1 / 9

BEL WG Feedback

BEL WG Feedback. NACSO Members Meeting 8 th August 2008. Training. Computer Training – 14 courses (Word, Excel, Powerpoint , Access) and 197 person days of training. SME Tourism Guidelines – 21 CSD participants – 5 day course.

neola
Download Presentation

BEL WG Feedback

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BEL WG Feedback NACSO Members Meeting 8th August 2008

  2. Training • Computer Training – 14 courses (Word, Excel, Powerpoint, Access) and 197 person days of training. • SME Tourism Guidelines – 21 CSD participants – 5 day course. Expected impact – improved CBNRM staff work performance and collaboration.

  3. Case Study Development • 9 Case Studies developed to capture enterprise successes (& failures), lessons learned and recommendations for the future. • JV Lodges – Brandberg White Lady, Nawas, Damaraland Camp, Grootberg and Namushasha. • Campsites – Granietkop & Nambwa • Crafts – Daureb, Mashi • Guides – Kasika / Impalila Expected Impact – celebrate successes with local feedback, “program learning” and improved CBNRM staff implementation. Increase positive profile of Namibia CBNRM program.

  4. Conservancy Impact Reports (members perceptions) • 5 Conservancy Poverty Impact Reports – NyaeNyae, Salambala, Mayuni, Torra & KhoadiHoas. • Captures members perceptions of conservancies performance and contribution to poverty alleviation. Expected Impact – allows support agencies to better understand members perceptions and therefore address these through implementation resulting in improved support and improved conservancy performance.

  5. CBNRM - Sustainable funding • Survey in 4 key European tourism source markets (Germany, UK, Netherlands and Sweden) to determine the level of interest amongst tour agencies and tourists to contribute directly towards the CBNRM program in Namibia via a “conservation contribution”. • Potential in some countries for WWF “endorsement” to boost marketing. Expected Impact – Potential contributions of N$1-3 million to CBNRM program annually.

  6. CBNRM & Carbon Trading • Initial discussions with partners & government in a series of meetings – especially regarding the “Voluntary Carbon Trading” market. • Concept of “packaging” CBNRM as a “Carbon-Plus product” to generate income. Expected Impact – Potential income of several million N$ annually from sale of C-Plus product to international (and local) markets.

  7. Craft Reviews • Crafts Reviews of Erongo and Kunene (funded via CESP) • Examine existing and potential craft production and products – Identify additional opportunities. Expected Impact – Better understanding of existing craft performance and potential for improvement / expansion. Identify where additional resources are needed (support agencies / consultants / funding etc.)

  8. JV Guidelines • Development of User Guide for JV practitioners. • Provide practical step-by-step explanation of processes and tools. • Case studies. Expected Impact – broaden and deepen understanding of JV lodges and improve CBNRM staff implementation.

  9. Issues requiring input • Carbon Trading – need to dedicate a full time person / consultant to examine how the CBNRM program can best exploit this opportunity. • C-Brand – need to launch this and start processing applications (linked to the above and the conservation contribution) • Marketing – need to dedicate a full time person / consultant to ensure existing and future marketing efforts (e.g. NTB, Open Africa, MCA) are well co-ordinated and conservancy enterprises and JV’s get maximum exposure.

More Related