be IP-addressable What happens when I need to extend my MPLS infrastructure/features/services to/through these IPv6-only nodes? MPLS/LDP is desired sooner than later in many v6 enabled networks: Get IPv6-only support on MPLS ahead of when we need it

  3. Progress: A Gap Analysis 3. Gap Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1. MPLS Data Plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2. MPLS Control Plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2.1. LDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2.2. Multicast LDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2.3. RSVP- TE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2.3.1. IGP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2.3.2. RSVP-TE-P2MP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.2.3.3. RSVP-TE FastReroute (FRR) . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.4. Controller, PCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.5. BGP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2.6. GMPLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.3. MPLS Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3.1. L2VPN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3.1.1. EVPN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3.2. L3VPN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.3.2.1. 6PE/4PE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.3.2.2. 6VPE/4VPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.3.2.3. BGP Encapsulation SAFI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 3.3.2.4. NG-MVPN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.3.3. MPLS-TP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

  4. Progress: A Gap Analysis 3. Gap Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.4. MPLS OAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.4.1. Extended ICMP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.4.2. LSP Ping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.4.3. BFD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.4.4. Pseudowires . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.4.5. MPLS-TP OAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.5. MIBs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 4. Gap Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

  5. Open Items – Questions What (if anything) is still missing? Does the structure of the document make sense? Agreements: This is a gap-analysis (and not solutions) document The scope is existing documents only – expectation of future docs should cover IPv6-only gap analysis

  6. Documents Status Review on list, looking forward to more WG feedback Request that MPLS WG adopts the document

  7. Thank You !

More Related