1 / 23

Development of Russian Securitization Regulation

This presentation discusses the development of securitization regulation in Russia, its advantages, and the demand for competitive regulation. It also covers the scope of regulation, sample securitization structures, and the types of securitizable assets. Furthermore, it addresses the problems with securitization, current specific regulations in Russia, and the need for more specific and competitive regulation. The presentation concludes by highlighting the advantages of Russian general regulations and the potential benefits of securitization in the Russian financial system.

nevada
Download Presentation

Development of Russian Securitization Regulation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Development of Russian Securitization Regulation Presentation for : International Conference Asset Securitization in Russia and CIS Frankfurt June 21-22, 2007 RuMAC

  2. Lets start with basics Law & Economics “…Economics…is a real basis, on top of which lays legislative and political superstructure…” (K. Marx, 1859,A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy) …Russian regulators should have known that. • Contents: • What is to be regulated? • Levels of regulation: from general to specific • Advantages of Russian law with regard to securitization • Demand for competitive regulation RuMAC

  3. Scope of regulation • Securitization is the sale of equity or debt instruments, representing ownership interest in, or secured by, a segregated, income producing asset or pool of assets, in a transaction structured to reduce or reallocatecertain risk inherent in owning or lending against the underlying assets and to ensure that such interests are more readily marketable and, thus, more liquid than ownership interests in and loans against the underlying assets. RuMAC

  4. Sample Securitization Structure Trustee Protects investor’s security interests in the collateral, maintain cash reserve accounts, and perform other duties Bank Assignment Agreements Bank loan portfolio ABS Seller/Servicer/ Asset Manager Assigns portfolio of loans to the Issuer of rated securities, monitors portfolio performance, and performs credit evaluation, loan servicing, and collections Investor Issuer (Trust) SPV Purchases loans and issues ABS, using loan as collateral proceeds proceeds Interest and principal Swap Counterparty Provides swap to hedge against currency and/or interest-related risk RuMAC

  5. Types of Securitizable Assets Essentially any assets or pools of similar assets producing more or less predictable stream of cash flows • Example: • Any type of consumer loans (car loans, credit card loans, mortgages, student loans) • Lease Payments • Commercial loans (SMI loans, commercial mortgages ) • Royalty Stream ( David Bowie Bond) RuMAC

  6. Problems with Securitization • ABS is a STRUCTURED finance transaction. The core of ABS is a negotiable instrument (security) • So… Securitization is a market for BIG GUYS • BIG GUYS are sensitive to regulations • There IS a COMPETITION of JURISDICTIONS • Regulators should fight for a piece of ABS market RuMAC

  7. Law & Securitization General Reg. Directly Related reg. Specific reg. RuMAC

  8. Specific regulation: bad , but getting better total overregulation total deregulation Specific regulation Russia Mortgage assets EU US Russia Other assets RuMAC

  9. Specific regulation: What we have now • Federal law “On Security Market” (covered bonds) • Federal law “On Investment Funds” (quasi-ABS) • Federal law “On Mortgage-Backed Securities” (MBS) • Regulations of Federal Financial Market Service RuMAC

  10. One example • 2006 – Gazprombank and Sovfintrade closed the first ever Russian MBS. We faced: • 6 boxes of transaction documents, or otherwise • More than 15 000 pages of transaction documents, or otherwise • Over 100 kilos of paper WHO IS GOING TO READ ALL THIS? RuMAC

  11. What we expect • Federal law “On Asset-Baked Securitization” • With regard to specific ABS regulation it leaves much to be desired RuMAC

  12. Related regulation OK  and improving • Federal law “On Mortgages” • Federal Housing Code • Federal law “On State Registration of Real Estate Properties” • Some amendments are currently being drafted RuMAC

  13. General regulation: good  and becoming adopted with case practice • Federal Civil Code • Federal Tax Code • Federal law “On bankruptcy” RuMAC

  14. Another example • 2005 – Bank of Housing Finance closed the first ever Russian covered bond issue (on-balance sheet securitization of apartment presales). • Collaterization was fully based on Federal Civil Code provisions. No specific regulation applied. RuMAC

  15. Some advantages of Russian general regulations RuMAC

  16. Russia desperately needs competitive specific regulation Accumulation of amortizing assets on Russian banks’ balance sheet is a ticking bomb waiting to explode……………… Financial engineering tools available through securitization can re-distribute the prepayment and credit risks through the financial system RuMAC

  17. Why? Look around! Historical Federal Reserve Funds Rate Source: Federal Reserve RuMAC

  18. Historical 30 year Fixed-Rate Mortgage Rates RuMAC Source: Freddie Mac

  19. The Result… The ultimate cost of the crisis was estimated to total around USD$150 billion, about $125 billion of which was consequently and directly subsidized by the U.S. government, which contributed to the large budget deficits of the early 1990s. Over 1000 S&L Institutions failed! RuMAC

  20. In Russia • We are leaving in a magic universe of constantly declining interest rates and rising real estate prices… • If real estate market conditions change when the interest rates shall start rising? RuMAC

  21. Lets finish with basics: • Regulator does not have time to waste… • Regulator must realize that there are another jurisdictions • If necessary Marx is still available in any Russian public library RuMAC

  22. This is who we are.. Prof. Vladimir Ponomarev, CEO – prior to joining RuMAC was deputy head of Russian Builders Association. Originally trained as a mathematitian and physicist he is the author of over 140 scientific publications and books as well as holder of several patents. Along his academic carrier Prof. Ponomarev spent years in the administrative positions, among others as a Deputy Minister of Construction ( Gosstroy). Prof. Ponomarev holds MA in Mathematical Physics from University of Warsaw, PhD in Mathematical Physics from Moscow State University and MA in Economics from Moscow State University Alexander Kazakov, Chief Legal Counsel – prior to joining RuMAC was a senior lawyer at Moscow based law firm Linia Prava and prior to this a Chief Legal Councilor at AIJK. Alex is a member of the group of experts on Mortgage Law and Securitization Law at the Russian Parliament. He brings over 8 years of legal experience practicing Russian corporate and securitization law. One of his most recent achievements was the first on-balance sheet Rubble MBS issue for the Bank of Housing Finance in Moscow. Alex holds a Law Degree from Moscow Institute of International Relations as well as an LLM from University of Leiden, Holland Dmitri Dorofeev, CFO – prior to joining RuMAC worked at Greenwich Financial Services, L.L.C. covering institutional clients as well as working on two pioneering transactions that GFS brought to market – the first rue sale pass-through securitization in Russia for Bank “Soyuz” and pass-through Mortgage Loan securitization for CityMortgage Bank. Dmitri brings over 12 years of experience trading and selling fixed income securities and equity derivatives for Dresdner Bank, Goldman Sachs and Salomon Smith Barney. Dmitri holds an MA in International Economics from Voznesensky Academy of Finance and Economics, St. Petersburg and MBA in Analytic Finance from the University of Chicago Sergei Kaduk – Head of Research. Prior to joining RuMAC, Sergei was a Senior Associate with the KPMG Structured Finance Group in McLean, VA. Sergei has modelled and provided due diligence on numerous MBS, ABS, CDO and NIM transactions, with specialization in whole loan MBS. One of his last assignments at KPMG was advising on the CityMortgage securitization. Sergei holds an M.S. in Mathematics and Applied Mathematics and a B.A. in Economics from Moscow State University as well as an MBA from the University of Virginia Darden School of Business, with a concentration in Finance. Russell Mueller – prior to joining RuMAC worked at Greenwich Financial Services, L.L.C. covering a wide range of major institutional clients in US and UK. Russell’s experience on the US Mortgage Market started with it inception in the late 80s. During his almost 10 years carrier as an MBS trader at Morgan Stanley in New York he traded a wide range of mortgage instruments and their derivatives. In his later years at the firm Russ was running the CMO desk. RuMAC

  23. Contact Information: aak@rumac.net www.rumac.net Tel.: +7 (495) 787-1177 RuMAC

More Related