190 likes | 277 Views
SUVs and Automobile Insurance Costs SUV Drivers Have Different Underlying Liability Loss Costs. Michael C. Dubin, FCAS, MAAA, MCA 1999 CAS Seminar on Ratemaking March 11 and 12 Opryland Hotel, Nashville. Why We’re Here. Vehicles on the road changing
E N D
SUVs and Automobile Insurance CostsSUV Drivers Have Different Underlying Liability Loss Costs Michael C. Dubin, FCAS, MAAA, MCA 1999 CAS Seminar on Ratemaking March 11 and 12 Opryland Hotel, Nashville
Why We’re Here • Vehicles on the road changing • Allegations that SUVs are more dangerous for passengers of other vehicles • Question liability rating plans that do not consider vehicle class
Topics of Discussion • The changing market • “Ideal” characteristics of rating plans • Options for including new rating variable • Next steps for actuaries
The Changing Market • Not much reflection of vehicle class in liability rates • Progressive, Farmers examples • Establish market niche or improve loss ratio • May not want to lead market • Soft market
Example • Protection of a program's financial soundness • Enhanced fairness • Economic incentive
Ideal Characteristics of Rating Plans • Statistical considerations • Operational considerations • Hazard reduction incentives • Public acceptability • Causality • Controllability
Statistical Considerations • Homogeneity, Credibility, Predictive Stability • Studies show more injuries to occupants in vehicles hit by SUVs than hit by cars • Studies shows more damage to vehicle hit by SUVs than hit by cars • Not fully explained by weight difference • Historically not needed • Original assumptions no longer valid
Statistical Considerations • Supported by data • Information is readily available • What data to use • How to model data • Not enough mature data
Fatality Rate by Weight Class of Other VehicleFor 3 Types of Other Vehicle Insurance Institute for Highway Safety
Operational Considerations • Expense (practicality and cost effectiveness) • Constancy, absence of ambiguity • Measurability and objectivity • Manipulation
Hazard Reduction Incentives • Believe auto makers are responsible for correcting incompatibility • Insurance industry dictates automobile safety • Mercedes-Benz • US Manufacturers • Crash tests
Public Acceptability • Afraid of upsetting customers • Regulatory issues • Public believes SUV have higher potential liability • Public believes that SUV owners should pay more for auto liability insurance • Customers think it is fair
Causality • Not a requirement for risk classification systems • Clear and relevant relationship to insured hazard
Controllability • Aware of dangers SUV’s pose to people in cars • Likely that liability rates will increase • Voluntarily increasing potential liability
Available Options for Incorporating Vehicle Class • Make SUV a rating variable • Rate SUV separately vs. cars • Add adjustment factor for certain vehicles • Generalized Linear Modeling could solve SUV issue and many others • Take advantage of increasing computer power
Next Steps for Us Actuaries • Meets ratemaking criteria for adjusting class plan • Think of new ways to look at data • Decide whether data reveal iniquity in rates • If so, think of new ways to make rates • Consider underwriting, marketing and overall objectives