130 likes | 324 Views
Advisor : Whai -En Chen Speaker : Yen- Neng Pan. iP2P: A Peer to Peer System for Mobile Devices. Author by : Chien-Chn Huang-Fu and Yi-Bing Lin , National Chiao Tung University . Herman Chung- Hwa Rao , Far EasTone Telecommunications Co., LTD.
E N D
Advisor : Whai-En Chen Speaker : Yen-Neng Pan iP2P: A Peer to Peer System for Mobile Devices Author by : Chien-Chn Huang-Fu and Yi-Bing Lin , National Chiao Tung University . Herman Chung-HwaRao , Far EasTone Telecommunications Co., LTD. IEEE Wireless Communications April 2009
Introduction • HYBRID P2P • Utilized centralized servers to maintain the mapping between the identifications • PURE P2P • Query for identifying the transport address of participating peer is flooded through the network • To implement a P2P system for mobile devices that have the capability to access mobile telecommunication networks, such as the Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, this paper propose a pure P2Psystem called iP2P.
Introduction (Cont.) • Step 1 – peer start the P2P application, which attach to IP network • Step 2 – the peer registers to the centralized server by providing its id and address • Step 3 – the calling peer queries the centralized server to retrieve the address of the called peer • Step 4 – upon receipt the address, the calling peer establihe a P2P connection to called peer without centralized server.
iP2P Architecture • Use Mobile Station ISDN number as the peer identification which is globally unique. • The iP2P control message are encapsulated in SMS. • iP2P module • iP2P Control Function is responsible accessing iP2P Control Message through the SMS API and controlling the connection through the iP2P Socket API • iP2P Socket API is the standard socket API with minor modifications.
Issue of STUNT Approac h • STUNTsolution pose problems: • Setting an appropriate TTL value of SYN packet might not be trivial. • The port prediction server cannot guarantee to provide transport mapping of the public and private transport address for the NAT server.(especially some NAT server randomly assign.)
Conclusion • iP2P reuse UMTSmobility management mechanism and SMS as th control protocol • Implemented the system on Windows Mobile 6.0 Professional OS. • The measured data from 200 experiments: • Connection set-up time:21.724 sec • SMS Delivery time: 2.637sec • WiFi Network Attach time :9.428 sec
Conclusion(Cont.) • Advantage • Efficient query without a requirement to implement its own centralized server. • Use SMS push mechanism to establish P2P connection can significantly save power consumption in the mobile device • Allow more flexible IP address allocation