1 / 33

Screening and Assessment of Co-Occurring Disorders

2007 Drug and DUI Conference May 30, 2007 Peachtree City, Georgia Roger H. Peters, Ph.D., University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; Peters@fmhi.usf.edu. Screening and Assessment of Co-Occurring Disorders.

nero-cross
Download Presentation

Screening and Assessment of Co-Occurring Disorders

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2007 Drug and DUI Conference May 30, 2007 Peachtree City, Georgia Roger H. Peters, Ph.D., University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; Peters@fmhi.usf.edu Screening and Assessment of Co-Occurring Disorders

  2. TIP 44: Substance Abuse Treatment for Adults in the Criminal Justice System

  3. To Order TIP 44 and Products Based on TIP 44 To obtain free copies: • Call SAMHSA’s National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information (NCADI) at 800-729-6686 • Visit NCADI’s Web site atwww.ncadi.samhsa.gov • Request items BKD 526 (TIP 44) • QGCT44 (Quick Guide) • KAPT44 (KAP Keys)

  4. http://coce.samhsa.gov/

  5. Goals of this Presentation Review: • How to access relevant resources • Challenges in screening and assessing for CODs in specialty courts • Instruments used to screen and assess for CODs • Specialized COD screening and assessment strategies in specialty courts • Approaches for determining program eligibility in specialty courts

  6. “Co-Occurring Disorders” Defined The presence of at least two disorders: • One being substance abuse or dependence • The other being a DSM-IV major mental disorder, usually Major Depression, Bipolar Disorder, or Schizophrenia

  7. Offenders with Co-Occurring Disorders • Persons with CODs repeatedly cycle through the criminal justice and treatment systems • Likely to experience problems when not taking medication, not in treatment, experiencing mental health symptoms, using alcohol or drugs • Use of even small amounts of alcohol or drugs may trigger recurrence of mental health symptoms

  8. High Severity Low Severity High Severity Typical Location of Services for Different Co-Occurring Populations Substance Use Disorders Mental Health Disorders

  9. Prevalence of Mental Illness in Justice Settings by Gender GenderState PrisonJailProbation Male 16% 16% 15% Female 24% 23% 22% * Reported either a mental/emotional condition or an overnight stay in a mental hospital or program. (U.S. Department of Justice, 1999)

  10. Rates of Substance Abuse Among Inmates with Mental Disorders 75% of jail detainees with serious mental disorders have either a drug or alcohol use disorder (Osher, 2002)

  11. At risk for relapse Criminality/criminal thinking Housing needs Transportation needs Family reunification Job skills deficits Educational deficits Stigma related to criminal history and SA and MH disorders Scarce prevention and treatment resources Challenges in Addressing CODs

  12. Outcomes Related to CODs • More rapid progression from initial use to substance dependence • Poor adherence to medication • Decreased likelihood of treatment completion • Greater rates of hospitalization • More frequent suicidal behavior • Difficulties in social functioning • Shorter time in remission of symptoms

  13. Clinical Considerations • Cognitive impairment • Reduced motivation • Impairment in social functioning (Bellack, 2003)

  14. Elements of Cognitive Impairment • Difficulty comprehending or remembering important information (e.g., verbal memory) • Not recognize consequences of behavior (e.g., planning abilities) • Poor judgment • Disorganization • Limited attention span • Not respond well to confrontation

  15. Why Traditional MH Programs are not Effective for Offenders with CODs • Unaddressed and ongoing SA interferes with individuals’ ability to follow MH treatment recommendations • Active substance use interferes with effectiveness of MH treatment (i.e., medications, etc.) • MH treatment may not focus on changing substance useand other maladaptive behaviors

  16. Why Traditional SA Programs are not Effective for Offenders with CODs • Absence of accurate MH diagnosis prevents effective treatment • Cognitive impairment detracts from understanding and processing information • Confrontational approaches used in SA treatment are not well tolerated • Frustration and dropout may result from requirements of abstinence

  17. Why Screen and Assess for CODs? • High prevalence rates of mental health and substance abuse disorders in justice settings • Persons with undetected disorders are likely to cycle back through the criminal justice system • Allows for treatment planning and linking to appropriate treatment services

  18. Enhancing Accuracy of Screening and Assessment • Maintain high index of suspicion for both disorders • Use non-judgmentalapproach and motivational interviewing techniques • Gather substance abuse information beforemental health information • Supplement self-report with collateral information

  19. Engage Identify collaterals Screen for COD Determine Quadrant Determine level of care Diagnosis Disabilities and Impairments Strengths and supports Cultural and linguistic needs Problem Domains Stage of Change Plan Treatment The COD Assessment Process (SAMHSA TIP 42)

  20. Mental Health Screens • Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) • Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90-R) • MINI Structured Interview (MINI) • Mental Health Screening Form – III • Trauma Symptom Inventory (TSI) • Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN)

  21. Substance Abuse Screens • Simple Screening Instrument (SSI) • Texas Christian University Drug Screen (TCUDS) • Addiction Severity Index (ASI) – Alcohol and Drug Abuse section • Alcohol Dependence Scale (ADS) • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) • Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN)

  22. New and Specialized Screens • BASIS-24 • Brief Jail Mental Health Screen (BJMHS) • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Concurrent Disorders Screener (CAMH-CDS) • Dartmouth Assessment of Lifestyle Instrument (DALI) • Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM)

  23. Instruments Related to Motivation/Stages of Change • CMRS • RCQ • SOCRATES • TCU Treatment Motivation Scales • URICA

  24. Screening for Trauma/PTSD • All women in the justice system should be screened for trauma history • Initial screen does not have to be conducted by a mental health professional; doesn’t require discussion of specific details • Many simple, non-proprietary screening instruments are available • Positive screens should be referred for more comprehensive assessment

  25. Screening for Trauma/PTSD • Screening environment should be safe, private, free from startling noises, provide adequate interpersonal distance • Important to identify the symptoms of trauma – a more comprehensive assessment can be conducted later • Assess for head injury - this affects ability to use information, follow directions, adjust to different surroundings

  26. Assessment Considerations • Substance abuse can mimicall major mental health disorders • Several strategies will help to gauge the potential effects of SA on MH disorders • Use drug testing to verify abstinence • Take a longitudinal history of MH and SA symptom interaction • Compile diagnostic impressions over a period of time • Repeat assessment over time

  27. Key Assessment Information • Scope and severity of MH and SA disorders • Pattern of interaction between the disorders • Conditions associated with occurrence and maintenance of the disorders • Other problems related to the disorders or affecting treatment • Motivationfor treatment • Family and social relationships • Physical health status and medical history • Areas for treatment interventions

  28. ASAM PPC-2R: Integration of Criteria for CODs • Dual diagnosis “capable” programs • Dual diagnosis “enhanced” programs • Specialized approaches for “assessment and treatment plan review” • Severity of MH and SA problems determine initial placement

  29. Assessing Program Eligibility 1. Review existing program resources to work with co-occurring disorders • Staff with MH and SA treatment experience • Linkages with institutional and community-based MH and SA services • Specialized “tracks”, groups, or other services for co-occurring disorders • Psychiatric/medication consultation

  30. Assessing Program Eligibility 2. Determine functioning level required for program participation • Treatment groups • Therapeutic communities • Community supervision • Employment and peer support programs

  31. Assessing Program Eligibility 3. Examine broad categories of functioning • Cognitive functioning • Major mental health symptoms • Unusual behaviors • Ability to interact with staff and participants (e.g., group settings) • How responds to stress • Reading, language abilities

  32. The Importance of Data Capturing data reflecting the complexity of the population you serve can be persuasive to staff and funders.

More Related