190 likes | 379 Views
UNRSC Good Practices Group. Update. What results in a GPM?. Demand for guidelines or materials Scientific evidence of a problem and a solution Funding. 3 New items. Distracted Driving Resource Heavy Vehicle Guidelines Pedestrian Good Practice Manual. What is driver distraction?.
E N D
UNRSC Good Practices Group Update
What results in a GPM? Demand for guidelines or materials Scientific evidence of a problem and a solution Funding
3 New items Distracted Driving Resource Heavy Vehicle Guidelines Pedestrian Good Practice Manual
What is driver distraction? Inattention that results from a trigger diverting a driver's attention away from "primary" task (driving) towards a "secondary" task (non driving) Driver distraction is one form of a broader issue of driver inattention
Mobile phone use Exponential ownership over the last decade Demand for growth likely to be driven by LMIC market Highest use among young people Rapid growth in text messaging services
Conclusions from research Increasing and broad problem of growth of telematics Detrimental effect on driving behaviour Approx increase of 4 in crash risk Hands-free no different crash risk to hand-held Need for countries to begin to collect data on the problem and to evaluate interventions put into place.
Impact upon driving behaviour Increased reaction time (especially braking time) Lane deviation Impaired ability to maintain appropriate speed Shorter following distances Decreased awareness of road safety situation
Hand-held vs hands-free No evidence to suggest that hands-free phones are safer in terms of driving performance Cognitive distraction seems to have the most impact upon driving behaviour Compensatory behaviour
Other road users? Likely to be a potential issue among motorcyclists and pedestrians, where VRUs are most affected and where mobile phone use is growing Some research on cognitive distraction among pedestrians suggest increased risk
Interventions Legislation and enforcement Employer policies Data collection policies Public awareness Technological solutions Need for evidence
Heavy Vehicles Need for international resource, not just regional Funding – around $350,000 Branding and logos
Pedestrian GPM • World Health Organization • Meleckidzedeck Khayesi
Outline Background Target audience and scope Methods Proposed TOC Proposed working group members Timeline
Target audience and scope • Decision-makers and practitioners • Scope: all aspects of pedestrian safety • Evidence (magnitude, risk factors and effective interventions) • Solutions (what can be done) • Examples of successful practice
Methods • Consultative approach • Three working groups • Advisory • Technical support • Writers
Proposed TOC • Introduction • Module 1: Setting the context • Pedestrian in road safety and transport planning • Module 2: Situational assessment • Module 3:Preparing a pedestrian safety programme • Module 4: Implementing a pedestrian safety programme • Module 5: Evaluating a pedestrian safety programme
Proposed working group members Advisory panel Technical panel Writers
Timeline Start date: January 2011 End date: December 2013 Launch: 2014
For input & questions Gayle Di Pietro gayle.dipietro@ifrc.org