300 likes | 452 Views
INFASA Symposium. Sustainability indicators: key tools for Swiss agricultural policy. INFASA Symposium, 16 March 2006 Vinzenz Jung, Swiss Federal Office for Agriculture. 100. 8. 9. 80. 29. 60. 71. in %. 40. 63. 20. 20. 0. 1990/92. 2005. Structural improvements, extension.
E N D
INFASA Symposium Sustainability indicators: key tools for Swiss agricultural policy INFASA Symposium, 16 March 2006 Vinzenz Jung, Swiss Federal Office for Agriculture
100 8 9 80 29 60 71 in % 40 63 20 20 0 1990/92 2005 Structural improvements, extension Direct payments Market support Policy background Change in the structure of support
Policy background General direct payments • to remunerate farmers for the provision of public goods • to compensate for difficult production conditions in mountains • Ecologicaldirectpayments • for ecological compensation areas which foster biodiversity • for the extensive production of cereals and rape-seed • for organic farming • for special animal welfare commitments
Policy background Federal Constitution (proposal 1995) 1 The Confederation shall ensure that agriculture contributes substantially by way of an ecological and market-oriented production: a.to the provision of food to the population; b. to the conservation of natural resources and the upkeep of rural landscapes; c. to a decentralized settlement of the country. 2 (...) d. It complements farmers‘ incomes with direct payments (...)
Policy background Federal Constitution(adopted 1996) 1 The Confederation shall ensure that agriculture contributes substantially by way of a sustainableand market-oriented production: a.to the provision of food to the population; b. to the conservation of natural resources and the upkeep of rural landscapes; c. to a decentralized settlement of the country. 2 (...) a. It complements farmers‘ incomes with direct payments (...) contingent on ecological cross- compliance conditions.
Policy background Cross-compliance conditions for all direct payments • a. balanced fertiliser use • b. appropriate share of ecological compensation areas • c. regular crop rotation • d. suitable soil protection • selected and targeted application of plant treatment products • animal welfare standards Necessary steps Criteria Implementation Control
Indicators Indicator-based monitoring as of 1995
Indicators Indicator-based monitoring as of 2000 as of 1995
Indicators Indicator-based monitoring continued/ intensified as of 2000 as of 1995
Indicators Indicator-based monitoring continued / intensified continued/ intensified as of 1995 as of 2000
Indicators Indicator-based monitoring continued / intensified continued/ intensified as of 2000 as of 1995 as of 2005
Indicators Sustainability indicators • Conceptual work started in 2001 • Indicator development and implementation: 2002 – (ongoing) • First publication (indicators and results) in 2005
Indicators Sustainability indicators: Concept
Indicators Sustainability indicators: Concept
Indicators Sustainability indicators: Concept
Indicators Sustainability indicators: Concept
Indicators Sustainability indicators: Concept
Indicators Sustainability indicators: Concept 2 indicators 1 indicator 4 indicators 1 indicator 2 indicators 2 indicators
Indicators Sustainability indicators: first results
Indicators Sustainability indicators: first results
Indicators Sustainability indicators: first results
Indicators Sustainability indicators: first results
Indicators Sustainability indicators: first results
Indicators Sustainability indicators: first results
Indicators Challenges andlimits • Conceptual level: • System boundaries • Indicators have to make sense from a global perspective • Indicator design • Implementation: What conceptually may look like a good indicator is sometimes too difficult to implement or too expensive • Sustainability indicators cannot replace broad monitoring
Indicators Sustainability indicators: use • Retrospective evaluation (ex-post), every four years • Prospective evaluation (ex-ante) (Ex.: Evaluation of policy package „AP 2011“)
Indicators Do indicators have an impact?
200 30 25 160 20 120 in 1,000 t N % 15 80 10 40 5 0 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Input Output N-efficiency Indicators Challenge: N-efficiency
Indicators Answer: Programme to improve sustainable resource use Region or value chain Fertilizer use Pesticides Soil Energy Biodiversity More efficient use of natural resources Measures Concept Planning
Indicators Conclusions • Indicators play an important role in Swiss agricultural policy • Policy evaluation Broad monitoring Sustainability indicators • Policy development Example: Resource programme in new policy package „AP 2011“ • Indicator work is work in progress, long-term commitment is crucial.