1 / 31

4. Molecular Similarity

4. Molecular Similarity. Similarity and Searching. Historical Progression Similarity Measures Fingerprint Construction “Pathological” Cases MinMax- Counts Pruning Search Space Aggregate Queries LSH. Historical Progression. Maximum Common Subgraph-Isomorphism (MCS)

nen
Download Presentation

4. Molecular Similarity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 4. Molecular Similarity

  2. Similarity and Searching • Historical Progression • Similarity Measures • Fingerprint Construction • “Pathological” Cases • MinMax- Counts • Pruning Search Space • Aggregate Queries • LSH 2

  3. Historical Progression • Maximum Common Subgraph-Isomorphism (MCS) • maximum common substructure between to molecules. • “NP-complete” • Structural Keys • dictionary of predetermined, domain-specific sub-structures keyed to particular positions in a bit-vector constructed for each molecule • similarity computed between bit-vectors (fast O(D) scan) • 2D Compressed Fingerprints • ALL substructures stored in a bit-vector using a hashing scheme plus lossy compression (modulo operator) • Similarity computed between bit-vectors or count vectors • Faster Searches • database pruning • locality sensitive hashing (LSH): towards O(log n) similarity searching 3

  4. Superstructure and Substructure Searches • A is a superstructure of B (ignoring H) • B is a substructure of A • Tversky similarity B A 4

  5. The Similarity Problem How similar? 5

  6. Spectral Similarity • Count substructures • Compare the count/bit vectors 6

  7. 2D Graph Substructures • For chemical compounds • atom/node labels: A = {C,N,O,H, … } • bond/edge labels: B = {s, d, t, ar, … } • Trace ALL Paths • O(N*dl) • Cycles and trees • Combinatorial Space (CsNsCdO) 7

  8. Mapping Structures to Bits • Compact data representation • Hash each path to bit vector Feature space → Bit space • Resolve clashes with OR operator (i.e 1+1=1) 8

  9. Similarity Measures • There are many ways of measuring similarity (or distance) between bit/count vectors: • Euclidean • Cosine • Exponentials • Tanimoto/Jaccard • Tversky • MinMax • And many more (L1,L2,Lp,Hamming, Manhattan,….) 9

  10. 10

  11. 11

  12. A B a c b Similarity Measures: Tanimoto • Tally features: • Unique (a,b) • Both on (c) • Both off (d) • Similarity Formula • Tanimoto=c/(a+b+c) 12

  13. The Fingerprint Approximation • Fingerprint bit similarity approximates chemical feature similarity. 13

  14. A B a c b Similarity Measures: Tversky • Tally features: • Unique (a,b) • Both on (c) • Both off (d) • Similarity Formula • Tanimoto=c/(a+b+c) • Tversky(α,β)=c/(αa+βb+c) 14

  15. Pathological Cases On the Properties of Bit String-Based Measures of Chemical Similarity. Flower DR, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 379-386 15

  16. Pathological Cases Issue of labeling scheme. 16

  17. Counts • MinMax similarity is a generalization of Tanimoto which uses the counts. • MinMax can work better than Tanimoto. 17

  18. Pruning Search Space Using Bounds • Linear speedup (search CxD) for fixed threshold, often by one order of magnitude or more. • Sub-linear speedup (search CxD0.6) for top K. 18

  19. 19

  20. Speedup from Pruning Speedup depends on: • Threshold • Query • Fingerprint length • Database size 20

  21. 21

  22. 22

  23. Bias in Query Distribution 23

  24. 24

  25. 25

  26. Aggregate Queries (“Profiles”) 26

  27. Two Basic Strategies • Similar to bioinformatics • Aggregate individual pairwise measures • Build a fingerprint profile • Linear approaches • Non-linear approaches (consensus, modal, etc) • Hybrid (profile + aggregation/”scaling”)) • Profile-profile 27

  28. Aggregations 28

  29. Consensus Fingerprints • Create consensus fingerprint • Search database using the consensus & = 29

  30. Local Sensitive Hashing • Bin fingerprints based on projections onto randomly directed vectors • log D random vectors → O(log D) • Search for neighbors by returning bin corresponding to the query’s projection • Has been used for clustering. May be useful for building diverse data sets. Not yet developed for searching 30

  31. Outline • Historical Progression • Similarity Measures • Fingerprint Construction • Pathologic Cases • MinMax- Counts • Pruning Search Space • Aggregate Queries • LSH 31

More Related