1 / 34

Hadron spectroscopy Pentaquarks and baryon resonances

• Baryon resonances Quark model description ( deformed oscillator ) KN for L (1405) ~ importance of qq correlation qq vs qq Chiral symmetry • Pentaquarks Full 5-body calculation ~ qq Production of Q + ~ consistency of J-Lab and LEPS.

neo
Download Presentation

Hadron spectroscopy Pentaquarks and baryon resonances

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. • Baryon resonances Quark model description (deformed oscillator) KN for L(1405) ~ importance of qq correlation qq vs qq Chiral symmetry • Pentaquarks Full 5-body calculation ~ qq Production of Q+~ consistency of J-Lab and LEPS Hadron spectroscopyPentaquarks and baryon resonances Atsushi Hosaka, RCNP Osaka Univ. J-PARC workshop, KEK

  2. At low energies Lattice QCD does a lot: Masses, Form factors, Resonances, (Interactions) qq potential, Vacuum properties Exotics (pentaquarks,…)? Are there simple way to understand them? Global/local symmetry and its breaking Relevant degrees of freedom, effective interactions ElementaryExcitation of non-perturbative vacuum (Kunihiro) => Models of QCD hopefully with one or at most few But current understanding is not at this level J-PARC workshop, KEK

  3. Let us start with Quark model Simple setups: • SU(6) and small ms breaking • Harmonic oscillator potential, V(r) = kr2 • Effective residual interaction Gluons, Chiral mesons, instantons, … To test the quark model, let us see baryon states J-PARC workshop, KEK

  4. Well established states 49 ***,**** states out of 50 13 * , ** states out of 31 62 states out of 81 states But if we rearrange Light flavor (uds) baryons J-PARC workshop, KEK

  5. • Measured from the ground state • 8MS states are shifted downward by 200 MeV Positive parity baryons J-PARC workshop, KEK

  6. Negative parity baryons • Measured from the 1/2+ ground state • 48MS states are shifted downward by 200 MeV J-PARC workshop, KEK

  7. Deformed Oscillator Model Takayama-Toki-Hosaka Prog.Theor.Phys.101:1271-1283,1999 • Ground state: spherical • Excited states: Single particle excitation deforms the confining potential Deformed states rotate collectively => Resonances as collectively rotated states J-PARC workshop, KEK

  8. • Also qqq* states can mix with qqq(qq) L(1520) as a KN state => Hyodo • Chiral symmetry It seems that we make a good job BUT: Is this the end of the story??? Important questions: • Quark correlations qq or qq Roper as a diquark states => Nagata J-PARC workshop, KEK

  9. Role of qq (meson)correlation Meson clouds Long time being said, but renewed interests due to chiral perturbation and its unitarization Interaction Resonance L Tomozawa-Weinberg Basic assumptions: Ground state hadrons as building blocks: B and M Contact MB interaction dominates the s-wave dynamics J-PARC workshop, KEK

  10. The state is crucially important for the K-nuclei KN ~ 8 x 8 = 1, 8, 8, 10, 10, 27 attractive repulsive pS -> pS 1390 + 66i (pS) 1426 + 16i (KN) KN -> pS Jido-Oller-Oset-Ramos-Meissner, Nucl.Phys.A725:181-200,2003: nucl-th/0303062 L(1405) Two poles near Mass ~ 1405 K–p –> ppS, Magas-Oset-Ramos, Phys.Rev.Lett.95:052301,2005 J-PARC workshop, KEK

  11. qq-correlation vs.qq-correlation qq correlation is equally or more important than qq for equal masses. If m>>m, then qq is suppressed In the quark language Color-spin interaction qq(C, S) (3*C, 0S) (3*C, 1S) (6C, 0S) (6C, 1S) –1/2 +1/6 +1/4 –1/12 qq(C, S) (1C, 0S) (1C, 1S) (8C, 0S) (8C, 1S) –1 +1/3 +1/8 –1/24 To see qq correlations, heavy quark systems may be suited J-PARC workshop, KEK

  12. Chiral symmetry Conventional wisdom: • Chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken • <qq> condenses • Quarks couples to <qq> and obtain a constituent mass Questions: • What is the coupling of hadrons to <qq> ~ Hadron mass • What are chiral (parity) partners • What is the realization of chiral symmetry Linear vs. non-linear J-PARC workshop, KEK

  13. Small fp , ms Large fp , ms They are related to: How far our world is from the symmetric world How strongly chiral symmetry is broken J-PARC workshop, KEK

  14. If symmetry breaking is not very large => Particles in chiral group representations SU(2)L x SU(2)R Baryons: (1/2, 0), (1, 1/2), (3/2, 0), …. N N, D, D, with mixings Mesons: (0, 0), (1/2, 1/2), (1, 0), … s , s, p, r, a1 • For baryons, chiral partners can be made by Particles of the same parity(N, D, R) S. Weinberg,Phys.Rev.177:2604-2620, 1969 Particles of opposite parities (N, N*) Jido-Hosaka-Oka,Prog.Theor.Phys.106:873-908,2001 Jido-Hatsuda-Kunihiro, Phys.Rev.Lett.84:3252,2000 J-PARC workshop, KEK

  15. • gA ~ 1.25 close to 1 => N ~ (1/2, 0) + (1, 1/2) • There could be N* of gA < 0 • Masses of chiral partners degenerate as symmetry recovers BUT we need more studies to clarify the role of chiral symmetry J-PARC workshop, KEK

  16. Pentaquarks J-PARC workshop, KEK

  17. qq qq 5-body calculation for Q+ Hiyama et al, hep-ph/0507105 Most serious calculation for 5-body system with scattering states included Gaussian expansion method + NK-scattering Q+-confined Compute phase shifts J-PARC workshop, KEK

  18. Hamiltonian NR quark model of Isgur-Karl J-PARC workshop, KEK

  19. • Mass is too high • Strong qs correlation –> JW configuration is suppressed Diquark formation is a dynamical problem KN-phase shifts 1/2+ Eres ~ 530 MeV Gres ~ 110 MeV J-PARC workshop, KEK

  20. Production J-PARC workshop, KEK

  21. g p –> n K+ K0 g d --> K+ K- p (n) g10 CLAS g11 ? Preliminary LEPS g d -> K+ K– p n g n -> n K+ K– J-Lab J-PARC workshop, KEK

  22. Beam line LEPS J-Lab LEPS has observed but CLAS does not Observation 1 LEPS: forward angle region CLAS: side J-PARC workshop, KEK

  23. Observation 2 Nam-Hosaka-Kim, hep-ph/0503149, PRD, 71:114012,2005 hep-ph/0505134 • Large p, n asymmetry (Charge exchange) >> (Charge non-exchange) • Strongly forward peaking J-PARC workshop, KEK

  24. Effective Lagrangian approach u s t contact present only for charge exchange n –> Q+ or p –> L(1520) J-PARC workshop, KEK

  25. gn -> K– L(1520) and gp -> K0 L(1520) Before the Q-production was studied and large pn asymmetry was known to us Nam-Hosaka-Kim, hep-ph/0503149 to appear PRD Energy dependence t (or q) dependence J-PARC workshop, KEK

  26. L(1520) JP = 3/2– gp –> K+L(1520) Charge exchange L = 700 MeV <=> r ~ 0.8 fm Contact term • Large pn asymmetry • Strong forward peak • Polarization?? To be checked by experiments J-PARC workshop, KEK

  27. For Q+ gn –> K–Q+ Charge exchange G = 1 MeV, L = 700 MeV <=> r ~ 0.8 fm The total cross section is very sensitive to L • Large pn asymmetry • If Q+ is larger in size, s may be smaller and strongly forward peaking •s ~ few nb or less -> consistent with the CLAS result J-PARC workshop, KEK

  28. Summary • Hadrons seem to need different ingredients: constituent quarks, diquarks, mesons, chiral symmetries. • Perhaps we need a simple setup having a predictive power, consistent with QCD, and explaining ground to resonant states, decay/productions,… • Pentaquarks may still survive, which should be explained by the same setup • Experimentally: exotics containing multi-quarks and antiquarks are good laboratory to study the relevant questions. J-PARC workshop, KEK

  29. J-PARC workshop, KEK

  30. Why hadrons? Everybody knows that: • The core of matter (made of atoms) • Strongly interacting quantum system of QCD • Rich aspects in phase structure They are based on: hadron structure and reactions from quarks (QCD) J-PARC workshop, KEK

  31. But not so easy Due to non-perturbative dynamics Color confinement and chiral symmetry breaking Is it possible to describe hadron properties? Can we predict masses, form factors, decay/production rates and so on? Can we predict unknown states prior to experiment? J-PARC workshop, KEK

  32. Log-scale Theta production, JP = 3/2 Total s Log-scale Angular dist neutron ~ forward peak Contact term proton ~ rather flat J-PARC workshop, KEK

  33. Good for conventional baryons Charge radii Mass Magnetic moments J-PARC workshop, KEK

  34. LEPS: deuteron -> (Theta, L(1520)) L(1520) We need to understand g K d • Reaction mechanism Soft K? N MNK Q • Elementary process Q+, L(1520) production • Consistency between the J-Lab experiment J-PARC workshop, KEK

More Related