220 likes | 360 Views
The Chandra view of Mrk 279. Elisa Costantini SRON, National Institute for Space Research Astronomical Institute Utrecht. Outline. Mrk 279 Chandra-LETGS observation Emission spectrum Broad lines UV– X-rays modeling Absorption components Warm absorber Redshift zero absorption
E N D
The Chandra view of Mrk 279 Elisa Costantini SRON, National Institute for Space Research Astronomical Institute Utrecht
Outline Mrk 279 Chandra-LETGS observation Emission spectrum • Broad lines • UV– X-rays modeling Absorption components • Warm absorber • Redshift zero absorption Conclusions Warsaw warm absorber workshop
Mrk 279 previous study • z = 0.0306 • ASCA (Weaver et al. 2001) • Variable iron line at 6.4 keV • On the line of sight of ionized gas at z=0 (Savage et al. 2003) • HTS+FUSE+Chandra HETGS (Scott et al. 2004) • 4 absorption systems from the host galaxy • 1 warm absorber Warsaw warm absorber workshop
LETGS observation of Mrk 279 - 10-20th May 2003 - 7 shots (30-100 ks) - Total exposure: 355 ks • - FUSE (91 ks) + HST (41.3 ks) • Arav et al. 2004, 2005 • Gabel et al. 2005 Warsaw warm absorber workshop
The first fit • Complex oxygen region: • Narrow emission lines (OVII f, OVIII Ly α) • Absorption lines OI-OVIII • Broad emission features OVII, OVIII Warsaw warm absorber workshop
X-rays broad lines in Sy 1 NGC 5548 Broad emission lines Iron K α 6.4 keV (Tanaka 1995) OVII triplet (21.5-22.09 Å) (ngc5548 Steenbrugge et al. 2005) OVIII Ly α (18.96 Å) (ngc4051 Ogle et al. 2004, Fenovcik et al. 2005) Warsaw warm absorber workshop
X-rays broad lines in Sy 1 Broad emission lines Iron K α 6.4 keV (Tanaka 1995) OVII triplet (21.5-22.09 Å) (ngc5548 Steenbrugge et al. 2005) OVIII Ly α (18.96 Å) (ngc4051 Ogle et al. 2004, Fenovcik et al. 2005) Relativistic broadening Warsaw warm absorber workshop
UV broad lines Gabel et al. 2005 FWHM=11000 km/s Warsaw warm absorber workshop
The LOC method • One component of ionized emitting gas is inadequate to describe emission. BLR as a distribution of clouds with different density, distance, column density, and covering factor. (Baldwin et al. 1995, Ferland et al.) The Locally Optimally emitting Cloud (LOC) Successfully applied to NGC 5548 (Korista & Goad 2000) Warsaw warm absorber workshop
Reflected Transmitted The LOC method (2) Ingredients for the BLR: Log NH=23 cm-2 Cf =0.5 Log n = 8-12.5 cm-3 Log r = 15.2-17.5 cm Warsaw warm absorber workshop
FUSE+HST best fit: = 0.89 • = 0.97 X-ray line luminosity ! Warsaw warm absorber workshop
Where are the lines produced? BLR size: 6-17 ldays (Santos-Lleo et al. 2001) Warsaw warm absorber workshop
No strong evidence of : • highly ionized skin of the BLR • relativistically broadened profile of OVIII Warsaw warm absorber workshop
Warm absorber: the models • SPEX (Kaastra 2001) • SLAB: transmission from a thin layer. Parameters: ionic column densities, outflow velocity, line broadening • XABS: fit with a pre-calculated grid of NH and ξ, gi ven a SED relies on XSTAR or Cloudy Parameters: NH, ξ, outflow velocity, line broadening • WARM: a continuos distribution of XABS Parameters: outflow velocity, sigma, ξlowξhigh Warsaw warm absorber workshop
Warm absorber: variability • Difficult issue because: • High S/N • High resolution • Sufficient flux amplitude variation • Long time scale variation: e.g. ngc 3516 (Turner et al.2005) ngc 4151 (Kraemer et al. 2005) • Short time scale variation: No ngc 5548 (Steenbrugge et al. 2005) ngc 3783 (Netzer et al. 2003) Yes ngc 4051 (Krongold et al. 2005) 0 days 10 Warsaw warm absorber workshop
warm absorber variability Logξ 2.5 0.46 NH • Large error bars • Large scatter in the ionization parameter Warsaw warm absorber workshop
The warm absorber (2) 3 ionized warm absorbers intrinsic to Mrk 279 2 absorbers in the Milky Way Warsaw warm absorber workshop
The nature of the wa in mrk 279 No pressure equilibrium continuous distribution ? Warsaw warm absorber workshop
Continuous vs clumpy wa • Phases in pressure equilibrium • NGC 3783 (Netzer et al. 2003, • Krongold et al. 2003) • Prompt reaction to flux variation • Continuous distribution • NGC 4051 (Ogle et al. 2004) • NGC 5548 (Steenbrugge et al. 2005) NGC5548 Warsaw warm absorber workshop
The Milky way ionized absorber Blue wing v= - 87 km/s σ = 80 km/s (Kaastra et al in prep.) Warsaw warm absorber workshop
Z=0 absorber: interpretation • predicted EW(OVI)X =0.74 mÅ, consistent with non detection • if OVII were connected with the narrow UV component • deep OVII edge which is not observed Global UV-X model: collisionally ionized absorber Winning interpretation:HVC complex C/K v= -(100-55) km/s solar metallicity Warsaw warm absorber workshop
Conclusions • Broad lines: HST + FUSE BLR lines in X-rays independent constraints to the X-ray spectral fit. No strong evidence of a highly ionized skin of the BLR No strong evidence of relativistic profiles • Warm absorbers: 3 main components, not variable, possibly in a continuous outflow z=0 absorption: most likely in the Milky Way Warsaw warm absorber workshop