1 / 7

NeoRealsim

NeoRealsim. Levels of Analysis. Theories and Levels of Analysis. Kenneth Waltz: “Man, the State, and War” Explored various explanations for war in a systematic way (placed in 3 images/levels) Human behavior (reductionist) Internal structure of the state (reductionist)

nhi
Download Presentation

NeoRealsim

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NeoRealsim Levels of Analysis

  2. Theories and Levels of Analysis • Kenneth Waltz: “Man, the State, and War” • Explored various explanations for war in a systematic way (placed in 3 images/levels) • Human behavior (reductionist) • Internal structure of the state (reductionist) • The international system (systemic) • Argued that anarchy (in the Int’l System) is a permissive or underlying cause of war. • #’s 1 & 2 determines the immediate causes of war. • #3 explains why war exists at all

  3. Waltz and Neo-Realism • Distinguished between reductionist and systemic: • Anarchy remained the permissive cause of war • (Disturbance of the) balance of power became the immediate cause of war • Both (above) are at the systemic level • Focusing on the reductionist level does not satisfactorily explain the occurrence of war • Lessons so far: • Levels of analysis provide a powerful tool to organize ideas • Theories differ in their assessment of what is considered to be the most important level (e.g., Waltz=neo-realist=systemic level) • Emphasizing one level over another involves deep on I.R. • philosophical and theoretical issues

  4. Levels of Analysis (Singer) SYSTEMIC Individual State • Focus on humans as individuals, which is the most micro-level • Personalities of people making decisions • Personal and political history • (Mis)perception and information • Attention on domestic political and social system • Distinctions made between state, nation, and government vs. society • Sub-National Actors • Types of Political Systems • Socio-political culture • External Influences considered • IGOs, NGOs, MNC’s (yet still sees these as of minor importance) • Characteristics of the system • Dyadic Relations • World system • Environmental characteristics

  5. Individual Level Considerations • (1) Hitler’s personality. (2) Kennedy’s health and state of mind during meeting with Krushchev. • Iraq and “Lessons of History.” Personal values and experiences (personal diplomacy). • Misperception and information. Crisis decision-making. Informational overload and groupthink. Quality and availability of information. • Humans in organizations and roles: humans often act as representatives of institutions. Why? • Selection; Socialization; Institutional biases in perception and information (where you sit determines what you see) • Nature of Humankind: society acts to constrain citizen’s strive for power. But collectively, this goes unchecked. Are we “good” or “bad”?

  6. State Level Considerations • Sub-national Actors: groups of people (in and out of gov’t) that may attempt to influence policy. • Types of Political Systems • How decisions are reached? Who’s involved? • Inclusiveness of gov’t; the nature of the opposition • Broad & refined distinctions between varying types • Society and Political Culture • Forces outside of gov’t. A country’s economic wealth, or social & political capital. • The importance of: specific economic systems; civilization; the national interest

  7. Systemic Level Considerations • External influences (broader concept than systemic influence) includes pressure from other gov’ts in bilateral relations, NGO’s, MNC’s and IGO’s • Characteristics of the system: it is a specific theoretical construct of the environment in which countries act (Westphalian)... Self-help system, containing functionally identical sovereign actors (internal control, external representation). [analogy of a pool table] • Relations are fundamentally dyadic between pairs of countries (e.g., trade flows, distance, power, relative size) • World system applies to characteristics of the environment . Waltz distinguishes between anarchy (int’l) and hierarchy (dom.) • Participants in a system are likely to share common norms and values from system to society. These norms can be seen as key to understanding how the international system works.

More Related