40 likes | 233 Views
TREE FRUITS. Brennan and Majority attempting to save proviso from being declared unconstitutional (see Black dissent) Places proviso within the framework of Section 8(b)(4), within which it is contained
E N D
TREE FRUITS • Brennan and Majority attempting to save proviso from being declared unconstitutional (see Black dissent) • Places proviso within the framework of Section 8(b)(4), within which it is contained • Unless it can be shown that consumer picketing aimed at struck product meets prohibited conduct & objects test, not unlawful • Consumer picketing does not • does not come within 8(b)(4)( i ) as no person encouraged to stop working • does not come within 8(b)(4)(ii) as does not restrain or coerce neutral
8(b)(4) Box Prohibited Means/Conduct & Prohibited Object Escape Hatch Nonpicketing to persuade customers CONSUMER PICKETING AIMED ONLY not to buy AT STRUCK GOODS at neutral
BUSH: . . . The voters will know I'll put competent judges on the bench, people who will strictly interpret the Constitution and will not use the bench to write social policy. . . . I believe that . . . the judges ought not to take the place of the legislative branch of government, that they're appointed for life and that they ought to look at the Constitution as sacred. They shouldn't misuse their bench. I don't believe in liberal, activist judges. I believe in . . . strict constructionists. And those are the kind of judges I will appoint. GORE: . . .I know that there are ways to assess how a potential justice interprets the Constitution. And, in my view, the Constitution ought to be interpreted as a document that grows with our country and our history. Judicial Philosophy SOURCE: Transcript of Presidential Debate, Boston, Mass., October 3, 2000, from http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/debates/transcripts/ u221003.html