150 likes | 639 Views
Reserve design and the SLOSS debate. Letícia Soares Lost in Space October 4 th , 2011. Outline. Debate origins Theory sustaining the controversy What to focus in order to solve the problem Papers for discussion. Single Large or Several Small? When everything started.
E N D
Reserve design and the SLOSS debate Letícia Soares Lost in Space October 4th, 2011
Outline • Debate origins • Theory sustaining the controversy • What to focus in order to solve the problem • Papers for discussion
Single Large or Several Small?When everything started • Metapopulation models to access species richness in habitat patches. • Should refuges always consist of the largest possible single area?
Single Large or Several Small?When everything started • Experimentally isolated Red Mangrove forest • Species richness of canopy arthropods.
Single Large or Several Small?When everything started • Archipelago A supports the idea that a cluster of smaller patches might support more species than a single larger patch.
Understanding the real debate • Single large always assumed to be the best strategy. • Empirical evidence was showing the value of several small. • Which way to go when planning conservation reserves?
Why single large is intuitively good • 1) Species area relationship S = cAz ; c=constant; z=slope Larger areas = higher habitat diversity = more species log(S)= log(c)+ zlog(A)
Why single large is intuitively good • Species area relationship – is that always true?
Area response depends on the trophic groupDisruption of specific interactions
Small patches are important for overall species richness • Small patches accumulate species faster than larger patches. • Habitat diversity