1 / 52

FRET – Molecular Storytelling

FRET – Molecular Storytelling. April 22, 2005 Rose Chase. The beginning…. Theodor F örster

nia
Download Presentation

FRET – Molecular Storytelling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FRET – Molecular Storytelling April 22, 2005 Rose Chase

  2. The beginning… • Theodor Förster • 1940s proposed mathematical law for dependence of fluorescence decay of donor (D) on the concentration of acceptor (A), assuming a dipole-dipole interaction in solution (J.Phys.Chem. 1965, 69, 1061-1062) Exponential decay for one D molecule

  3. But… • One D, not applicable, therefore average over all distances • His equations, although eventually proven correct, were founded on incorrect/incomplete assumptions • Different distributions of A • Mathematical shortcuts • But THREE different scientists came to same conclusion nonetheless

  4. Missing point • ASSUMING • Once an A is excited, no further quenching of D • Therefore, A molecules decay exponentially • “It thus seems, that the proper result obtained by Förster nevertheless does not justify his statistical reasoning.” -Mira Leibowitz

  5. Impact of FRET • After the initial fuss about the validity of Förster’s derivations, little else. • Resurgence in past several years, especially in biology/biochemistry/biophysics thanks to: • FRET capable spectral GFP mutants • Engineering of peptides w/novel fluorescent reagents • Ability to couple to different imaging techniques • AND the need to “see” finer details

  6. Power of FRET • Probe macromolecular interactions • Interaction assumed upon fluorescence decay • Study kinetics of association/dissociation between macromolecules • Estimation of distances • In vitro AND in vivo • Single molecule studies

  7. What is FRET? • Förster Resonance Energy Transfer • Fluorescence if both D and A are fluorescent • Radiation-less energy transition b/t a D and A w/ finite probability based on proximity • Energy is transferred through the resonant coupling of the dipole moments of D and A

  8. Förster Resonance Energy Transfer • Complicated, but thorough • energy diagram, depicting • all possible paths of relaxation • upon excitation

  9. FRET • More simple, concise scheme, depicting the transfer of energy from D to A

  10. Effects of FRET • Intensity of D decreases • Sensitized fluorescence of A appears upon D excitation • Lifetime of D excited stated decreases • Polarization anisotropy increases • Taking advantage of these points… • Curr. Opin. Immun. 2004, 16, 418-427

  11. Efficiency (E) • Measuring FRET efficiency • These methods are best for fixed cells • Photobleaching usually done with high power laser setting in confocal

  12. Spectral Methods • Goal of spectral methods is to selectively measure FRET from D, A, or sensitized fluorescence • Problem – Artifacts from sequential acquisition of images unless simultaneous

  13. Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging (FLIM) • Great for biological samples b/c decay of D increases w/FRET • Time/Frequency domain measurements • Time - can get both degree of complex formation and intrinsic E • FLIM + 2 photon excitation + FRET  in vivo monitoring

  14. Polarization Anisotropy and FRET • Polarization anisotropy – ability of fluorescence to retain the direction of polarization of excitation source • Illuminate sample w/ polarized excitation and read fluorescence parallel and perpendicular to polarization axis • Ex. GFP – slow moving w/ short lifetime, therefore little loss  parallel; but cluster and get energy migration FRET  perpendicular

  15. Limits • ASSUMPTION of interaction based on fluorescence, possible intermediate • Changes in E may be attributed to conformational changes or restrictions • Crowding/aggregation • COST • On to applications…

  16. Ratiometric indicator for Cl- • Neuron 2000, 27, 447-459 • Cl- • Regulation of cell volume, intracell. pH, fluid secretion, stabilization of resting potential • Developmental intracell. [Cl-] determines whether GAGAergic synapes excite/inhibit postsynaptic target • Change in gradient has other periphery effects

  17. Effects of incorrect [Cl-] • Cystic fibrosis – thick and sticky sweat, mucus, saliva, and digestive juices • Myotonia congenita – slow relaxation of muscles • Inherited hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis – kidney stones (exacerbate w/high salt) • Bartter syndrome – muscle cramping and weakness, constipation, increases freq. of urination, and growth failure (characteristic low blood [Cl-], high urine [Cl-]) • Hyperekplexia/startle disease – excessive startle reaction, extreme muscle tension, unstable gait

  18. Measuring [Cl-] • While using FRET realized Cl- senisitivity! • Fusion protein CPF/YFP fluorophores can be used as a ratiometric, targetable, and genetically encoded indicator • On to the good stuff…

  19. All excited at 434nm and normalized to peaks at 527 Depict Ratio of YFP/CFP emission Check for FRET by TEV cleavage  increase of D at 485nm, loss of A at 527nm Checking the protein

  20. A - Halide preference B - inc. quenching at inc. [H+] C - re-plot as fxn of pH D - 10 fold shift for 1pH unit E - effect on apparent [Cl-] D - %error Ion sensitivity

  21. Rmax and Rmin using patch pipette [Cl-] = Kd * (2.39 – R) (R – 0.49) Calibrating Clomeleon

  22. Utilizing Clomeleon • In embryonic neurons, GABA elicits depol., in adults, hyperpol. • Switch is paralleled by changes in [Cl-] • Use clomeleon to directly measure! • Resting [Cl-] in living cells

  23. A & B – pulse of GABA via micropipette, 10-30μm from soma of individual neuron Simultaneous whole cell patch clamp and fluorescence C – good fit of conc. to current D – discrepancy from removal of Cl- from cell E – pH dependence check GABA mediation

  24. Concentration and current monitored Change in conc. certainly enough to induce switch of GABAergic synaptic input from inhibitory to excitatory Dendritic Signaling

  25. Perks of Clomeleon • Visible light excitation • Good signal to noise, even at low conc. • Not affected by other physiologically relevant anions • Simple loading • High MW retards diffusion, preventing collapse of spatial gradients also retards wash out during recording • Genetically encoded  specificity/targeting

  26. Probing interactions with FRET • Biochemistry 2004, 43, 8754-8765 • Phospholamban (PLB) inhibits Ca-ATPase of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SERCA) at submicromolar Ca+2 • Inhibition relieved by either elevation of Ca+2 to micromolar, or phosphorylation of PLB (adrenergic response)

  27. Importance of PLB-SERCA • Linked to development of dilated cardiomyopathy and progression to heart failure in young adults • PLB possible drug target • Therefore, elucidation of mechanism by which PLB regulates SERCA important

  28. Decreased inhibition maybe due to PLB dissoc. from SERCA, must measure Kd2 Donor labeled SERCA and Acceptor labeled PLB in reconstituted membranes The goal

  29. A quick look at methods • PLB • DABCYL-SE, chosen b/c lacks fluorescence emission and therefore does not interfere with donor emission signal • SERCA • Labeled with IAEDANS • Excitation at 351.1nm • Temp controlled by water bath at 25°C

  30. A lot like earlier equations… FRET Efficiency and D-A distance A tiny bit of math…

  31. Reconstituted, labeled SERCA is functional and fully inhibited at high Ca+2, and nearly fully functional at low Ca+2 Labeled PLB also functions same as unlabeled High and Low Ca+2 Fxn

  32. At distance greater than 45Å, FRET less than 10% AND b/c SERCA ~55-90Å, FRET only detectable if proteins physically interact in membrane, with rapid FRET dissipation w/ PLB dissociation Supporting interaction b/t SERCA & PLB

  33. At low pCa+2

  34. Small but significant (and ONLY) difference was in maximal energy transfer D-A distance at low 33.1+0.4Å vs. 34.2+0.2Å at high, therefore small structural change, but no dissociation At high pCa+2, much the same

  35. Time resolved FRET • Supports steady state data at high and low Ca+2

  36. More ATPase activity • Independent of SERCA conc., dependent on total PLB/SERCA ratio, membrane and free • Inhibition increase with addition of PLB indicates nonspecific component of inhibition

  37. Anisotropy Measurements • PLB increases anisotropy, indicating SERCA aggregation • May account for fig.10

  38. Therefore… • The conclude the hypothesis must be revised.

  39. Conclusions • Affinity of PLB for SERCA is so high it is essentially a SERCA subunit under physiological conditions • Relief of inhibition at micromolar Ca+2 is due to structural rearrangement within the SERCA-PLB complex, rather than dissociation

  40. Association of TM helices in lipid bilayers • Langmuir 2004, 20, 9053-9060 • Membrane proteins • Cell adhesion • Recognition • Motility • Energy production • Transport of nutrients and cholesterol • Biochemical signal transduction • Engineering of surface immobilized bilayers containing active, integral membrane proteins: • Drug screening devices, mimetics of cell and tissue surfaces, matrices for stress free cell immobilization

  41. Focus on… • Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) • Causes various cancers and developmental abnormalities by affecting lateral dimerization in the membrane

  42. Ambitions • Characterize the architecture of surface supported protein/lipid bilayers • Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) • FRET – show that FRET signal is same in suspended liposomes and in surface supported bilayers • Further develop an imaging FRET methodology that may provide a less expensive and less tedious alternative to solution FRET

  43. Excitation and structure check • A – FRET% calculated from: • B – CD spectra to check for helix structure

  44. Short on Photobleaching • Images taken of D and A prior to bleaching • A is bleached in small area, while measuring the decrease in intensity. Continued until no significant change in intensity is noted. • D image captured after A bleaching. With A bleached, no ET from D to A. FRET is obvious from the appearance of a bright spot in the D spot, where A was bleached.

  45. More photobleaching… • Did run control to ensure A bleaching did not bleach D

  46. FRAP • Small area is bleached, fluorescence monitored. If molecules are mobile, bleached spot will gradually disappear due to lateral diffusion of both bleached and fluorescent molecules

  47. More FRAP

  48. Less pretty view…

  49. FRAP indicates… • Substrate immobilizes the proteins, but does not induce protein dissolution from the lipid matrix • Protein-protein interactions in supported bilayer are like frozen “snapshot” of interactions in free suspended vesicles

  50. Solution FRET vs. Imaging FRET

More Related