230 likes | 314 Views
Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law. Law and the Possibility of Change. Agenda. 1. Law and the Possibility of Change 2. take-up R. v. Halpern 3. Rodriguez Case (textbook). Learning Goal for Today.
E N D
Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Law and the Possibility of Change
Agenda • 1. Law and the Possibility of Change • 2. take-up R. v. Halpern • 3. Rodriguez Case (textbook)
Learning Goal for Today • By the end of the lesson, students will be able to explain how law changes and how individuals and collective groups have influenced changes to the law
Expectations • Evaluate the influence of individual citizens who have fought to change the law • Assess the role of collective action in changing the law in democracies • CGE4c – responds to, manages and constructively influences change in a discerning manner • CGe7d – promotes the sacredness of life
*Factors Driving Change • Demographic – Boomers/fewer workers • Rural v. Urban - reversal • Gun Registry – fear/politics/perception
*Law and the Possibility of Change • Technological • Internet – jurisdiction and crime • International Travel – travel/deeming of sex crimes
*Law and the Possibility of Change • Automobile – required traffic laws • Medical Ethics – stem cell research, test-tube babies, cloning • Resources – international law issues, Antarctica, ocean, space
*Law and the Possibility of Change • National Emergencies… • Income Tax 1917 • Mandatory high school • 911
*Law and the Possibility of Change • Financial system meltdown the last four years • Societal Norms and Mores Change • Gay marriage (R. v. Halpern) • Euthanasia • Polygamy? • Decriminalization of marijuana?
*Law and the Possibility of Change • U.S. Constitution V amendment • *No person shall… be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury… nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law… • *Just write “5th amendment rights – right against self-incrimination & due process… “
*Law and the Possibility of Change • Where did the 5th amendment come from? • *The U.S. right was created in reaction to the excesses of the Courts of Star Chamber and High Commission—British courts of equity that operated from 1487-1641. These courts utilized the inquisitorial method of truth-seeking as opposed to the prosecutorial, meaning that prosecutors did not bear the burden of proving a case, but that sufficient "proof" came from browbeating confessions out of the accused. • *Just write reaction to “Star Chamber”
Law and the Possibility of Change • Canada does not have anything similar to the U.S. V amendment and a witness in Canada (other than an accused – they can’t be forced to testify) must answer all questions but whatever is said on the stand can’t be used against you • Witness in Canada is protected against that testimony being used against them in other proceedings (Charter s.13)
*Law and the Possibility of Change • Why is Canada different than the U.S.? • 1776 v. 1867 • Charter • Canada Judeo-Christian beliefs; confession and forgiveness
Law and the Possibility of Change • Privilege (against self-incrimination) – predated formation of U.S. because of state Bills of Rights • U.S. government - Bush - 911 – Guantanamo Bay - Star Chamber?
Law and the Possibility of Change • Al-Timimi (Islamic scholar convicted in U.S. of inciting terrorism) • U.S. Intelligence authorities were allowed to make classified submissions directly to the judge without allowing the defense or prosecutors access to them • Al-Timimi was convicted on 10 counts of inciting jihad and was sentenced to life in prison
Law and the Possibility of Change • In 2011, in R. v. Ahmad, the SCC held that in cases involving national security, if the government doesn’t want to have evidence revealed in open court, it is sometimes better to let a possible terrorist go free by staying the trial than to reveal national security information that would harm Canada’s national security by staying the trial
Law and the Possibility of Change • Guantanamo Bay • Combat Status Review Tribunals (Military Commissions) crafted to avoid standards of American military and civilian justice • Seemed like Obama was going to close facility • Obama blinked on issue
Law and the Possibility of Change • In response to 911, the U.S. and Canada passed anti-terrorism legislation defining what a terrorist is and bringing it within the criminal code
Seatwork/Homework Homework – read Rodriquez in textbook page 17 & do ?’s 1 & 2 on page 18 & Do Homework Addendum handout for Monday