200 likes | 268 Views
Discover the importance of assessing building energy performance to reduce carbon footprint, improve efficiency, and meet standards. Learn about ASHRAE protocols, comparison standards, and energy benchmarking data for informed decision-making.
E N D
Why Care About Building Energy Performance? • Aside from building energy increasing? • Ignoring performance ratings is choosing to fly fairly blind — staying at the “dumb” end of the “dumb and dumber” scale • Performance ratings are an evaluation, quickly, and not an investigation
New Construction has been a problem for 50 years, increasing carbon footprint • 2003 CBECS data with malls, kBtu/sq-ft-yr weighted means, higher source energy EUIs in newer buildings • CBECS data show same pattern with each survey year, life-cycle influences are shown
Basic Energy Benchmarking (Performance) Info • Go to TC 7.6 website (shown on title slide previously) • Select Program Activities at bottom • Chicago 2006, Seminar 17, first presentation • Atlantic City 2002, Seminar 41, first two presentations
Current ASHRAE High-Performance Protocol Project • “ASHRAE needs to provide guidance regarding the measurement and reporting of the performance of new and existing [commercial] buildings . . . .” • “ . . . to further the development of building energy performance standards.” • “Measuring and Reporting the On-site Performance of Buildings . . .”
ASHRAE STANDARD 105 1984 to now • BSR / ANSI / ASHRAE Standard 105-1984 (RA99) covers measurement and expression of building energy performance at a basic level, with suggested optional extensions • Standard 105-[2007?] is a major revision and has been submitted for publication. It extends the coverage of energy performance measurement and expression, and comparison of building energy performance against others • The nature and level of performance comparison requires some performance “standard” and requires or intrinsically offers some evaluation
Standards of Comparison • Minimum prescriptions or best practice levels (Stds 90.1, 90.2, 189P, LEED) • Self-reference, e.g., past and future • Ad-hoc building populations • Representative populations, e.g., CBECS, RECS for USA and CEUS for CA
2007 Applications HandbookEnergy Comparisons using CBECS • Chapter 35, energy management, 3 tables on commercial buildings • Based on 2003 CBECS micro-data without malls • About 50 building types • Site energy use indexes for mean and percentiles 10, 25, 50, 75, and 90 • Electricity and cost indexes at same detail
Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey, CBECS • Latest survey micro data available = 2003, next is 2007 (released in 2010?) • Publicly available government reports and data on EIA website • Nationally representative sample, with fairly complicated cluster sampling frame • Different versions have been available, ~5,000 records • Not including imputation flags, there are ~350 data parameters • Data seem to get better each time