1 / 12

THE STORY OF THE EXERCISE

THE STORY OF THE EXERCISE. Task C. Exercise In case of no deployment by 31 Dec 2011 one full scale exercise. Christchurch eqk , New Zealand 22.02.2011 , outside 15.000 Km Tohoku eqk , Japan, 11.03.2011 Nuclear risk

nero
Download Presentation

THE STORY OF THE EXERCISE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE STORY OF THE EXERCISE

  2. Task C. Exercise In case of no deployment by 31 Dec 2011 one full scale exercise • Christchurch eqk, New Zealand22.02.2011, outside15.000 Km • Tohokueqk, Japan, 11.03.2011 Nuclearrisk • Lorca eqk, Spain, 11.05.2011 No request • Van eqk, Turkey, 23.10.2011 No request

  3. Aims of the exercise • To test: • The deploymentcapabilites • the on-site operationalcapabilities

  4. Selected country : Greece Motivations: - European Country - MS, EU CP Participant - Relativelyclose to Italy - Road and seedeployment - Seismicrisk prone country - Expertise on safetyassessment - National procedures for safetyassessment - Language and alphabetdifficulties

  5. Period Initial date: 2nd week of May Postponed a first time because of politicalelections in Greece Postponed a second time because of the Emilia (IT) eqk Final date: 3-5 October2012

  6. The selected site: Patras • Motivation: • A Mw=6.5 earthquakeoccurred on 8 June2008 at17 Km of distance from Patras • Severaldamagedbuildings, some of themstillnotrepaired • Ideal for a realisticsafetyassessment and short termcountermeasures • Selected by the Greekinstitutions

  7. Damagedbuildingsat the time of the earthquake (2008)

  8. Greekcounterparts • General Secretariat for CivilProtection • Western GreeceCivilProtection • Service for Rehabilitation (YAS), Min.Publ.Works • TAS (Regional Office of YAS) • Local authorities(Police, Port authority) • Strong willingness to host the exercise • (Notusual wide-rangingactivity, technicallyrelevant, social impact, high motivations, …)

  9. Exercise planning October the 1st, Monday, Seismicevent Event Notification to the MIC Request of assistance Offer and acceptance of the Build-Safemodule October the 2nd, Tuesday Pre-team departure by plane to Athens (Head of mission, International LO, team leaders of BSA, ASA, STC modules) Departure ASA personnel by plane to Athens Departure ASA material & equipment by ferry from Ancona Departure BSA, STC pers, mater, equip, by ferry from Bari

  10. October the 3nd , Wednesday, morning Pre-team arrivalatPatras Meeting with LEMA Base Camp location Technical activitiesassignment October the 3nd , Wednesday, afternoon Team arrivaland entry formalities Camp mounting Beginning of technicalactivities

  11. October the 4th, Thursday Technical activies Final meeting with LEMA Camp dismounting October the 5th, Friday Debriefing Observer’sevaluation Team demobilization Pre-team departure

  12. Involvedpersonnel Total=105 ItalianBuild-SafeModule Modulecoordination (DPC) 7 BSA Module 15 ASA Module 15 STC Module 26 Total 63 Greeknationalresponse National CivilProtection 2 (+2) Western GreeceCivilProtection 1 YAS 12 TAS 14 Total 30 Observers 8 Managegement, documentation 4 Back

More Related